结合多种数据重新采样方法和分类器集成更好的财务困境预测:同质和异质的方法

IF 4.5 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Ya-Han Hu, Chih-Fong Tsai, Pei-Ting Wang
{"title":"结合多种数据重新采样方法和分类器集成更好的财务困境预测:同质和异质的方法","authors":"Ya-Han Hu,&nbsp;Chih-Fong Tsai,&nbsp;Pei-Ting Wang","doi":"10.1007/s10479-025-06706-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Financial distress prediction (FDP) is a critical task for financial institutions and is typically framed as a class imbalance learning problem. To address this challenge, this paper proposes two ensemble-based strategies: the homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches, which combine multiple data re-sampling algorithms to generate diverse re-balanced training sets for classifier construction. Experimental results on seven FDP datasets demonstrate that the heterogeneous approach, which integrates under-, over-, and hybrid sampling methods with their optimal imbalance ratio settings, achieves superior performance in terms of AUC, particularly when applied with the LightGBM and XGBoost classifiers. Regarding Type I error, the heterogeneous combinations consistently outperform the homogeneous and other baseline approaches across various classifiers. The generalizability of the proposed methods is further validated using 37 additional class-imbalanced datasets from different domains, where the heterogeneous approach again shows the most robust performance. These findings suggest that the proposed models can serve as effective decision support tools for financial institutions to enhance credit risk evaluation and lending strategies. From a policy perspective, adopting such predictive frameworks can improve financial stability by reducing exposure to high-risk loans and enabling more accurate early warning systems for economic distress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"353 2","pages":"793 - 814"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining multiple data resampling methods and classifier ensembles for better financial distress prediction: homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches\",\"authors\":\"Ya-Han Hu,&nbsp;Chih-Fong Tsai,&nbsp;Pei-Ting Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10479-025-06706-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Financial distress prediction (FDP) is a critical task for financial institutions and is typically framed as a class imbalance learning problem. To address this challenge, this paper proposes two ensemble-based strategies: the homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches, which combine multiple data re-sampling algorithms to generate diverse re-balanced training sets for classifier construction. Experimental results on seven FDP datasets demonstrate that the heterogeneous approach, which integrates under-, over-, and hybrid sampling methods with their optimal imbalance ratio settings, achieves superior performance in terms of AUC, particularly when applied with the LightGBM and XGBoost classifiers. Regarding Type I error, the heterogeneous combinations consistently outperform the homogeneous and other baseline approaches across various classifiers. The generalizability of the proposed methods is further validated using 37 additional class-imbalanced datasets from different domains, where the heterogeneous approach again shows the most robust performance. These findings suggest that the proposed models can serve as effective decision support tools for financial institutions to enhance credit risk evaluation and lending strategies. From a policy perspective, adopting such predictive frameworks can improve financial stability by reducing exposure to high-risk loans and enabling more accurate early warning systems for economic distress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"volume\":\"353 2\",\"pages\":\"793 - 814\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Operations Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-025-06706-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-025-06706-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

财务困境预测(FDP)是金融机构的一项重要任务,通常被认为是一个阶级失衡学习问题。为了解决这一挑战,本文提出了两种基于集成的策略:同质和异构方法,它们结合多种数据重采样算法来生成用于分类器构建的不同的再平衡训练集。在7个FDP数据集上的实验结果表明,异构方法结合了欠采样、过采样和混合采样方法及其最佳不平衡比设置,在AUC方面取得了卓越的性能,特别是在与LightGBM和XGBoost分类器应用时。关于类型I错误,异构组合在各种分类器中始终优于同质和其他基线方法。使用来自不同领域的37个额外的类不平衡数据集进一步验证了所提出方法的泛化性,其中异构方法再次显示出最稳健的性能。这些研究结果表明,所提出的模型可以作为金融机构有效的决策支持工具,以加强信贷风险评估和贷款策略。从政策角度来看,采用这种预测框架可以通过减少高风险贷款的风险和建立更准确的经济困境预警系统来改善金融稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Combining multiple data resampling methods and classifier ensembles for better financial distress prediction: homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches

Combining multiple data resampling methods and classifier ensembles for better financial distress prediction: homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches

Financial distress prediction (FDP) is a critical task for financial institutions and is typically framed as a class imbalance learning problem. To address this challenge, this paper proposes two ensemble-based strategies: the homogeneous and heterogeneous approaches, which combine multiple data re-sampling algorithms to generate diverse re-balanced training sets for classifier construction. Experimental results on seven FDP datasets demonstrate that the heterogeneous approach, which integrates under-, over-, and hybrid sampling methods with their optimal imbalance ratio settings, achieves superior performance in terms of AUC, particularly when applied with the LightGBM and XGBoost classifiers. Regarding Type I error, the heterogeneous combinations consistently outperform the homogeneous and other baseline approaches across various classifiers. The generalizability of the proposed methods is further validated using 37 additional class-imbalanced datasets from different domains, where the heterogeneous approach again shows the most robust performance. These findings suggest that the proposed models can serve as effective decision support tools for financial institutions to enhance credit risk evaluation and lending strategies. From a policy perspective, adopting such predictive frameworks can improve financial stability by reducing exposure to high-risk loans and enabling more accurate early warning systems for economic distress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信