剑桥肾脏一站式肿块调查诊所(CkOSMIC):一项非随机可行性研究。

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Chiara Re, James P Blackmur, Teele Kuusk, Thomas J Mitchell, James N Armitage, Antony C P Riddick, Lorraine Starling, Hannah Fox, Vineetha Thankappan Nair, Sue Norman, Claire Gilby, James O Jones, Brent O'Carrigan, Tristan Barrett, Robert Bakewell, Teikchoon See, Nicholas Hilliard, Simon Hilliard, Akash Prashar, Nadeem Shaida, Alopa Malaviya, Sona Appukutty, Ana Silva, Elena Cresci, Anne Y Warren, Grant D Stewart
{"title":"剑桥肾脏一站式肿块调查诊所(CkOSMIC):一项非随机可行性研究。","authors":"Chiara Re, James P Blackmur, Teele Kuusk, Thomas J Mitchell, James N Armitage, Antony C P Riddick, Lorraine Starling, Hannah Fox, Vineetha Thankappan Nair, Sue Norman, Claire Gilby, James O Jones, Brent O'Carrigan, Tristan Barrett, Robert Bakewell, Teikchoon See, Nicholas Hilliard, Simon Hilliard, Akash Prashar, Nadeem Shaida, Alopa Malaviya, Sona Appukutty, Ana Silva, Elena Cresci, Anne Y Warren, Grant D Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop renal mass biopsy (RMB) clinic at which same-day biopsy results were facilitated by the use of confocal microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cambridge kidney One-Stop Mass Investigation Clinic (CkOSMIC) was established in January 2024. Patients underwent an ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy, and the sample was assessed via a confocal laser microscopy scan, which provided results within minutes. Traditional histopathology processing was also conducted. A historical cohort of patients who underwent RMB according to the standard pathology pathway was used as the comparator. We assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy, as well as the acceptability among patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, CkOSMIC US-guided biopsy was conducted in 50 patients over a period of 12 mo, of whom 48 received a provisional diagnosis immediately. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of malignancy were 94% (29/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79-98%) and 100% (17/17; 95% CI 82-100%), respectively. There was complete agreement between confocal and final pathology for 91.7% (n = 44) of the patients, and partial concordance (cancer identified but equivocal histological subtype) for 8.3% (n = 4). Time from first consultation to a treatment decision, and time from biopsy to a treatment decision were significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (25 d, interquartile range [IQR] 15-42) than in the standard pathway (55 d, IQR 41-77; p < 0.001). Time from biopsy to a treatment decision was also significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (0 d) than in the standard pathway (24 d, IQR 17-34; p < 0.001). All participants were \"satisfied\" or \"very satisfied\" with the pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CkOSMIC was feasible and showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing cancer, while being safe and acceptable. It allows cancer targets to be met, reduces hospital visits and potentially reduces anxiety of delays in forming a treatment plan.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cambridge kidney One-Stop Mass Investigation Clinic (CkOSMIC): A Nonrandomised Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Chiara Re, James P Blackmur, Teele Kuusk, Thomas J Mitchell, James N Armitage, Antony C P Riddick, Lorraine Starling, Hannah Fox, Vineetha Thankappan Nair, Sue Norman, Claire Gilby, James O Jones, Brent O'Carrigan, Tristan Barrett, Robert Bakewell, Teikchoon See, Nicholas Hilliard, Simon Hilliard, Akash Prashar, Nadeem Shaida, Alopa Malaviya, Sona Appukutty, Ana Silva, Elena Cresci, Anne Y Warren, Grant D Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop renal mass biopsy (RMB) clinic at which same-day biopsy results were facilitated by the use of confocal microscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Cambridge kidney One-Stop Mass Investigation Clinic (CkOSMIC) was established in January 2024. Patients underwent an ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy, and the sample was assessed via a confocal laser microscopy scan, which provided results within minutes. Traditional histopathology processing was also conducted. A historical cohort of patients who underwent RMB according to the standard pathology pathway was used as the comparator. We assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy, as well as the acceptability among patients and clinicians.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, CkOSMIC US-guided biopsy was conducted in 50 patients over a period of 12 mo, of whom 48 received a provisional diagnosis immediately. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of malignancy were 94% (29/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79-98%) and 100% (17/17; 95% CI 82-100%), respectively. There was complete agreement between confocal and final pathology for 91.7% (n = 44) of the patients, and partial concordance (cancer identified but equivocal histological subtype) for 8.3% (n = 4). Time from first consultation to a treatment decision, and time from biopsy to a treatment decision were significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (25 d, interquartile range [IQR] 15-42) than in the standard pathway (55 d, IQR 41-77; p < 0.001). Time from biopsy to a treatment decision was also significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (0 d) than in the standard pathway (24 d, IQR 17-34; p < 0.001). All participants were \\\"satisfied\\\" or \\\"very satisfied\\\" with the pathway.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>CkOSMIC was feasible and showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing cancer, while being safe and acceptable. It allows cancer targets to be met, reduces hospital visits and potentially reduces anxiety of delays in forming a treatment plan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European urology oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European urology oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.09.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:我们的目的是评估一站式肾肿块活检(RMB)诊所的可行性和结果,在该诊所,使用共聚焦显微镜可以方便地进行当日活检。方法:剑桥肾脏一站式肿块检查诊所(ccosmic)于2024年1月成立。患者接受超声(US)引导活检,并通过共聚焦激光显微镜扫描评估样本,该扫描在几分钟内提供结果。同时进行传统的组织病理学处理。根据标准病理途径进行RMB的历史队列患者作为比较。我们评估了可行性、安全性和诊断准确性,以及患者和临床医生的可接受性。主要发现和局限性:总体而言,在12个月的时间内,对50例患者进行了CkOSMIC us引导活检,其中48例立即接受了临时诊断。鉴别恶性肿瘤的敏感性和特异性分别为94%(29/31;95%可信区间[CI] 79-98%)和100% (17/17;95% CI 82-100%)。91.7% (n = 44)的患者共焦和最终病理完全一致,8.3% (n = 4)的患者部分一致(癌症确诊但组织学亚型不明确)。CkOSMIC途径从首次会诊到做出治疗决定的时间,以及从活检到做出治疗决定的时间(25 d,四分位间距[IQR] 15-42)明显短于标准途径(55 d, IQR 41-77); p结论及临床意义:CkOSMIC是可行的,在诊断癌症方面具有较高的敏感性和特异性,同时是安全可接受的。它可以达到癌症目标,减少医院就诊,并可能减少对制定治疗计划延误的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cambridge kidney One-Stop Mass Investigation Clinic (CkOSMIC): A Nonrandomised Feasibility Study.

