一项探讨格鲁吉亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍的定性研究。

GBMN Georgian biomedical news Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.52340/gbmn.2024.01.01.89
Ana Dekanosidze, Veriko Gegenava, Levan Liluashvili, Lela Sturua, Michelle C Kegler, Levan Baramidze, Nino Kiladze, Carla J Berg
{"title":"一项探讨格鲁吉亚实施无烟家庭的促进因素和障碍的定性研究。","authors":"Ana Dekanosidze, Veriko Gegenava, Levan Liluashvili, Lela Sturua, Michelle C Kegler, Levan Baramidze, Nino Kiladze, Carla J Berg","doi":"10.52340/gbmn.2024.01.01.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Georgia is a middle-income country with high male smoking rates and recently implemented public smoke-free policies. In contexts like Georgia, smoke-free homes (SFHs) can play crucial roles in reducing secondhand smoke exposure and use prevalence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined barriers and facilitators to SFHs among Georgian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted separately with smoking and nonsmoking adults in 2 rural communities (n=25; Mage=42.92, 52.0% female, 48.0% married). Data were examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smoking participants (n=13) were primarily (84.6%) male; nonsmoking participants (n=12) were primarily (91.7%) female. Despite 72.2% reporting complete SFH restrictions, several exceptions and implementation challenges were noted. Smoking was commonly allowed for certain people (e.g., guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g., kitchen, balcony). Salient challenges included prevalent male smoking, difficulty changing behavior (smoking in general and smoking in the home), noncompliance, and accommodating guests, older extended family members, and important traditions and celebrations. However, important SFH motives were the health of non-smokers, particularly children, and serving as good role models for children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective SFH interventions for Georgian households must address specific characteristics (e.g., high male smoking rates, hospitality, accommodating important traditions) and may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":521091,"journal":{"name":"GBMN Georgian biomedical news","volume":"2 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Dekanosidze, Veriko Gegenava, Levan Liluashvili, Lela Sturua, Michelle C Kegler, Levan Baramidze, Nino Kiladze, Carla J Berg\",\"doi\":\"10.52340/gbmn.2024.01.01.89\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Georgia is a middle-income country with high male smoking rates and recently implemented public smoke-free policies. In contexts like Georgia, smoke-free homes (SFHs) can play crucial roles in reducing secondhand smoke exposure and use prevalence.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study examined barriers and facilitators to SFHs among Georgian adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted separately with smoking and nonsmoking adults in 2 rural communities (n=25; Mage=42.92, 52.0% female, 48.0% married). Data were examined using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Smoking participants (n=13) were primarily (84.6%) male; nonsmoking participants (n=12) were primarily (91.7%) female. Despite 72.2% reporting complete SFH restrictions, several exceptions and implementation challenges were noted. Smoking was commonly allowed for certain people (e.g., guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g., kitchen, balcony). Salient challenges included prevalent male smoking, difficulty changing behavior (smoking in general and smoking in the home), noncompliance, and accommodating guests, older extended family members, and important traditions and celebrations. However, important SFH motives were the health of non-smokers, particularly children, and serving as good role models for children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effective SFH interventions for Georgian households must address specific characteristics (e.g., high male smoking rates, hospitality, accommodating important traditions) and may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":521091,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GBMN Georgian biomedical news\",\"volume\":\"2 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516189/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GBMN Georgian biomedical news\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52340/gbmn.2024.01.01.89\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GBMN Georgian biomedical news","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52340/gbmn.2024.01.01.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:格鲁吉亚是一个中等收入国家,男性吸烟率高,最近实施了公共无烟政策。在格鲁吉亚这样的情况下,无烟家庭在减少二手烟暴露和使用方面发挥着至关重要的作用。目的:本研究调查了格鲁吉亚成年人SFHs的障碍和促进因素。方法:于2024年2 - 3月在2个农村社区分别对吸烟和不吸烟的成年人进行焦点小组调查(n=25,年龄42.92,女性52.0%,已婚48.0%)。使用专题分析对数据进行了审查。结果:吸烟参与者(n=13)主要为男性(84.6%);非吸烟参与者(n=12)主要为女性(91.7%)。尽管72.2%的受访者报告了完全的SFH限制,但也注意到一些例外情况和实施方面的挑战。某些人(如客人)或房间/空间(如厨房、阳台)通常允许吸烟。突出的挑战包括普遍的男性吸烟,难以改变的行为(一般吸烟和在家里吸烟),不服从,接待客人,年长的大家庭成员,以及重要的传统和庆祝活动。然而,SFH的重要动机是非吸烟者的健康,特别是儿童,并为儿童树立良好的榜样。结论:格鲁吉亚家庭的有效SFH干预措施必须解决具体特点(例如,男性吸烟率高、热情好客、适应重要传统),并可作为具有类似特点的其他国家的典范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Study Exploring Facilitators and Barriers to Implementing Smoke-free Homes in Georgia.

Background: Georgia is a middle-income country with high male smoking rates and recently implemented public smoke-free policies. In contexts like Georgia, smoke-free homes (SFHs) can play crucial roles in reducing secondhand smoke exposure and use prevalence.

Objectives: This study examined barriers and facilitators to SFHs among Georgian adults.

Methods: In February-March 2024, focus groups were conducted separately with smoking and nonsmoking adults in 2 rural communities (n=25; Mage=42.92, 52.0% female, 48.0% married). Data were examined using thematic analysis.

Results: Smoking participants (n=13) were primarily (84.6%) male; nonsmoking participants (n=12) were primarily (91.7%) female. Despite 72.2% reporting complete SFH restrictions, several exceptions and implementation challenges were noted. Smoking was commonly allowed for certain people (e.g., guests) or rooms/spaces (e.g., kitchen, balcony). Salient challenges included prevalent male smoking, difficulty changing behavior (smoking in general and smoking in the home), noncompliance, and accommodating guests, older extended family members, and important traditions and celebrations. However, important SFH motives were the health of non-smokers, particularly children, and serving as good role models for children.

Conclusions: Effective SFH interventions for Georgian households must address specific characteristics (e.g., high male smoking rates, hospitality, accommodating important traditions) and may serve as models for other countries with similar characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信