辅助化疗治疗IA期肺腺癌伴肺间隙扩散的疗效:一项多中心真实世界研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Hanbo Pan, Weiyang Huang, Wanlin Yang, Ling Li, Zhen Ge, Weicheng Kong, Hang Chen, Yu Tian, Wanyu Li, Junwei Ning, Liang Fang, Zhongjie Chen, Guomo Ruan, Zhizhuo Dai, Min Zheng, Ming Zhang, Hui Wang, Xiaomin Niu, Jia Huang, Hui Yin, Chengwei Zhou, Guodong Xu, Qingquan Luo
{"title":"辅助化疗治疗IA期肺腺癌伴肺间隙扩散的疗效:一项多中心真实世界研究","authors":"Hanbo Pan, Weiyang Huang, Wanlin Yang, Ling Li, Zhen Ge, Weicheng Kong, Hang Chen, Yu Tian, Wanyu Li, Junwei Ning, Liang Fang, Zhongjie Chen, Guomo Ruan, Zhizhuo Dai, Min Zheng, Ming Zhang, Hui Wang, Xiaomin Niu, Jia Huang, Hui Yin, Chengwei Zhou, Guodong Xu, Qingquan Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ACT in stage IA STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD patients and to identify subpopulations that might derive clinically significant benefits from ACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive pathological stage IA (T1a-cN0M0) STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD patients who underwent surgery, with or without ACT, between 2012 and 2020 across 6 high-volume centers were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Clinically significant survival benefits were predefined as a hazard ratio (HR) < 0.70, or HR < 0.75 with an absolute 5-year survival improvement > 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3026 eligible cases, 2619 patients (873 ACT and 1746 no ACT) were matched by PSM, achieving well-balanced clinicopathological characteristics. Over a median follow-up of 6.88 years, ACT did not confer clinically significant improvements in overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.795, P = .010) in the overall cohort. Cox regression analyses identified age, histology subtype, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), resection extent, and pathological stage as independent prognostic factors. Interaction analyses further revealed that histology subtype, LVI, and resection extent, but not age or pathological stage, modified ACT's effect on survival. Exploratory stratified analyses demonstrated that ACT may be associated with clinically significant survival benefits among patients undergoing sub-lobectomy, those with LVI<sup>+</sup> tumors, and those with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ACT demonstrated limited clinical survival benefit for the overall stage IA STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD population, it may be necessary for selected high-risk subgroups, specifically those undergoing sub-lobectomy, with LVI<sup>+</sup> tumors, or with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.</p>","PeriodicalId":10490,"journal":{"name":"Clinical lung cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces: A Multi-Center Real-World Study.\",\"authors\":\"Hanbo Pan, Weiyang Huang, Wanlin Yang, Ling Li, Zhen Ge, Weicheng Kong, Hang Chen, Yu Tian, Wanyu Li, Junwei Ning, Liang Fang, Zhongjie Chen, Guomo Ruan, Zhizhuo Dai, Min Zheng, Ming Zhang, Hui Wang, Xiaomin Niu, Jia Huang, Hui Yin, Chengwei Zhou, Guodong Xu, Qingquan Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cllc.2025.09.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ACT in stage IA STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD patients and to identify subpopulations that might derive clinically significant benefits from ACT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive pathological stage IA (T1a-cN0M0) STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD patients who underwent surgery, with or without ACT, between 2012 and 2020 across 6 high-volume centers were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Clinically significant survival benefits were predefined as a hazard ratio (HR) < 0.70, or HR < 0.75 with an absolute 5-year survival improvement > 5%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3026 eligible cases, 2619 patients (873 ACT and 1746 no ACT) were matched by PSM, achieving well-balanced clinicopathological characteristics. Over a median follow-up of 6.88 years, ACT did not confer clinically significant improvements in overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.795, P = .010) in the overall cohort. Cox regression analyses identified age, histology subtype, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), resection extent, and pathological stage as independent prognostic factors. Interaction analyses further revealed that histology subtype, LVI, and resection extent, but not age or pathological stage, modified ACT's effect on survival. Exploratory stratified analyses demonstrated that ACT may be associated with clinically significant survival benefits among patients undergoing sub-lobectomy, those with LVI<sup>+</sup> tumors, and those with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although ACT demonstrated limited clinical survival benefit for the overall stage IA STAS<sup>+</sup> LUAD population, it may be necessary for selected high-risk subgroups, specifically those undergoing sub-lobectomy, with LVI<sup>+</sup> tumors, or with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical lung cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.09.004\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical lung cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2025.09.004","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:辅助化疗(ACT)对IA期肺腺癌(LUAD)伴肺间隙扩散(STAS)的作用尚不明确。本研究旨在评估ACT在IA期STAS+ LUAD患者中的疗效,并确定可能从ACT中获得临床显著益处的亚群。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2020年6个大容量中心的连续病理期IA (T1a-cN0M0) STAS+ LUAD患者,无论是否接受ACT手术。采用倾向分数匹配(PSM)来减少选择偏差。主要终点是总生存期。临床显著生存获益被预先定义为风险比(HR) < 0.70,或HR < 0.75,绝对5年生存改善> %。结果:在3026例符合条件的患者中,2619例患者(873例ACT, 1746例未ACT)经PSM匹配,临床病理特征平衡良好。在中位6.88年的随访中,ACT在整个队列中没有给总体生存带来临床显著的改善(风险比= 0.795,P = 0.010)。Cox回归分析确定年龄、组织学亚型、淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)、切除程度和病理分期为独立的预后因素。相互作用分析进一步显示,组织学亚型、LVI和切除程度,而不是年龄或病理分期,改变了ACT对生存的影响。探索性分层分析表明,在接受亚肺叶切除术、LVI+肿瘤和实体/微乳头状病变为主的组织学患者中,ACT可能与临床显著的生存益处相关。结论:尽管ACT对整个IA期STAS+ LUAD人群的临床生存益处有限,但对于特定的高风险亚组,特别是接受亚肺叶切除术、LVI+肿瘤或实体/微乳头状病变为主的患者,可能有必要进行ACT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma with Tumor Spread Through Air Spaces: A Multi-Center Real-World Study.

