2010 - 2025年FDA对生物制剂的警告信回顾分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Prarthana Radhakrishnan, Dhanabal SP, Ganesh GNK
{"title":"2010 - 2025年FDA对生物制剂的警告信回顾分析","authors":"Prarthana Radhakrishnan,&nbsp;Dhanabal SP,&nbsp;Ganesh GNK","doi":"10.1007/s12247-025-10123-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To lawfully market any drug products, biosimilars, or vaccines in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must provide a valid license or approval. The FDA takes full responsibility for protecting public health by regulating food and drug substances for their purity, safety, and efficacy. Biologics or biopharmaceuticals represent a rapidly growing field due to recent technological advancements and their targeted therapy advantages. To maintain the quality and safety of approved drugs, the FDA conducts periodic inspections.</p><p>This study aims to analyze the causes and trends of warning letters issued to biologics for current good manufacturing practices (CGMP) and Data integrity violations during 2010–2025, and provide preventive measures to impart knowledge to drug developers, thereby avoiding warning letters.</p><p>The warning letters issued from 2010 to 2025 were pulled from the FDA Compliance and Inspection Dashboard on the FDA website. Complete details on the manufacturer, country, nature of the violation, and other related details were obtained from the warning letter and thoroughly analyzed, summarized, tabulated, and concluded on the most common violations.</p><p>The study reveals that most violations are related to CGMP issues, including compromised data integrity and misbranding. In-depth analysis of CGMP warning letters in the study revealed three major repeated violations, namely, written procedure deviations, stability testing, and gaps in production record review by QC, corresponding to 17%, 15%, and 14%, respectively.</p><p>Review of warning letter analysis depicts that the FDA’s major enforcement actions are on CGMP Violations. Manufacturers should understand the importance and develop an internal checklist to follow the same, improve documentation practices with the latest technology, and conduct regular applicable training, to avoid any possible actions. The globalisation and advancements in technology should be used wisely to plan an upgraded quality management system on par with current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":656,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","volume":"20 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Retrospective Analysis of FDA Warning Letters Issued For Biologics From 2010 To 2025\",\"authors\":\"Prarthana Radhakrishnan,&nbsp;Dhanabal SP,&nbsp;Ganesh GNK\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12247-025-10123-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To lawfully market any drug products, biosimilars, or vaccines in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must provide a valid license or approval. The FDA takes full responsibility for protecting public health by regulating food and drug substances for their purity, safety, and efficacy. Biologics or biopharmaceuticals represent a rapidly growing field due to recent technological advancements and their targeted therapy advantages. To maintain the quality and safety of approved drugs, the FDA conducts periodic inspections.</p><p>This study aims to analyze the causes and trends of warning letters issued to biologics for current good manufacturing practices (CGMP) and Data integrity violations during 2010–2025, and provide preventive measures to impart knowledge to drug developers, thereby avoiding warning letters.</p><p>The warning letters issued from 2010 to 2025 were pulled from the FDA Compliance and Inspection Dashboard on the FDA website. Complete details on the manufacturer, country, nature of the violation, and other related details were obtained from the warning letter and thoroughly analyzed, summarized, tabulated, and concluded on the most common violations.</p><p>The study reveals that most violations are related to CGMP issues, including compromised data integrity and misbranding. In-depth analysis of CGMP warning letters in the study revealed three major repeated violations, namely, written procedure deviations, stability testing, and gaps in production record review by QC, corresponding to 17%, 15%, and 14%, respectively.</p><p>Review of warning letter analysis depicts that the FDA’s major enforcement actions are on CGMP Violations. Manufacturers should understand the importance and develop an internal checklist to follow the same, improve documentation practices with the latest technology, and conduct regular applicable training, to avoid any possible actions. The globalisation and advancements in technology should be used wisely to plan an upgraded quality management system on par with current guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10123-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12247-025-10123-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要在美国合法销售任何药品、生物仿制药或疫苗,食品和药物管理局(FDA)必须提供有效的许可证或批准。FDA通过监管食品和药品的纯度、安全性和有效性,全权负责保护公众健康。由于最近的技术进步和它们的靶向治疗优势,生物制剂或生物制药代表了一个快速增长的领域。为了保证已批准药品的质量和安全性,FDA进行定期检查。本研究旨在分析2010-2025年间生物制剂因违反现行良好生产规范(CGMP)和数据完整性而发出警告信的原因和趋势,并提供预防措施,向药品开发人员传授知识,从而避免发出警告信。2010年至2025年发布的警告信是从FDA网站上的FDA合规和检查仪表板上删除的。从警告信中获得了有关制造商、国家、违规性质和其他相关细节的完整详细信息,并对最常见的违规行为进行了彻底的分析、总结、制表和总结。该研究显示,大多数违规行为与CGMP问题有关,包括数据完整性受损和标签错误。本研究对CGMP警告信进行深入分析,发现三种主要的重复违规行为,分别是书面程序偏差、稳定性检测和QC审核生产记录的空白,分别占17%、15%和14%。警告信分析表明,FDA的主要执法行动是针对违反CGMP的行为。制造商应了解其重要性,并制定内部检查表,以遵循相同的检查表,使用最新技术改进文档实践,并进行定期适用的培训,以避免任何可能的行动。应明智地利用全球化和科技的进步,规划一个升级的质量管理体系,与现行的指导方针相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Retrospective Analysis of FDA Warning Letters Issued For Biologics From 2010 To 2025

To lawfully market any drug products, biosimilars, or vaccines in the United States, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) must provide a valid license or approval. The FDA takes full responsibility for protecting public health by regulating food and drug substances for their purity, safety, and efficacy. Biologics or biopharmaceuticals represent a rapidly growing field due to recent technological advancements and their targeted therapy advantages. To maintain the quality and safety of approved drugs, the FDA conducts periodic inspections.

This study aims to analyze the causes and trends of warning letters issued to biologics for current good manufacturing practices (CGMP) and Data integrity violations during 2010–2025, and provide preventive measures to impart knowledge to drug developers, thereby avoiding warning letters.

The warning letters issued from 2010 to 2025 were pulled from the FDA Compliance and Inspection Dashboard on the FDA website. Complete details on the manufacturer, country, nature of the violation, and other related details were obtained from the warning letter and thoroughly analyzed, summarized, tabulated, and concluded on the most common violations.

The study reveals that most violations are related to CGMP issues, including compromised data integrity and misbranding. In-depth analysis of CGMP warning letters in the study revealed three major repeated violations, namely, written procedure deviations, stability testing, and gaps in production record review by QC, corresponding to 17%, 15%, and 14%, respectively.

Review of warning letter analysis depicts that the FDA’s major enforcement actions are on CGMP Violations. Manufacturers should understand the importance and develop an internal checklist to follow the same, improve documentation practices with the latest technology, and conduct regular applicable training, to avoid any possible actions. The globalisation and advancements in technology should be used wisely to plan an upgraded quality management system on par with current guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation (JPI), is an international, multidisciplinary peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to publishing high quality papers emphasizing innovative research and applied technologies within the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. JPI''s goal is to be the premier communication vehicle for the critical body of knowledge that is needed for scientific evolution and technical innovation, from R&D to market. Topics will fall under the following categories: Materials science, Product design, Process design, optimization, automation and control, Facilities; Information management, Regulatory policy and strategy, Supply chain developments , Education and professional development, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation publishes four issues a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信