健康状况报告的变化:三角混合方法数据评估南非农村老年人主要照顾者的健康和福祉。

IF 1 Q3 GERONTOLOGY
Michelle Brear, Themby Nkovana, Guy Harling, Lenore Manderson
{"title":"健康状况报告的变化:三角混合方法数据评估南非农村老年人主要照顾者的健康和福祉。","authors":"Michelle Brear, Themby Nkovana, Guy Harling, Lenore Manderson","doi":"10.1007/s10823-025-09545-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Caregivers' health status is important, given its importance for their own wellbeing and capacity to provide quality care. While single item self-rated health questions in surveys are an efficient measure, responses limit understanding of what people mean when they rate their health in a particular way, and do not address reporting heterogeneity. We draw on data collected in a mixed-method study on the informal caregiving of older people in rural northeast South Africa, which including a standard cross-sectional quantitative survey, an ethnographic survey, and longitudinal ethnographic observations. Results indicate that who becomes the caregiver, and the form of care provided, are influenced primarily by conventional expectations of gender, age, and kinship, and of caregiving alternatives. Caregivers invoke the social circumstances in which they provide care when describing and rating their own health and ability to care, and in determining what conditions they include or dismiss as indicators of health or illness. Social context influences respondents' evaluation of own health and capacity to care, future ability and needs, including as reported in response to different methods. We advocate carefully constructing health condition response categories to include functional impairments and to be informed by context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variation in Health Status Reports: Triangulating Mixed Methods Data to Assess the Health and Wellbeing of Primary Caregivers to Older Rural South Africans.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Brear, Themby Nkovana, Guy Harling, Lenore Manderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10823-025-09545-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Caregivers' health status is important, given its importance for their own wellbeing and capacity to provide quality care. While single item self-rated health questions in surveys are an efficient measure, responses limit understanding of what people mean when they rate their health in a particular way, and do not address reporting heterogeneity. We draw on data collected in a mixed-method study on the informal caregiving of older people in rural northeast South Africa, which including a standard cross-sectional quantitative survey, an ethnographic survey, and longitudinal ethnographic observations. Results indicate that who becomes the caregiver, and the form of care provided, are influenced primarily by conventional expectations of gender, age, and kinship, and of caregiving alternatives. Caregivers invoke the social circumstances in which they provide care when describing and rating their own health and ability to care, and in determining what conditions they include or dismiss as indicators of health or illness. Social context influences respondents' evaluation of own health and capacity to care, future ability and needs, including as reported in response to different methods. We advocate carefully constructing health condition response categories to include functional impairments and to be informed by context.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-025-09545-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-025-09545-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

照顾者的健康状况很重要,因为它对他们自己的福祉和提供优质护理的能力很重要。虽然调查中的单项自评健康问题是一种有效的措施,但回答限制了对人们以特定方式评价自己健康时的含义的理解,并且不能解决报告的异质性。我们利用了一项关于南非东北部农村老年人非正式护理的混合方法研究中收集的数据,其中包括标准横断面定量调查、民族志调查和纵向民族志观察。结果表明,谁成为照顾者,以及所提供的照顾形式,主要受性别、年龄、亲属关系和照顾选择的传统期望的影响。照料者在描述和评价自己的健康和照料能力时,以及在确定将哪些条件作为健康或疾病的指标纳入或排除时,援引了他们提供照料的社会环境。社会环境影响应答者对自身健康和护理能力、未来能力和需求的评价,包括对不同方法的反应。我们提倡仔细构建健康状况反应类别,以包括功能障碍,并根据具体情况提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variation in Health Status Reports: Triangulating Mixed Methods Data to Assess the Health and Wellbeing of Primary Caregivers to Older Rural South Africans.

Caregivers' health status is important, given its importance for their own wellbeing and capacity to provide quality care. While single item self-rated health questions in surveys are an efficient measure, responses limit understanding of what people mean when they rate their health in a particular way, and do not address reporting heterogeneity. We draw on data collected in a mixed-method study on the informal caregiving of older people in rural northeast South Africa, which including a standard cross-sectional quantitative survey, an ethnographic survey, and longitudinal ethnographic observations. Results indicate that who becomes the caregiver, and the form of care provided, are influenced primarily by conventional expectations of gender, age, and kinship, and of caregiving alternatives. Caregivers invoke the social circumstances in which they provide care when describing and rating their own health and ability to care, and in determining what conditions they include or dismiss as indicators of health or illness. Social context influences respondents' evaluation of own health and capacity to care, future ability and needs, including as reported in response to different methods. We advocate carefully constructing health condition response categories to include functional impairments and to be informed by context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology is an international and interdisciplinary journal providing a forum for scholarly discussion of the aging process and issues of the aged throughout the world. The journal emphasizes discussions of research findings, theoretical issues, and applied approaches and provides a comparative orientation to the study of aging in cultural contexts The core of the journal comprises a broad range of articles dealing with global aging, written from the perspectives of history, anthropology, sociology, political science, psychology, population studies, health/biology, etc. We welcome articles that examine aging within a particular cultural context, compare aging and older adults across societies, and/or compare sub-cultural groupings or ethnic minorities within or across larger societies. Comparative analyses of topics relating to older adults, such as aging within socialist vs. capitalist systems or within societies with different social service delivery systems, also are appropriate for this journal. With societies becoming ever more multicultural and experiencing a `graying'' of their population on a hitherto unprecedented scale, the Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology stands at the forefront of one of the most pressing issues of our times.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信