{"title":"收入不平等与美国水质:经济差异与环境结果的实证分析","authors":"Hale Kirer Silva Lecuna, Billur Cohen","doi":"10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study analyzes the relationship between income inequality and water pollution in the United States. Unlike prior studies that rely on cross-country comparisons or primarily focus on air pollution, this study makes a novel contribution by examining how income inequality influences water pollution over time within the United States, providing insights relevant to national policy interventions. Using the autoregressive distributed lag model, both the short- and long-run effects of urbanization, income, and income inequality on water quality are examined. The analysis employs nationally aggregated data spanning from 1969 to 2020, using dissolved oxygen as the primary indicator of water quality. Data sources include the United States Census Bureau, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and the Global Environmental Monitoring System. Our results indicate that a more equitable distribution of income has adverse effects on water quality in the long term. Conversely, the proportion of income accounted for by the top five percent of the population and urbanization both have adverse impacts on water quality, suggesting that income concentration at the top and fast urban growth are responsible for worsening water conditions. Increases in gross domestic product per capita improve water quality both in the short and long run. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring environmental policy to account for disparities in income structure. Improving water infrastructure in less affluent communities and regulating pollution-intensive activities in high-income areas could help mitigate inequality-driven environmental risks and support public health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46061,"journal":{"name":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","volume":"53 3","pages":"197 - 212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Income Inequality and Water Quality in the U.S.: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Disparities and Environmental Outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Hale Kirer Silva Lecuna, Billur Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study analyzes the relationship between income inequality and water pollution in the United States. Unlike prior studies that rely on cross-country comparisons or primarily focus on air pollution, this study makes a novel contribution by examining how income inequality influences water pollution over time within the United States, providing insights relevant to national policy interventions. Using the autoregressive distributed lag model, both the short- and long-run effects of urbanization, income, and income inequality on water quality are examined. The analysis employs nationally aggregated data spanning from 1969 to 2020, using dissolved oxygen as the primary indicator of water quality. Data sources include the United States Census Bureau, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and the Global Environmental Monitoring System. Our results indicate that a more equitable distribution of income has adverse effects on water quality in the long term. Conversely, the proportion of income accounted for by the top five percent of the population and urbanization both have adverse impacts on water quality, suggesting that income concentration at the top and fast urban growth are responsible for worsening water conditions. Increases in gross domestic product per capita improve water quality both in the short and long run. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring environmental policy to account for disparities in income structure. Improving water infrastructure in less affluent communities and regulating pollution-intensive activities in high-income areas could help mitigate inequality-driven environmental risks and support public health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"volume\":\"53 3\",\"pages\":\"197 - 212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ATLANTIC ECONOMIC JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11293-025-09827-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Income Inequality and Water Quality in the U.S.: An Empirical Analysis of Economic Disparities and Environmental Outcomes
This study analyzes the relationship between income inequality and water pollution in the United States. Unlike prior studies that rely on cross-country comparisons or primarily focus on air pollution, this study makes a novel contribution by examining how income inequality influences water pollution over time within the United States, providing insights relevant to national policy interventions. Using the autoregressive distributed lag model, both the short- and long-run effects of urbanization, income, and income inequality on water quality are examined. The analysis employs nationally aggregated data spanning from 1969 to 2020, using dissolved oxygen as the primary indicator of water quality. Data sources include the United States Census Bureau, the World Bank, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, and the Global Environmental Monitoring System. Our results indicate that a more equitable distribution of income has adverse effects on water quality in the long term. Conversely, the proportion of income accounted for by the top five percent of the population and urbanization both have adverse impacts on water quality, suggesting that income concentration at the top and fast urban growth are responsible for worsening water conditions. Increases in gross domestic product per capita improve water quality both in the short and long run. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring environmental policy to account for disparities in income structure. Improving water infrastructure in less affluent communities and regulating pollution-intensive activities in high-income areas could help mitigate inequality-driven environmental risks and support public health.
期刊介绍:
The Atlantic Economic Journal (AEJ) has an international reputation for excellent articles in all interest areas, without regard to fields or methodological preferences. Founded in 1973 by the International Atlantic Economic Society, a need was identified for increased communication among scholars from different countries. For over 30 years, the AEJ has continuously sought articles that traced some of the most critical economic changes and developments to occur on the global level. The journal''s goal is to facilitate and synthesize economic research across nations to encourage cross-fertilization of ideas and scholarly research. Contributors include some of the world''s most respected economists and financial specialists, including Nobel laureates and leading government officials. AEJ welcomes both theoretical and empirical articles, as well as public policy papers. All manuscripts are submitted to a double-blind peer review process. In addition to formal publication of full-length articles, the AEJ provides an opportunity for less formal communication through its Anthology section. A small point may not be worthy of a full-length, formal paper but is important enough to warrant dissemination to other researchers. Research in progress may be of interest to other scholars in the field. A research approach ending in negative results needs to be shared to save others similar pitfalls. The Anthology section has been established to facilitate these forms of communication. Anthologies provide a means by which short manuscripts of less than 500 words can quickly appear in the AEJ. All submissions are formally reviewed by the Board of Editors. Officially cited as: Atl Econ J