{"title":"乌干达不良分娩相关结果的患病率和风险:一项嵌套病例对照的横断面研究。","authors":"Phillip Wanduru, Manuela Straneo, Samantha Sadoo, Cally J Tann, Angelina Mwesige Kakooza, Rolland Mutumba, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Peter Waiswa, Claudia Hanson","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional with a nested case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 min, cord blood lactate ≥5.5 mmol/L and Thompson score ≥5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"15 10","pages":"e099256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and risk of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes in Uganda: a cross-sectional study with nested case-control.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Wanduru, Manuela Straneo, Samantha Sadoo, Cally J Tann, Angelina Mwesige Kakooza, Rolland Mutumba, Kristi Sidney Annerstedt, Peter Waiswa, Claudia Hanson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional with a nested case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 min, cord blood lactate ≥5.5 mmol/L and Thompson score ≥5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"e099256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099256\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
产中相关并发症是围产期不良结局的主要原因,包括死产、新生儿死亡和产中相关新生儿脑病(IP-NE)。我们评估了不良产内相关结局的发生率,评估了IP-NE与产科和胎儿危险因素之间的关联,并检查了急诊转诊和急诊剖宫产(CS)是否通过相互作用改变了这种关联。设计:横断面嵌套病例对照研究。环境:乌干达东部农村的两家医院。人口:2022年6月至12月期间生下活产或死产婴儿的妇女,体重达2000克。方法:我们使用前瞻性收集的围产期电子登记数据来评估围产期不良结局的发生率。采用Logistic回归与回归后边缘分析相互作用来确定高血压疾病、产前出血、延长/难产和出生体重危险组中IP-NE与急诊转诊和急诊CS之间的关系。主要结局指标:不良围产期结局为死产、24小时新生儿死亡和IP-NE(定义为Apgar评分)结果:在6550例分娩中,10.2%发生不良围产期结局:死产3.8%,新生儿死亡0.6%,IP-NE 5.7%。与母亲无并发症的新生儿相比,母亲有产前出血(31.3%)或分娩时间延长/难产(27.2%)的新生儿不良结局更高。急诊转诊和CS没有改变IP-NE与产科风险之间的关系,除了长时间/难产。没有紧急CS, IP-NE的预测概率为0.73 (95% CI 0.51 ~ 0.95);CS组则降至0.45 (95% CI 0.39 ~ 0.50)。结论:有产科并发症母亲所生的新生儿健康生存率较低。除了难产或分娩时间延长外,急诊转诊和CS并没有改变产科并发症妇女发生IP-NE的风险,这突出表明,这些干预措施可能没有足够的及时性和质量,和/或需要在转诊和CS之外采取其他更有针对性的策略来解决IP-NE。
Prevalence and risk of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes in Uganda: a cross-sectional study with nested case-control.
Introduction: Intrapartum-related complications are a leading cause of adverse perinatal outcomes, including stillbirths, neonatal deaths and intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy (IP-NE). We assessed the prevalence of adverse intrapartum-related outcomes, evaluated the association between IP-NE and obstetric and fetal risk factors, and examined whether emergency referral and emergency caesarean section (CS) modified this association through interaction effects.
Design: Cross-sectional with a nested case-control study.
Setting: Two hospitals in rural Eastern Uganda.
Population: Women giving birth to a live or stillborn baby weighing >2000 g between June and December 2022.
Methods: We used prospectively collected perinatal e-registry data to assess the prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Logistic regression with interaction with postregression margins analysis was used to determine the association between IP-NE and emergency referral and emergency CS across risk groups of hypertensive disorders, antepartum haemorrhage, prolonged/obstructed labour and birth weight.
Main outcome measures: Adverse perinatal outcomes were stillbirths, 24-hour neonatal deaths and IP-NE (defined as Apgar score <7 at 5 min, cord blood lactate ≥5.5 mmol/L and Thompson score ≥5).
Results: Of 6550 births, 10.2% had an adverse perinatal outcome: 3.8% stillbirths, 0.6% neonatal deaths and 5.7% IP-NE. Adverse outcomes were higher among neonates whose mothers had antepartum haemorrhage (31.3%) or prolonged/obstructed labour (27.2%) compared with those whose mothers had no complications. Emergency referral and CS did not change the association between IP-NE and obstetric risk, except in prolonged/obstructed labour. Without emergency CS, the predicted probability of IP-NE was 0.73 (95% CI 0.51 to 0.95); with CS, it decreased to 0.45 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.50).
Conclusions: Neonates born to mothers with obstetric complications had low healthy survival rates. Emergency referral and CS did not alter the risks of IP-NE in women with obstetric complications except for obstructed or prolonged labour, highlighting that these interventions may not be implemented with sufficient timeliness or quality, and/or that additional, more targeted strategies beyond referral and CS are needed to address IP-NE.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.