Drew W Nute, Kavya K Sanghavi, Aviram M Giladi, Kenneth R Means
{"title":"拇指手掌骨关节炎的初步非手术治疗选择。","authors":"Drew W Nute, Kavya K Sanghavi, Aviram M Giladi, Kenneth R Means","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated whether baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with initial treatment choice of hand therapy (HT) or corticosteroid injection (CI). We hypothesized patients with worse baseline PROMs would choose CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have an ongoing prospective study of patients aged 35-85 with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). We track initial treatments and PROMs including visual analog/numerical rating sub-scales (VA/NRS), brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Global Health (GH) modules. Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), and EuroQol are calculated. We retrospectively identified patients from 2019-2022 who initially chose HT or CI. We performed pairwise comparisons of independent variables between HT and CI groups, then exploratory bivariate logistic regression (LR) analyses for independent variables. We then performed more stringent multivariable LR analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 156 patients with 191 thumbs (average age 61 years (SD 9); 77% female). 158 thumbs received initial HT and 33 CI. For exploratory bivariate LR analyses, baseline and activity-related VA/NRS pain and bMHQ scores were worse for patients pursuing CI. Each multivariable LR model demonstrated higher VA/NRS activity-related pain levels and was still independently associated with increased odds of choosing CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjusting for covariates, baseline activity-related pain was associated with increased odds for choosing CI. Other baseline PROMs/demographics were not associated with initial treatments. Our findings can inform providers, patients, and investigators considering HT and CI, as well as their potential comparative outcomes, for initiating nonoperative thumb CMC OA care.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Initial Nonoperative Treatment Choices for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Drew W Nute, Kavya K Sanghavi, Aviram M Giladi, Kenneth R Means\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated whether baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with initial treatment choice of hand therapy (HT) or corticosteroid injection (CI). We hypothesized patients with worse baseline PROMs would choose CI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We have an ongoing prospective study of patients aged 35-85 with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). We track initial treatments and PROMs including visual analog/numerical rating sub-scales (VA/NRS), brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Global Health (GH) modules. Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), and EuroQol are calculated. We retrospectively identified patients from 2019-2022 who initially chose HT or CI. We performed pairwise comparisons of independent variables between HT and CI groups, then exploratory bivariate logistic regression (LR) analyses for independent variables. We then performed more stringent multivariable LR analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 156 patients with 191 thumbs (average age 61 years (SD 9); 77% female). 158 thumbs received initial HT and 33 CI. For exploratory bivariate LR analyses, baseline and activity-related VA/NRS pain and bMHQ scores were worse for patients pursuing CI. Each multivariable LR model demonstrated higher VA/NRS activity-related pain levels and was still independently associated with increased odds of choosing CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjusting for covariates, baseline activity-related pain was associated with increased odds for choosing CI. Other baseline PROMs/demographics were not associated with initial treatments. Our findings can inform providers, patients, and investigators considering HT and CI, as well as their potential comparative outcomes, for initiating nonoperative thumb CMC OA care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Initial Nonoperative Treatment Choices for Thumb Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis".
Background: We evaluated whether baseline patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are associated with initial treatment choice of hand therapy (HT) or corticosteroid injection (CI). We hypothesized patients with worse baseline PROMs would choose CI.
Methods: We have an ongoing prospective study of patients aged 35-85 with thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) osteoarthritis (OA). We track initial treatments and PROMs including visual analog/numerical rating sub-scales (VA/NRS), brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire (bMHQ), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) and Global Health (GH) modules. Global Mental Health (GMH), Global Physical Health (GPH), and EuroQol are calculated. We retrospectively identified patients from 2019-2022 who initially chose HT or CI. We performed pairwise comparisons of independent variables between HT and CI groups, then exploratory bivariate logistic regression (LR) analyses for independent variables. We then performed more stringent multivariable LR analyses.
Results: We included 156 patients with 191 thumbs (average age 61 years (SD 9); 77% female). 158 thumbs received initial HT and 33 CI. For exploratory bivariate LR analyses, baseline and activity-related VA/NRS pain and bMHQ scores were worse for patients pursuing CI. Each multivariable LR model demonstrated higher VA/NRS activity-related pain levels and was still independently associated with increased odds of choosing CI.
Conclusions: Adjusting for covariates, baseline activity-related pain was associated with increased odds for choosing CI. Other baseline PROMs/demographics were not associated with initial treatments. Our findings can inform providers, patients, and investigators considering HT and CI, as well as their potential comparative outcomes, for initiating nonoperative thumb CMC OA care.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.