Hua Wang , Jun-feng Kong , Li Wen , Xiao-jing Wang , Wen-Tao Zhang , Zhi-qing Wang , Lu Zeng , Yan-tao Huang , Shi-hai Yang , Man Li , Tian-wu Chen , Jun Liu , Guang-xian Wang
{"title":"预测模型的发展,以确定颅内动脉瘤负责蛛网膜下腔出血的多发性囊状动脉瘤患者。","authors":"Hua Wang , Jun-feng Kong , Li Wen , Xiao-jing Wang , Wen-Tao Zhang , Zhi-qing Wang , Lu Zeng , Yan-tao Huang , Shi-hai Yang , Man Li , Tian-wu Chen , Jun Liu , Guang-xian Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and test machine learning (ML) models using computed tomography angiography to identify the intracranial aneurysm (IA) responsible for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) accurately in patients with multiple saccular IAs and to determine whether these models outperform traditional predictive markers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Two hundred seven SAH patients with 460 IAs from four hospitals were included from May 2018–December 2023 and randomly divided into training (80%) and internal validation (20%) sets. Additionally, an external validation set comprising 65 patients with 147 IAs from other four hospitals was used. The predictive models were developed using ML methods that integrated the morphological features of IAs (e.g., size and shape) to identify the responsible IA. These models were then compared with traditional predictive markers that relies on hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The areas under the curves (AUCs) for the hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size were 0.496–0.505, 0.502–0.523, and 0.488–0.498 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Among the 13 ML models, the best-performing models were the Gaussian process, logistic regression, and quadratic discriminant analysis models, with AUCs of 0.912 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.881–0.943], 0.894 (95 % CI: 0.861–0.928), and 0.890 (95 % CI: 0.756–0.924), respectively, for the training set; 0.869 (95 % CI: 0.798–0.941), 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.802–0.942), and 0.853 (95 % CI: 0.778–0.929), respectively, for the internal validation set; and 0.898 (95 % CI: 0.848–0.947), 0.892 (95 % CI: 0.840–0.943), and 0.897 (95 % CI: 0.847–0.947), respectively, for the external validation set. DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these models, but all the models outperformed traditional predictive markers (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML models that integrate multiple morphological features can predict the IA responsible for SAH accurately in patients with multiple IAs. These models outperform traditional predictive markers in identifying the responsible IA, thereby facilitating prompt and effective treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12063,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Radiology","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 112466"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of predictive models to identify the intracranial aneurysm responsible for subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with multiple saccular aneurysms\",\"authors\":\"Hua Wang , Jun-feng Kong , Li Wen , Xiao-jing Wang , Wen-Tao Zhang , Zhi-qing Wang , Lu Zeng , Yan-tao Huang , Shi-hai Yang , Man Li , Tian-wu Chen , Jun Liu , Guang-xian Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejrad.2025.112466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To develop and test machine learning (ML) models using computed tomography angiography to identify the intracranial aneurysm (IA) responsible for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) accurately in patients with multiple saccular IAs and to determine whether these models outperform traditional predictive markers.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Two hundred seven SAH patients with 460 IAs from four hospitals were included from May 2018–December 2023 and randomly divided into training (80%) and internal validation (20%) sets. Additionally, an external validation set comprising 65 patients with 147 IAs from other four hospitals was used. The predictive models were developed using ML methods that integrated the morphological features of IAs (e.g., size and shape) to identify the responsible IA. These models were then compared with traditional predictive markers that relies on hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The areas under the curves (AUCs) for the hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size were 0.496–0.505, 0.502–0.523, and 0.488–0.498 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Among the 13 ML models, the best-performing models were the Gaussian process, logistic regression, and quadratic discriminant analysis models, with AUCs of 0.912 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.881–0.943], 0.894 (95 % CI: 0.861–0.928), and 0.890 (95 % CI: 0.756–0.924), respectively, for the training set; 0.869 (95 % CI: 0.798–0.941), 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.802–0.942), and 0.853 (95 % CI: 0.778–0.929), respectively, for the internal validation set; and 0.898 (95 % CI: 0.848–0.947), 0.892 (95 % CI: 0.840–0.943), and 0.897 (95 % CI: 0.847–0.947), respectively, for the external validation set. DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these models, but all the models outperformed traditional predictive markers (<em>P</em> < 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ML models that integrate multiple morphological features can predict the IA responsible for SAH accurately in patients with multiple IAs. These models outperform traditional predictive markers in identifying the responsible IA, thereby facilitating prompt and effective treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005522\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0720048X25005522","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of predictive models to identify the intracranial aneurysm responsible for subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients with multiple saccular aneurysms
Purpose
To develop and test machine learning (ML) models using computed tomography angiography to identify the intracranial aneurysm (IA) responsible for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) accurately in patients with multiple saccular IAs and to determine whether these models outperform traditional predictive markers.
Materials and Methods
Two hundred seven SAH patients with 460 IAs from four hospitals were included from May 2018–December 2023 and randomly divided into training (80%) and internal validation (20%) sets. Additionally, an external validation set comprising 65 patients with 147 IAs from other four hospitals was used. The predictive models were developed using ML methods that integrated the morphological features of IAs (e.g., size and shape) to identify the responsible IA. These models were then compared with traditional predictive markers that relies on hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size.
Results
The areas under the curves (AUCs) for the hemorrhage patterns and the maximum IA size were 0.496–0.505, 0.502–0.523, and 0.488–0.498 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. Among the 13 ML models, the best-performing models were the Gaussian process, logistic regression, and quadratic discriminant analysis models, with AUCs of 0.912 [95 % confidence interval (CI): 0.881–0.943], 0.894 (95 % CI: 0.861–0.928), and 0.890 (95 % CI: 0.756–0.924), respectively, for the training set; 0.869 (95 % CI: 0.798–0.941), 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.802–0.942), and 0.853 (95 % CI: 0.778–0.929), respectively, for the internal validation set; and 0.898 (95 % CI: 0.848–0.947), 0.892 (95 % CI: 0.840–0.943), and 0.897 (95 % CI: 0.847–0.947), respectively, for the external validation set. DeLong tests revealed no significant differences among these models, but all the models outperformed traditional predictive markers (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
ML models that integrate multiple morphological features can predict the IA responsible for SAH accurately in patients with multiple IAs. These models outperform traditional predictive markers in identifying the responsible IA, thereby facilitating prompt and effective treatment.
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Radiology is an international journal which aims to communicate to its readers, state-of-the-art information on imaging developments in the form of high quality original research articles and timely reviews on current developments in the field.
Its audience includes clinicians at all levels of training including radiology trainees, newly qualified imaging specialists and the experienced radiologist. Its aim is to inform efficient, appropriate and evidence-based imaging practice to the benefit of patients worldwide.