个体心理教育干预对脑卒中患者照护者的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Hesham Kelani, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Ahmed Naeem, Hazem Mohamed Salamah, Ali Ismail, Youmna Atef Younes, Ismail A Ibrahim, Ahmed Fikry Mohamed, Abdelrahman Mady, Ahmed Abd Elazim, Mohammad El-Ghanem, Volodymyr Vulkanov, Diana Greene-Chandos, May Noor, David P Lerner, Arthur D Kay, Lisa R Merlin, Priyank Khandelwal
{"title":"个体心理教育干预对脑卒中患者照护者的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Hesham Kelani, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Ahmed Naeem, Hazem Mohamed Salamah, Ali Ismail, Youmna Atef Younes, Ismail A Ibrahim, Ahmed Fikry Mohamed, Abdelrahman Mady, Ahmed Abd Elazim, Mohammad El-Ghanem, Volodymyr Vulkanov, Diana Greene-Chandos, May Noor, David P Lerner, Arthur D Kay, Lisa R Merlin, Priyank Khandelwal","doi":"10.1007/s10880-025-10097-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke is a major cause of disability, and patients who suffer strokes have limited mobility and functional tasks, necessitating daily reliance on caregivers. However, caregivers of stroke patients often experience depression and anxiety, negatively impacting their mental health and reducing their quality of life. Psychoeducational interventions may be a solution to support the well-being of stroke caregivers. This study is performed to assess the overall effectiveness of individual psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of stroke patients. A thorough search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed for published studies in English up to June 2023. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions on quality of life, depression, or care burden among stroke caregivers compared to usual care were included. A total of 18 clinical trials, 16 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and two non-RCTs, with a total of 2007 patients, were included. The study's pooled results revealed a significant increase in the quality of life in the group receiving psychoeducational interventions compared to the comparison group (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p value = 0.002), while no significant difference was found in terms of depression (SMD =  - 0.05, 95% CI  - 0.23 to 0.14, p value = 0.62) or caregiver burden (SMD =  - 0.61, 95% CI  - 1.65 to 0.44, p value = 0.25). Psychoeducation programs should be considered as a supportive intervention to improve quality of life in caregivers; however, their impact on depression and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. However, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15494,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Individual Psychoeducational Interventions for Caregivers of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Hesham Kelani, Hossam Tharwat Ali, Ahmed Naeem, Hazem Mohamed Salamah, Ali Ismail, Youmna Atef Younes, Ismail A Ibrahim, Ahmed Fikry Mohamed, Abdelrahman Mady, Ahmed Abd Elazim, Mohammad El-Ghanem, Volodymyr Vulkanov, Diana Greene-Chandos, May Noor, David P Lerner, Arthur D Kay, Lisa R Merlin, Priyank Khandelwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10880-025-10097-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Stroke is a major cause of disability, and patients who suffer strokes have limited mobility and functional tasks, necessitating daily reliance on caregivers. However, caregivers of stroke patients often experience depression and anxiety, negatively impacting their mental health and reducing their quality of life. Psychoeducational interventions may be a solution to support the well-being of stroke caregivers. This study is performed to assess the overall effectiveness of individual psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of stroke patients. A thorough search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed for published studies in English up to June 2023. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions on quality of life, depression, or care burden among stroke caregivers compared to usual care were included. A total of 18 clinical trials, 16 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and two non-RCTs, with a total of 2007 patients, were included. The study's pooled results revealed a significant increase in the quality of life in the group receiving psychoeducational interventions compared to the comparison group (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p value = 0.002), while no significant difference was found in terms of depression (SMD =  - 0.05, 95% CI  - 0.23 to 0.14, p value = 0.62) or caregiver burden (SMD =  - 0.61, 95% CI  - 1.65 to 0.44, p value = 0.25). Psychoeducation programs should be considered as a supportive intervention to improve quality of life in caregivers; however, their impact on depression and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. However, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10097-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-025-10097-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中风是致残的主要原因,中风患者的行动能力和功能性任务有限,每天都需要依靠护理人员。然而,中风患者的护理人员经常经历抑郁和焦虑,对他们的心理健康产生负面影响,降低他们的生活质量。心理教育干预可能是一个解决方案,以支持中风照顾者的福祉。本研究旨在评估个体心理教育干预对脑卒中患者照护者的整体效果。对Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库进行了全面搜索,以获取截至2023年6月已发表的英文研究。与常规护理相比,评估心理教育干预对卒中护理人员的生活质量、抑郁或护理负担的疗效的临床试验被纳入研究。共纳入18项临床试验、16项随机临床试验(rct)和2项非随机临床试验(rct),共计2007例患者。该研究的汇总结果显示,与对照组相比,接受心理教育干预的组的生活质量显著提高(SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p值= 0.002),而在抑郁(SMD = - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.23 - 0.14, p值= 0.62)或照顾者负担(SMD = - 0.61, 95% CI - 1.65 - 0.44, p值= 0.25)方面没有发现显著差异。心理教育计划应被视为一种支持性干预措施,以提高照顾者的生活质量;然而,它们对抑郁症和照顾者负担的影响仍不确定。然而,还需要更大样本量的进一步研究来证实这一结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Individual Psychoeducational Interventions for Caregivers of Stroke Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Stroke is a major cause of disability, and patients who suffer strokes have limited mobility and functional tasks, necessitating daily reliance on caregivers. However, caregivers of stroke patients often experience depression and anxiety, negatively impacting their mental health and reducing their quality of life. Psychoeducational interventions may be a solution to support the well-being of stroke caregivers. This study is performed to assess the overall effectiveness of individual psychoeducational interventions for caregivers of stroke patients. A thorough search of Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases was performed for published studies in English up to June 2023. Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of psychoeducational interventions on quality of life, depression, or care burden among stroke caregivers compared to usual care were included. A total of 18 clinical trials, 16 randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and two non-RCTs, with a total of 2007 patients, were included. The study's pooled results revealed a significant increase in the quality of life in the group receiving psychoeducational interventions compared to the comparison group (SMD = 0.34, 95% CI 0.13-0.55, p value = 0.002), while no significant difference was found in terms of depression (SMD =  - 0.05, 95% CI  - 0.23 to 0.14, p value = 0.62) or caregiver burden (SMD =  - 0.61, 95% CI  - 1.65 to 0.44, p value = 0.25). Psychoeducation programs should be considered as a supportive intervention to improve quality of life in caregivers; however, their impact on depression and caregiver burden remains inconclusive. However, further studies with a larger sample size are needed to confirm the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers related to all areas of the science and practice of psychologists in medical settings. Manuscripts are chosen that have a broad appeal across psychology as well as other health care disciplines, reflecting varying backgrounds, interests, and specializations. The journal publishes original research, treatment outcome trials, meta-analyses, literature reviews, conceptual papers, brief scientific reports, and scholarly case studies. Papers accepted address clinical matters in medical settings; integrated care; health disparities; education and training of the future psychology workforce; interdisciplinary collaboration, training, and professionalism; licensing, credentialing, and privileging in hospital practice; research and practice ethics; professional development of psychologists in academic health centers; professional practice matters in medical settings; and cultural, economic, political, regulatory, and systems factors in health care. In summary, the journal provides a forum for papers predicted to have significant theoretical or practical importance for the application of psychology in medical settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信