严重烧伤患者的液体管理方法:叙述性回顾。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yi Yao, Tianzhen Hua, Yucong Li, Meiqing Zhang, Wei Liu
{"title":"严重烧伤患者的液体管理方法:叙述性回顾。","authors":"Yi Yao, Tianzhen Hua, Yucong Li, Meiqing Zhang, Wei Liu","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01365-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Yi Yao, Tianzhen Hua, Yucong Li, Meiqing Zhang, Wei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-025-01365-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01365-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01365-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤休克是严重烧伤患者治疗的主要早期并发症,准确及时的输液管理对生存至关重要。传统的临床指标如尿量、血压、中心静脉压(CVP)、血乳酸等是常用的指标,但各指标都有明显的局限性。有创血流动力学监测技术,如肺动脉导管(PAC)和脉搏轮廓心输出量(PiCCO),提高了液体评估的准确性,但存在感染和手术并发症的风险,需要有经验的临床医生根据患者的整体情况进行解释。基于非侵入性超声的方法,包括重症监护超声检查和静脉超声评分(VExUS),正在成为有希望的替代方法,特别是在资源有限的情况下。本文综述了目前严重烧伤患者的液体管理方法,重点介绍了液体反应性和液体耐受性的概念,并为临床实践提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fluid management methods for severely burned patients: a narrative review.

Burn shock is a major early complication in the treatment of severely burned patients, and precise and timely fluid management is essential for survival. Traditional clinical indicators such as urine output, blood pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and blood lactate are commonly used, but each has significant limitations. Invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies, such as Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC) and Pulse Contour Cardiac Output (PiCCO), have improved the accuracy of fluid assessment, but carry risks of infection and procedural complications and require experienced clinical interpretation within the context of the patient's overall condition. Non-invasive ultrasound-based methods, including critical care ultrasonography and the Venous Excess Ultrasound Score (VExUS), are emerging as promising alternatives, particularly in resource-limited settings. This review summarizes current methods for fluid management in severely burned patients, with a focus on the concepts of fluid responsiveness and fluid tolerance, and provides recommendations for clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信