{"title":"大衰退时期资产相互依赖的动态","authors":"Alan Chernoff","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"167 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dynamics of Asset Interdependence in the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"Alan Chernoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"167 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Dynamics of Asset Interdependence in the Great Recession
Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.
期刊介绍:
The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J