Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Adrian Sayers, Michael R Whitehouse
{"title":"英国单日髋关节和膝关节置换术:一项基于人群的队列研究,使用相关的国家联合登记和医院事件统计数据。","authors":"Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Adrian Sayers, Michael R Whitehouse","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04280-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to rising demand, disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, and the need for improved cost-effectiveness, the way hip and knee replacements are being delivered is rapidly changing. Increasingly, they are being performed as day case procedures without an overnight stay in hospital. This study assessed the safety of this for a national cohort of NHS-funded procedures in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Joint Registry, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Civil Registration of Deaths databases were linked to identify patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR) and total or unicompartmental knee replacement (TKR/UKR) in England between 2010 and 2022. Outcomes including 30-day readmissions, 90-day serious adverse events, and 1-year reoperations were compared between day case and one-day stay inpatients using adjusted flexible parametric survival models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 7485 day case and 60,747 one-day stay inpatient procedures. Day case surgery was associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission for THR (adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.53) and TKR (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.48). A learning curve was observed where the first 6-day case THRs and the first 4-day case TKRs per unit carried significantly higher readmission risk. There were no differences in 90-day serious adverse events. However, day case TKR was associated with an increased risk of reoperation within 1 year (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.96; NNTH 84), most commonly manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). No significant differences were found for UKR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Day case UKR appears safe. Day case THR is generally safe, and although there is a higher risk of readmission in the first six procedures at each unit, other safety outcomes are not different. However, day case TKR carries an increased risk of reoperation, mainly for MUA which is typically performed for postoperative stiffness.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"564"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day case hip and knee replacement in England: a population-based cohort study using linked National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics data.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan M R French, Kevin Deere, Adrian Sayers, Michael R Whitehouse\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04280-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In response to rising demand, disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, and the need for improved cost-effectiveness, the way hip and knee replacements are being delivered is rapidly changing. Increasingly, they are being performed as day case procedures without an overnight stay in hospital. This study assessed the safety of this for a national cohort of NHS-funded procedures in England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the National Joint Registry, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Civil Registration of Deaths databases were linked to identify patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR) and total or unicompartmental knee replacement (TKR/UKR) in England between 2010 and 2022. Outcomes including 30-day readmissions, 90-day serious adverse events, and 1-year reoperations were compared between day case and one-day stay inpatients using adjusted flexible parametric survival models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 7485 day case and 60,747 one-day stay inpatient procedures. Day case surgery was associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission for THR (adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.53) and TKR (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.48). A learning curve was observed where the first 6-day case THRs and the first 4-day case TKRs per unit carried significantly higher readmission risk. There were no differences in 90-day serious adverse events. However, day case TKR was associated with an increased risk of reoperation within 1 year (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.96; NNTH 84), most commonly manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). No significant differences were found for UKR.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Day case UKR appears safe. Day case THR is generally safe, and although there is a higher risk of readmission in the first six procedures at each unit, other safety outcomes are not different. However, day case TKR carries an increased risk of reoperation, mainly for MUA which is typically performed for postoperative stiffness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"564\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04280-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04280-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:为了应对不断增长的需求、2019冠状病毒病大流行造成的破坏以及提高成本效益的需要,髋关节和膝关节置换术的交付方式正在迅速发生变化。这些手术越来越多地作为日间病例进行,无需在医院过夜。这项研究评估了在英国nhs资助的国家队列手术的安全性。方法:来自国家联合登记处、医院事件统计和民事死亡登记数据库的数据与2010年至2022年间在英国接受全髋关节置换术(THR)和全或单室膝关节置换术(TKR/UKR)的患者相关联。结果包括30天再入院、90天严重不良事件和1年再手术,采用调整后的灵活参数生存模型对日间病例和1天住院患者进行比较。结果:本研究纳入7485天病例和60747天住院病例。日间手术与THR(调整相对风险(RR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.07至1.53)和TKR (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10至1.48)的30天再入院风险较高相关。观察到一个学习曲线,第一个6天的病例thr和第一个4天的病例tkr每单位具有显著更高的再入院风险。90天严重不良事件发生率无差异。然而,日间病例TKR与1年内再手术风险增加相关(RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15至1.96;NNTH 84),最常见的是麻醉下操作(MUA)。未发现UKR有显著差异。结论:日病例UKR是安全的。日间病例THR通常是安全的,尽管在每个单元的前六个程序中再入院的风险较高,但其他安全结果并没有不同。然而,日间TKR增加了再手术的风险,主要是由于术后僵硬而进行的MUA。
Day case hip and knee replacement in England: a population-based cohort study using linked National Joint Registry and Hospital Episode Statistics data.
Background: In response to rising demand, disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic, and the need for improved cost-effectiveness, the way hip and knee replacements are being delivered is rapidly changing. Increasingly, they are being performed as day case procedures without an overnight stay in hospital. This study assessed the safety of this for a national cohort of NHS-funded procedures in England.
Methods: Data from the National Joint Registry, Hospital Episode Statistics, and Civil Registration of Deaths databases were linked to identify patients who underwent total hip replacement (THR) and total or unicompartmental knee replacement (TKR/UKR) in England between 2010 and 2022. Outcomes including 30-day readmissions, 90-day serious adverse events, and 1-year reoperations were compared between day case and one-day stay inpatients using adjusted flexible parametric survival models.
Results: The study included 7485 day case and 60,747 one-day stay inpatient procedures. Day case surgery was associated with a higher risk of 30-day readmission for THR (adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.53) and TKR (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.48). A learning curve was observed where the first 6-day case THRs and the first 4-day case TKRs per unit carried significantly higher readmission risk. There were no differences in 90-day serious adverse events. However, day case TKR was associated with an increased risk of reoperation within 1 year (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.96; NNTH 84), most commonly manipulation under anaesthesia (MUA). No significant differences were found for UKR.
Conclusions: Day case UKR appears safe. Day case THR is generally safe, and although there is a higher risk of readmission in the first six procedures at each unit, other safety outcomes are not different. However, day case TKR carries an increased risk of reoperation, mainly for MUA which is typically performed for postoperative stiffness.
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.