系统分析44项干预措施中使用的行为改变技术,以减少医护人员之间的不专业行为。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook
{"title":"系统分析44项干预措施中使用的行为改变技术,以减少医护人员之间的不专业行为。","authors":"Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook","doi":"10.1093/tbm/ibaf058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":48679,"journal":{"name":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527449/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Aunger, Bianca Ungureanu, Jill Maben, Ruth Abrams, Alice M Turner, Johanna I Westbrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tbm/ibaf058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12527449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaf058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在设计改变行为的干预措施时,应采用行为和实施科学框架,包括在组织环境中提供的干预措施,以提高其有效性、可复制性和透明度。然而,这在卫生服务研究中往往做得不好。这一缺陷也影响了解决医护人员不专业行为的干预措施。粗鲁和欺凌行为会损害患者安全和员工福祉。本研究建立在对这些UB干预措施的早期现实回顾的基础上,以追溯识别其有效成分。方法:使用MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL和谷歌Scholar进行系统检索,更新至2024年7月。干预描述从研究报告中提取,并使用针对2024年5月版本的行为改变技术(BCT)本体的定向内容分析进行独立编码,该本体包含284个BCT。结果:检索确定了262个标题和摘要,产生了5个新的报告。结合先前综述的42篇论文,纳入了44项干预措施的47份报告。干预措施分为单次治疗(n = 15)、多次治疗(n = 12)、联合治疗(n = 6)、专业问责(n = 7)和结构化文化改变(n = 4)。复杂干预使用更多的bct:基于会话的干预侧重于提高意识和角色扮演,对后果的专业问责,以及对目标导向技术的结构化文化变革。很少有干预措施报告了负面结果,限制了对哪些bct驱动有效性的理解。结论:BCT本体广泛适用于医疗保健行业的组织行为改变。复杂的干预措施采用基于结果和目标导向的BCTs,但由于评估不佳,具体BCTs的有效性尚不清楚。未来的干预应使用BCT本体来改进干预报告和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.

Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.

Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.

Systematically analyzing behavior change techniques used in 44 interventions to reduce unprofessional behavior between healthcare staff.

Background: Behavioral and implementation science frameworks should be employed in the design of interventions to change behavior, including those delivered in organizational settings, to enhance their effectiveness, replicability, and transparency. However, this is often not done well in health services research. This deficiency also impacts interventions to address unprofessional behaviors (UBs) among healthcare staff. UBs include rudeness and bullying, which harm patient safety and staff wellbeing. This study builds on an earlier realist review of these UB interventions to retroactively identify their active components.

Methods: A systematic search was updated to July 2024 using MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Intervention descriptions were extracted from study reports and independently coded using directed content analysis against the May 2024 version of the behavior change technique (BCT) Ontology, which contained 284 BCTs.

Results: The search identified 262 titles and abstracts, yielding five new reports. Combined with 42 papers from the prior review, 47 reports of 44 interventions were included. Interventions were categorized as single-session (n = 15), multisession (n = 12), combined session (n = 6), professional accountability (n = 7), and structured culture change (n = 4). Complex interventions used more BCTs: session-based interventions focused on awareness-raising and roleplay, professional accountability on consequences, and structured culture change on goal-oriented techniques. Few interventions reported negative outcomes, limiting the understanding of which BCTs drive effectiveness.

Conclusions: The BCT ontology is broadly applicable to organizational behavior change in healthcare. Complex interventions employ consequence-based and goal-oriented BCTs, but the effectiveness of specific BCTs remains unclear due to poor evaluations. Future interventions should use the BCT Ontology to improve intervention reporting and effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Translational Behavioral Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Translational Behavioral Medicine publishes content that engages, informs, and catalyzes dialogue about behavioral medicine among the research, practice, and policy communities. TBM began receiving an Impact Factor in 2015 and currently holds an Impact Factor of 2.989. TBM is one of two journals published by the Society of Behavioral Medicine. The Society of Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary organization of clinicians, educators, and scientists dedicated to promoting the study of the interactions of behavior with biology and the environment, and then applying that knowledge to improve the health and well-being of individuals, families, communities, and populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信