大衰退时期资产相互依赖的动态

IF 0.8 Q4 ECONOMICS
Alan Chernoff
{"title":"大衰退时期资产相互依赖的动态","authors":"Alan Chernoff","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"167 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Dynamics of Asset Interdependence in the Great Recession\",\"authors\":\"Alan Chernoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"167 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09829-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在2007-2008年金融危机期间,金融资产之间的相关性是从业人员和学者感兴趣的话题,因为在危机期间,以前认为不相关的类别之间的相关性增加对投资组合多样化具有负面影响。先前的研究认为,整个危机期间相关性的上升是流动性的结果。本文旨在重新审视这些结果,并通过检查美联储经济数据数据库和雅虎财经的日常数据来检验相关性上升的证据。以异方差为条件的股票和房地产收益的相关系数相互比较,也与票据、票据和债券收益率进行比较。通过考察2007-2008年金融危机前、期间和之后两年的跨资产相关性,危机期间跨资产相关性的上升可归因于当时金融市场波动性的上升,而不是由于资产类别之间潜在联系的上升。波动性的上升可能与2007-2008年金融危机导致的流动性缺乏有关,并支持了低流动性、高波动性和高测量相关性之间更广泛的理论关系。这些发现表明,在危机期间旨在恢复市场流动性的政策干预不仅有助于稳定波动性,还有助于稳定投资者对多元化策略的信心。分散投资的失败可能只是反映了暂时的波动性扭曲,而不是资产类别分离的结构性失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Dynamics of Asset Interdependence in the Great Recession

Correlation among financial assets during the 2007–2008 financial crisis is a topic of interest among practitioners and academics, as the increase in correlation among previously considered uncorrelated classes during the crisis has negative implications for portfolio diversification. Previous research considered the rise in correlation throughout the crisis to be a result of liquidity. This paper aims to reexamine those results and test for evidence that a rise in correlation can be found by examining daily data from the Federal Reserve Economic Data database and Yahoo Finance. Correlation coefficients conditional on heteroskedasticity for stock and real estate returns are compared with each other, as well as with bill, note, and bond yields. By examining cross-asset correlations during the two years prior, during, and after the 2007–2008 financial crisis, the rise in cross-asset correlation during the crisis period can be attributed to a rise in volatility in financial markets at that time, and not due to a rise in the underlying linkage between asset classes. This rise in volatility can be linked to the lack of liquidity from the 2007–2008 financial crisis and supports a broader theoretical relationship between low liquidity, high volatility, and elevated measured correlations. These findings suggest that policy interventions aimed at restoring market liquidity during crises can help stabilize not only volatility but also investor confidence in diversification strategies. Perceived breakdowns in diversification may only be reflecting temporary volatility distortions, rather than structural failures in asset class separation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信