Background: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for stage IA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with tumor spread through air spaces (STAS) remains inconclusive. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ACT in stage IA STAS+ LUAD patients and to identify subpopulations that might derive clinically significant benefits from ACT.

Methods: Consecutive pathological stage IA (T1a-cN0M0) STAS+ LUAD patients who underwent surgery, with or without ACT, between 2012 and 2020 across 6 high-volume centers were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to minimize selection bias. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Clinically significant survival benefits were predefined as a hazard ratio (HR) < 0.70, or HR < 0.75 with an absolute 5-year survival improvement > 5%.

Results: Among 3026 eligible cases, 2619 patients (873 ACT and 1746 no ACT) were matched by PSM, achieving well-balanced clinicopathological characteristics. Over a median follow-up of 6.88 years, ACT did not confer clinically significant improvements in overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.795, P = .010) in the overall cohort. Cox regression analyses identified age, histology subtype, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), resection extent, and pathological stage as independent prognostic factors. Interaction analyses further revealed that histology subtype, LVI, and resection extent, but not age or pathological stage, modified ACT's effect on survival. Exploratory stratified analyses demonstrated that ACT may be associated with clinically significant survival benefits among patients undergoing sub-lobectomy, those with LVI+ tumors, and those with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.

Conclusions: Although ACT demonstrated limited clinical survival benefit for the overall stage IA STAS+ LUAD population, it may be necessary for selected high-risk subgroups, specifically those undergoing sub-lobectomy, with LVI+ tumors, or with solid/micropapillary-predominant histology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical lung cancer
Clinical lung cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.80%
发文量
159
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Lung Cancer is a peer-reviewed bimonthly journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research of lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of lung cancer. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to lung cancer. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信