澳大利亚初级卫生专业人员幼儿健康促进培训试点评价。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eve T. House, Erin Kerr, Sarah Taki, Elizabeth Denney-Wilson, Louise A. Baur, Heilok Cheng, Sharlene Vlahos, Li Ming Wen
{"title":"澳大利亚初级卫生专业人员幼儿健康促进培训试点评价。","authors":"Eve T. House,&nbsp;Erin Kerr,&nbsp;Sarah Taki,&nbsp;Elizabeth Denney-Wilson,&nbsp;Louise A. Baur,&nbsp;Heilok Cheng,&nbsp;Sharlene Vlahos,&nbsp;Li Ming Wen","doi":"10.1002/hpja.70113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online continuing professional development (CPD) program for primary health professionals (PHPs) regarding early childhood nutrition and associated health behaviours.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>An action research approach was used. Process evaluation included webinar observation to identify behaviour change and adult learning techniques used and post-webinar acceptability surveys. Impact evaluation examined changes in knowledge, attitudes, practices and self-efficacy using online surveys before and 1 month following webinars. Interviews with PHPs and facilitators informed process and impact evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-six webinars were delivered from 2022–24, 1246 PHPs registered, and 463 attended live. Facilitation style reflected adult learning principles and incorporated behaviour change techniques targeting knowledge and skill improvement. Facilitators and attendees valued the national scope of the program but highlighted challenges achieving national reach and meeting the needs of a broad audience. Over 90% of attendees provided positive feedback in acceptability surveys; this was reflected in qualitative feedback: attendees enjoyed the practical, interactive content and opportunity to review program material. There was low uptake of effectiveness surveys. In qualitative interviews, PHPs reported intent to change practice; however, the extent of implementation of program content into clinical practice varied.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>CPD regarding early childhood health promotion and obesity prevention was well received by PHPs. Future programs should consider incorporating comprehensive impact evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> So What?</h3>\n \n <p>Findings should inform future program design, including the need for interactive and practical education. Reach and sustainability of future programs may be enhanced through integration into existing education services for PHPs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47379,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","volume":"36 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pilot Evaluation of Early Childhood Health Promotion Training for Primary Health Professionals in Australia\",\"authors\":\"Eve T. House,&nbsp;Erin Kerr,&nbsp;Sarah Taki,&nbsp;Elizabeth Denney-Wilson,&nbsp;Louise A. Baur,&nbsp;Heilok Cheng,&nbsp;Sharlene Vlahos,&nbsp;Li Ming Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hpja.70113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Issue Addressed</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online continuing professional development (CPD) program for primary health professionals (PHPs) regarding early childhood nutrition and associated health behaviours.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>An action research approach was used. Process evaluation included webinar observation to identify behaviour change and adult learning techniques used and post-webinar acceptability surveys. Impact evaluation examined changes in knowledge, attitudes, practices and self-efficacy using online surveys before and 1 month following webinars. Interviews with PHPs and facilitators informed process and impact evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-six webinars were delivered from 2022–24, 1246 PHPs registered, and 463 attended live. Facilitation style reflected adult learning principles and incorporated behaviour change techniques targeting knowledge and skill improvement. Facilitators and attendees valued the national scope of the program but highlighted challenges achieving national reach and meeting the needs of a broad audience. Over 90% of attendees provided positive feedback in acceptability surveys; this was reflected in qualitative feedback: attendees enjoyed the practical, interactive content and opportunity to review program material. There was low uptake of effectiveness surveys. In qualitative interviews, PHPs reported intent to change practice; however, the extent of implementation of program content into clinical practice varied.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>CPD regarding early childhood health promotion and obesity prevention was well received by PHPs. Future programs should consider incorporating comprehensive impact evaluation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> So What?</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings should inform future program design, including the need for interactive and practical education. Reach and sustainability of future programs may be enhanced through integration into existing education services for PHPs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47379,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Journal of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpja.70113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题解决:本研究评估了初级卫生专业人员(PHPs)关于幼儿营养和相关健康行为的在线持续专业发展(CPD)计划的可行性、可接受性和有效性。方法:采用行动研究法。过程评估包括网络研讨会观察,以确定行为改变和使用的成人学习技术,以及网络研讨会后的可接受性调查。影响评估通过网络研讨会前后1个月的在线调查来检查知识、态度、行为和自我效能的变化。与php和促进者的访谈为过程和影响评估提供了信息。结果:从2022年到2024年共举办了36场网络研讨会,注册了1246名php, 463人参加了现场直播。促进风格反映了成人的学习原则,并结合了以知识和技能提高为目标的行为改变技术。主持人和与会者重视该计划的全国范围,但强调了实现全国覆盖和满足广大受众需求的挑战。超过90%的与会者在可接受性调查中给出了积极的反馈;这在定性反馈中得到了反映:与会者喜欢实用、互动的内容,并有机会回顾课程材料。对有效性调查的接受程度很低。在定性访谈中,php报告了改变实践的意图;然而,在临床实践中实施计划内容的程度各不相同。结论:CPD在促进儿童早期健康和预防肥胖方面的作用得到了小学生的认可。未来的方案应考虑纳入综合影响评价。那又怎样?研究结果应为未来的课程设计提供信息,包括互动性和实践性教育的需求。未来项目的覆盖面和可持续性可以通过整合到现有的PHPs教育服务中来增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pilot Evaluation of Early Childhood Health Promotion Training for Primary Health Professionals in Australia

Pilot Evaluation of Early Childhood Health Promotion Training for Primary Health Professionals in Australia

Issue Addressed

This study evaluated the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of an online continuing professional development (CPD) program for primary health professionals (PHPs) regarding early childhood nutrition and associated health behaviours.

Methods

An action research approach was used. Process evaluation included webinar observation to identify behaviour change and adult learning techniques used and post-webinar acceptability surveys. Impact evaluation examined changes in knowledge, attitudes, practices and self-efficacy using online surveys before and 1 month following webinars. Interviews with PHPs and facilitators informed process and impact evaluation.

Results

Thirty-six webinars were delivered from 2022–24, 1246 PHPs registered, and 463 attended live. Facilitation style reflected adult learning principles and incorporated behaviour change techniques targeting knowledge and skill improvement. Facilitators and attendees valued the national scope of the program but highlighted challenges achieving national reach and meeting the needs of a broad audience. Over 90% of attendees provided positive feedback in acceptability surveys; this was reflected in qualitative feedback: attendees enjoyed the practical, interactive content and opportunity to review program material. There was low uptake of effectiveness surveys. In qualitative interviews, PHPs reported intent to change practice; however, the extent of implementation of program content into clinical practice varied.

Conclusions

CPD regarding early childhood health promotion and obesity prevention was well received by PHPs. Future programs should consider incorporating comprehensive impact evaluation.

So What?

Findings should inform future program design, including the need for interactive and practical education. Reach and sustainability of future programs may be enhanced through integration into existing education services for PHPs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Journal of Australia
Health Promotion Journal of Australia PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Health Promotion Journal of Australia is to facilitate communication between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers involved in health promotion activities. Preference for publication is given to practical examples of policies, theories, strategies and programs which utilise educational, organisational, economic and/or environmental approaches to health promotion. The journal also publishes brief reports discussing programs, professional viewpoints, and guidelines for practice or evaluation methodology. The journal features articles, brief reports, editorials, perspectives, "of interest", viewpoints, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信