Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook
{"title":"系统分析44项干预措施中使用的行为改变技术,以减少医护人员之间的不专业行为。","authors":"Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.
Background: Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.
Methods: A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.
Results: The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.
Conclusions: The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.
期刊介绍:
Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989.
TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.