在英国使用非处方布洛芬治疗痛经、偏头痛和急性鼻窦炎的健康经济学评估

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Daniela Afonso, Amy Dymond, Isabel Eastwood, William Green, William Laughey, Patricia Aluko, Graham Pennick, Imran Lodhi, Bruce Charlesworth
{"title":"在英国使用非处方布洛芬治疗痛经、偏头痛和急性鼻窦炎的健康经济学评估","authors":"Daniela Afonso, Amy Dymond, Isabel Eastwood, William Green, William Laughey, Patricia Aluko, Graham Pennick, Imran Lodhi, Bruce Charlesworth","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00660-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased appropriate use of self-care for minor conditions can reduce the number of healthcare professional appointments and, hence, provide opportunity cost savings to the National Health Service (NHS). The receipt of over-the-counter medications can lead to faster access to treatment, improved health-related quality of life, and fewer education and work days lost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model was developed to evaluate the economic impact of a change in the proportion of people using self-care with ibuprofen to manage three conditions (dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis) on preventable healthcare resource use from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS). The total number of appointments for each condition was estimated from NHS Digital and was based on the number of primary (n = 230,298,091) and secondary (n = 22,839,832) care visits, and the proportion of visits due to each condition (informed by clinical opinion). Work and school days lost were also modelled to estimate the wider indirect costs associated with preventable absences due to delays in receiving treatment. Deterministic sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted to estimate the uncertainty associated with the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of self-care with ibuprofen was increased by 5% in the base case analysis. The results indicate that this increase could prevent 409,243 appointments in the United Kingdom over a one-year time horizon. 882,875 and 117,114 work and school hours lost could also be prevented, respectively. Sensitivity analysis suggests the magnitude of change in self-care, average working hours/pay and appointment waiting times are the main drivers of the model results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-care with ibuprofen provides opportunity cost-savings to the NHS and frees up the capacity of healthcare professionals so that they can focus on more severe conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"56"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523155/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A health economics assessment of self-care with over-the-counter ibuprofen in dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis in the United Kingdom.\",\"authors\":\"Daniela Afonso, Amy Dymond, Isabel Eastwood, William Green, William Laughey, Patricia Aluko, Graham Pennick, Imran Lodhi, Bruce Charlesworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-025-00660-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased appropriate use of self-care for minor conditions can reduce the number of healthcare professional appointments and, hence, provide opportunity cost savings to the National Health Service (NHS). The receipt of over-the-counter medications can lead to faster access to treatment, improved health-related quality of life, and fewer education and work days lost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model was developed to evaluate the economic impact of a change in the proportion of people using self-care with ibuprofen to manage three conditions (dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis) on preventable healthcare resource use from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS). The total number of appointments for each condition was estimated from NHS Digital and was based on the number of primary (n = 230,298,091) and secondary (n = 22,839,832) care visits, and the proportion of visits due to each condition (informed by clinical opinion). Work and school days lost were also modelled to estimate the wider indirect costs associated with preventable absences due to delays in receiving treatment. Deterministic sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted to estimate the uncertainty associated with the analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The use of self-care with ibuprofen was increased by 5% in the base case analysis. The results indicate that this increase could prevent 409,243 appointments in the United Kingdom over a one-year time horizon. 882,875 and 117,114 work and school hours lost could also be prevented, respectively. Sensitivity analysis suggests the magnitude of change in self-care, average working hours/pay and appointment waiting times are the main drivers of the model results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-care with ibuprofen provides opportunity cost-savings to the NHS and frees up the capacity of healthcare professionals so that they can focus on more severe conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523155/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00660-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00660-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:增加适当使用自我护理的小病可以减少医疗保健专业人员预约的数量,因此,为国民健康服务(NHS)提供机会成本节约。接受非处方药物可以更快地获得治疗,改善与健康有关的生活质量,减少教育和工作日的损失。方法:建立一个模型,从NHS和个人社会服务(PSS)的角度,评估使用布洛芬自我保健治疗三种疾病(痛经、偏头痛和急性鼻窦炎)的人群比例变化对可预防医疗资源使用的经济影响。每种疾病的总预约次数是根据NHS Digital估计的,基于初级(n = 230,298,091)和次级(n = 22,839,832)护理就诊次数,以及每种疾病的就诊比例(根据临床意见)。损失的工作日和上学日也被建模,以估计由于接受治疗延误而导致的可预防缺勤所带来的更广泛的间接成本。还进行了确定性敏感性和情景分析,以估计与分析相关的不确定性。结果:在基础病例分析中,自我护理使用布洛芬的人数增加了5%。结果表明,在一年的时间范围内,这一增长可能会阻止英国409,243项任命。也可以分别避免882,875和117,114个工作和学习时间的损失。敏感性分析表明,自我护理、平均工作时间/工资和预约等待时间的变化幅度是模型结果的主要驱动因素。结论:布洛芬的自我护理为NHS提供了节省成本的机会,并释放了医疗保健专业人员的能力,使他们能够专注于更严重的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A health economics assessment of self-care with over-the-counter ibuprofen in dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis in the United Kingdom.

A health economics assessment of self-care with over-the-counter ibuprofen in dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis in the United Kingdom.

A health economics assessment of self-care with over-the-counter ibuprofen in dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis in the United Kingdom.

A health economics assessment of self-care with over-the-counter ibuprofen in dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis in the United Kingdom.

Background: Increased appropriate use of self-care for minor conditions can reduce the number of healthcare professional appointments and, hence, provide opportunity cost savings to the National Health Service (NHS). The receipt of over-the-counter medications can lead to faster access to treatment, improved health-related quality of life, and fewer education and work days lost.

Methods: A model was developed to evaluate the economic impact of a change in the proportion of people using self-care with ibuprofen to manage three conditions (dysmenorrhoea, migraine and acute rhinosinusitis) on preventable healthcare resource use from the perspective of the NHS and Personal Social Services (PSS). The total number of appointments for each condition was estimated from NHS Digital and was based on the number of primary (n = 230,298,091) and secondary (n = 22,839,832) care visits, and the proportion of visits due to each condition (informed by clinical opinion). Work and school days lost were also modelled to estimate the wider indirect costs associated with preventable absences due to delays in receiving treatment. Deterministic sensitivity and scenario analyses were also conducted to estimate the uncertainty associated with the analysis.

Results: The use of self-care with ibuprofen was increased by 5% in the base case analysis. The results indicate that this increase could prevent 409,243 appointments in the United Kingdom over a one-year time horizon. 882,875 and 117,114 work and school hours lost could also be prevented, respectively. Sensitivity analysis suggests the magnitude of change in self-care, average working hours/pay and appointment waiting times are the main drivers of the model results.

Conclusion: Self-care with ibuprofen provides opportunity cost-savings to the NHS and frees up the capacity of healthcare professionals so that they can focus on more severe conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信