Background and objective: Our aim was to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a one-stop renal mass biopsy (RMB) clinic at which same-day biopsy results were facilitated by the use of confocal microscopy.

Methods: The Cambridge kidney One-Stop Mass Investigation Clinic (CkOSMIC) was established in January 2024. Patients underwent an ultrasound (US)-guided biopsy, and the sample was assessed via a confocal laser microscopy scan, which provided results within minutes. Traditional histopathology processing was also conducted. A historical cohort of patients who underwent RMB according to the standard pathology pathway was used as the comparator. We assessed the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic accuracy, as well as the acceptability among patients and clinicians.

Key findings and limitations: Overall, CkOSMIC US-guided biopsy was conducted in 50 patients over a period of 12 mo, of whom 48 received a provisional diagnosis immediately. The sensitivity and specificity for identification of malignancy were 94% (29/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 79-98%) and 100% (17/17; 95% CI 82-100%), respectively. There was complete agreement between confocal and final pathology for 91.7% (n = 44) of the patients, and partial concordance (cancer identified but equivocal histological subtype) for 8.3% (n = 4). Time from first consultation to a treatment decision, and time from biopsy to a treatment decision were significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (25 d, interquartile range [IQR] 15-42) than in the standard pathway (55 d, IQR 41-77; p < 0.001). Time from biopsy to a treatment decision was also significantly shorter in the CkOSMIC pathway (0 d) than in the standard pathway (24 d, IQR 17-34; p < 0.001). All participants were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with the pathway.

Conclusions and clinical implications: CkOSMIC was feasible and showed high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing cancer, while being safe and acceptable. It allows cancer targets to be met, reduces hospital visits and potentially reduces anxiety of delays in forming a treatment plan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信