居住在食物沙漠地区与乳房重建后并发症的风险增加有关。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Christian X Lava, Varsha Harish, Karen R Li, Alexandra Junn, Nicolas Greige, Ilana G Margulies, Mimi Yue Wu Young, Samer Jabbour, Rajiv P Parikh, Kenneth L Fan
{"title":"居住在食物沙漠地区与乳房重建后并发症的风险增加有关。","authors":"Christian X Lava, Varsha Harish, Karen R Li, Alexandra Junn, Nicolas Greige, Ilana G Margulies, Mimi Yue Wu Young, Samer Jabbour, Rajiv P Parikh, Kenneth L Fan","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food deserts (FD) are areas with high rates of food insecurity due to limited access to healthy food and a high concentration of unhealthy food options. This study aimed to describe the comorbidity burden in patients residing in FDs and assess the impact of residing in a FD on postoperative outcomes following mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy from January 2014 to November 2018 was conducted. Low food access (LFA) was defined as an area where residents lived >1 (urban) or >10 (rural) miles from the nearest supermarket. Primary outcomes included minor and major complications (i.e., return to the operating room).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,553 patients were included. Of whom, 675 (43.5%) resided in LFA areas and 878 (56.5%) in non-low food access (NLFA) areas. Mean BMI was 28.4±8.0 and 28.6±7.3 kg/m2, respectively (p=0.897). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.6±1.3 and 2.3±1.2, respectively (p<0.001). The LFA group experienced more minor complications than the NLFA group (n=190, 28.1% vs. n=187, 21.3%; p=0.002). The LFA group had a higher incidence of reoperation than the NLFA group (n=83, 12.3% vs. n=64, 7.3%; p=0.001). A LFA sub-analysis revealed that low income patients had a higher incidence of reoperation (n=28/158, 17.7% vs. n=55/517, 10.6%; p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest a potential relationship between food access, increased comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Further studies are warranted to better assess the relationship between FDs and post-operative outcomes to better address social determinants of health for breast reconstruction patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Residing in a Food Desert is Associated with an Increased Risk of Complications Following Breast Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"Christian X Lava, Varsha Harish, Karen R Li, Alexandra Junn, Nicolas Greige, Ilana G Margulies, Mimi Yue Wu Young, Samer Jabbour, Rajiv P Parikh, Kenneth L Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Food deserts (FD) are areas with high rates of food insecurity due to limited access to healthy food and a high concentration of unhealthy food options. This study aimed to describe the comorbidity burden in patients residing in FDs and assess the impact of residing in a FD on postoperative outcomes following mastectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy from January 2014 to November 2018 was conducted. Low food access (LFA) was defined as an area where residents lived >1 (urban) or >10 (rural) miles from the nearest supermarket. Primary outcomes included minor and major complications (i.e., return to the operating room).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,553 patients were included. Of whom, 675 (43.5%) resided in LFA areas and 878 (56.5%) in non-low food access (NLFA) areas. Mean BMI was 28.4±8.0 and 28.6±7.3 kg/m2, respectively (p=0.897). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.6±1.3 and 2.3±1.2, respectively (p<0.001). The LFA group experienced more minor complications than the NLFA group (n=190, 28.1% vs. n=187, 21.3%; p=0.002). The LFA group had a higher incidence of reoperation than the NLFA group (n=83, 12.3% vs. n=64, 7.3%; p=0.001). A LFA sub-analysis revealed that low income patients had a higher incidence of reoperation (n=28/158, 17.7% vs. n=55/517, 10.6%; p=0.018).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest a potential relationship between food access, increased comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Further studies are warranted to better assess the relationship between FDs and post-operative outcomes to better address social determinants of health for breast reconstruction patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012479\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012479","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:食物沙漠(FD)是指由于获得健康食品的机会有限和不健康食品选择高度集中而粮食不安全发生率高的地区。本研究旨在描述居住在FD的患者的合并症负担,并评估居住在FD对乳房切除术后预后的影响。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月至2018年11月接受乳房切除术的患者。低食物获取(LFA)被定义为居民居住在距离最近的超市100英里(城市)或10英里(农村)的地区。主要结局包括轻微和严重并发症(即返回手术室)。结果:共纳入1553例患者。其中,675人(43.5%)居住在低粮食获取区,878人(56.5%)居住在非低粮食获取区。平均BMI分别为28.4±8.0和28.6±7.3 kg/m2 (p=0.897)。平均Charlson合并症指数分别为2.6±1.3和2.3±1.2。结论:研究结果提示食物获取、合并症增加和术后并发症之间存在潜在的关系。有必要进一步研究以更好地评估fd与术后结果之间的关系,以更好地解决乳房重建患者健康的社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Residing in a Food Desert is Associated with an Increased Risk of Complications Following Breast Reconstruction.

Background: Food deserts (FD) are areas with high rates of food insecurity due to limited access to healthy food and a high concentration of unhealthy food options. This study aimed to describe the comorbidity burden in patients residing in FDs and assess the impact of residing in a FD on postoperative outcomes following mastectomy.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing mastectomy from January 2014 to November 2018 was conducted. Low food access (LFA) was defined as an area where residents lived >1 (urban) or >10 (rural) miles from the nearest supermarket. Primary outcomes included minor and major complications (i.e., return to the operating room).

Results: A total of 1,553 patients were included. Of whom, 675 (43.5%) resided in LFA areas and 878 (56.5%) in non-low food access (NLFA) areas. Mean BMI was 28.4±8.0 and 28.6±7.3 kg/m2, respectively (p=0.897). Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 2.6±1.3 and 2.3±1.2, respectively (p<0.001). The LFA group experienced more minor complications than the NLFA group (n=190, 28.1% vs. n=187, 21.3%; p=0.002). The LFA group had a higher incidence of reoperation than the NLFA group (n=83, 12.3% vs. n=64, 7.3%; p=0.001). A LFA sub-analysis revealed that low income patients had a higher incidence of reoperation (n=28/158, 17.7% vs. n=55/517, 10.6%; p=0.018).

Conclusion: The findings suggest a potential relationship between food access, increased comorbidities, and postoperative complications. Further studies are warranted to better assess the relationship between FDs and post-operative outcomes to better address social determinants of health for breast reconstruction patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信