复杂的内部和外部环境相互作用决定了小岛屿发展中国家发展初级保健登记的可行性和准备程度:顺序混合方法研究。

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2025-09-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2025.1593902
Natasha P Sobers, Joeleita Agard, Jacqueline Campbell, Kia Lewis, S M Jeyaseelan
{"title":"复杂的内部和外部环境相互作用决定了小岛屿发展中国家发展初级保健登记的可行性和准备程度:顺序混合方法研究。","authors":"Natasha P Sobers, Joeleita Agard, Jacqueline Campbell, Kia Lewis, S M Jeyaseelan","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2025.1593902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed feasibility and readiness for registry development and sought to understand the factors likely to affect the implementation of a registry into health systems in small island developing states (SIDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted online quantitative surveys and focus groups among health managers in four SIDS. Both survey and focus group guides were developed primarily based on four domains (inner setting, outer setting, individual characteristics and implementation process) of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Focus groups within each of four territories were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis using a deductively derived coding framework. We synthesized our findings using a systems archetype informed by the common themes emerging from the dual methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From the 37 respondents of the online survey, 40% and 16% identified diabetes and hypertension as the highest priority NCDs for registry development. Respondents were more concerned about monitoring and improving care for patients (65%) than about determining disease burden (16%) or outcomes monitoring (8%). Strong mission alignment, external pressure and support and emerging data protection laws were identified as potential facilitators. Participants reported lack of human resource capacity and funding to support NCD registry and poor information systems infrastructure. The emerging systems archetype indicated that lack of investment in human and systems infrastructure were significant threats to registry success.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite external interest in registry development, infrastructural and human resource capacity barriers are likely contribute to a sub-optimal implementation in SIDS. We recommend greater collaboration between countries and enhanced regional support to overcome the challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"5 ","pages":"1593902"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex inner and outer setting interactions determine feasibility and readiness of developing primary care registries in small island developing states: sequential mixed methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha P Sobers, Joeleita Agard, Jacqueline Campbell, Kia Lewis, S M Jeyaseelan\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frhs.2025.1593902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We assessed feasibility and readiness for registry development and sought to understand the factors likely to affect the implementation of a registry into health systems in small island developing states (SIDS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted online quantitative surveys and focus groups among health managers in four SIDS. Both survey and focus group guides were developed primarily based on four domains (inner setting, outer setting, individual characteristics and implementation process) of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Focus groups within each of four territories were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis using a deductively derived coding framework. We synthesized our findings using a systems archetype informed by the common themes emerging from the dual methods.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From the 37 respondents of the online survey, 40% and 16% identified diabetes and hypertension as the highest priority NCDs for registry development. Respondents were more concerned about monitoring and improving care for patients (65%) than about determining disease burden (16%) or outcomes monitoring (8%). Strong mission alignment, external pressure and support and emerging data protection laws were identified as potential facilitators. Participants reported lack of human resource capacity and funding to support NCD registry and poor information systems infrastructure. The emerging systems archetype indicated that lack of investment in human and systems infrastructure were significant threats to registry success.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Despite external interest in registry development, infrastructural and human resource capacity barriers are likely contribute to a sub-optimal implementation in SIDS. We recommend greater collaboration between countries and enhanced regional support to overcome the challenges.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"1593902\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518279/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in health services\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1593902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2025.1593902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:我们评估了登记处发展的可行性和准备情况,并试图了解可能影响小岛屿发展中国家(SIDS)卫生系统登记处实施的因素。方法:我们对四个小岛屿发展中国家的卫生管理人员进行了在线定量调查和焦点小组。调查和焦点小组指南的制定主要基于实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的四个领域(内部环境、外部环境、个人特征和实施过程)。对四个区域内的焦点群体进行记录,逐字转录,并使用演绎衍生编码框架使用主题内容分析进行分析。我们使用一个系统原型来综合我们的发现,这个原型是由双重方法中出现的共同主题所通知的。结果:在线调查的37名受访者中,分别有40%和16%的人将糖尿病和高血压确定为登记处发展中最优先的非传染性疾病。受访者更关心对患者的监测和改善护理(65%),而不是确定疾病负担(16%)或结局监测(8%)。强有力的任务一致性、外部压力和支持以及新出现的数据保护法被认为是潜在的促进因素。与会者报告说,缺乏人力资源能力和支持非传染性疾病登记的资金,信息系统基础设施落后。新出现的系统原型表明,缺乏对人力和系统基础设施的投资是注册成功的重大威胁。讨论:尽管外部对登记处的发展感兴趣,但基础设施和人力资源能力障碍可能导致小岛屿发展中国家的执行不够理想。我们建议各国加强合作,加强区域支持,以克服挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex inner and outer setting interactions determine feasibility and readiness of developing primary care registries in small island developing states: sequential mixed methods study.

Introduction: We assessed feasibility and readiness for registry development and sought to understand the factors likely to affect the implementation of a registry into health systems in small island developing states (SIDS).

Methods: We conducted online quantitative surveys and focus groups among health managers in four SIDS. Both survey and focus group guides were developed primarily based on four domains (inner setting, outer setting, individual characteristics and implementation process) of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Focus groups within each of four territories were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using thematic content analysis using a deductively derived coding framework. We synthesized our findings using a systems archetype informed by the common themes emerging from the dual methods.

Findings: From the 37 respondents of the online survey, 40% and 16% identified diabetes and hypertension as the highest priority NCDs for registry development. Respondents were more concerned about monitoring and improving care for patients (65%) than about determining disease burden (16%) or outcomes monitoring (8%). Strong mission alignment, external pressure and support and emerging data protection laws were identified as potential facilitators. Participants reported lack of human resource capacity and funding to support NCD registry and poor information systems infrastructure. The emerging systems archetype indicated that lack of investment in human and systems infrastructure were significant threats to registry success.

Discussion: Despite external interest in registry development, infrastructural and human resource capacity barriers are likely contribute to a sub-optimal implementation in SIDS. We recommend greater collaboration between countries and enhanced regional support to overcome the challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信