直觉到洞察力:一个基于变化的框架来测试关于动物如何解决问题的假设。

IF 3 2区 生物学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Biology Letters Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2025.0293
Madison A Rittinger, Rafael Lucas Rodríguez
{"title":"直觉到洞察力:一个基于变化的框架来测试关于动物如何解决问题的假设。","authors":"Madison A Rittinger, Rafael Lucas Rodríguez","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2025.0293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Problem-solving is an integral part of most animals' lives. There are generally four types of solutions animals may use: innate, learned previously, learned de novo or insightful. Identifying the types of solutions animals use can be difficult, especially with the trend of having increasingly difficult requirements to test hypotheses in this field. These requirements often amount to proving a negative, which may be impossible. Therefore, here we develop a novel framework for testing hypotheses that can help distinguish the types of solutions animals may use that does not require proving a negative. This framework is based on distinct patterns of <i>qualitative</i> and <i>quantitative</i> variation <i>between</i> and <i>within</i> individuals. Because this framework does not require knowledge of animal's prior history nor that the problem be evolutionarily novel, it can be used with a variety of animals, experimental designs and settings. We suggest this framework could serve as a valuable tool in expanding how we study animal problem-solving, especially in the types of animals studied. Studying problem-solving in a wide variety of animals would allow us to form a better understanding of the problem-solving abilities different brain sizes and structures confer and, more broadly, the evolution of those abilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"21 10","pages":"20250293"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520766/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instinct to insight: a variation-based framework to test hypotheses about how animals solve problems.\",\"authors\":\"Madison A Rittinger, Rafael Lucas Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1098/rsbl.2025.0293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Problem-solving is an integral part of most animals' lives. There are generally four types of solutions animals may use: innate, learned previously, learned de novo or insightful. Identifying the types of solutions animals use can be difficult, especially with the trend of having increasingly difficult requirements to test hypotheses in this field. These requirements often amount to proving a negative, which may be impossible. Therefore, here we develop a novel framework for testing hypotheses that can help distinguish the types of solutions animals may use that does not require proving a negative. This framework is based on distinct patterns of <i>qualitative</i> and <i>quantitative</i> variation <i>between</i> and <i>within</i> individuals. Because this framework does not require knowledge of animal's prior history nor that the problem be evolutionarily novel, it can be used with a variety of animals, experimental designs and settings. We suggest this framework could serve as a valuable tool in expanding how we study animal problem-solving, especially in the types of animals studied. Studying problem-solving in a wide variety of animals would allow us to form a better understanding of the problem-solving abilities different brain sizes and structures confer and, more broadly, the evolution of those abilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology Letters\",\"volume\":\"21 10\",\"pages\":\"20250293\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12520766/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0293\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2025.0293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

解决问题是大多数动物生活中不可或缺的一部分。动物通常会使用四种类型的解决方案:天生的、以前学过的、从头学过的或有洞察力的。确定动物使用的解决方案的类型可能很困难,特别是在该领域测试假设的要求越来越困难的趋势下。这些要求往往等于证明是否定的,这可能是不可能的。因此,在这里,我们开发了一个新的框架来测试假设,可以帮助区分动物可能使用的不需要证明否定的解决方案类型。这一框架是基于个人之间和个人内部在质量和数量上的不同变化模式。因为这个框架不需要了解动物的先前历史,也不需要问题在进化上是新颖的,所以它可以用于各种动物,实验设计和设置。我们认为这个框架可以作为一个有价值的工具来扩展我们如何研究动物问题的解决方式,特别是在研究的动物类型中。研究各种各样的动物解决问题的能力将使我们更好地理解不同的大脑大小和结构赋予的解决问题的能力,更广泛地说,这些能力的进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Instinct to insight: a variation-based framework to test hypotheses about how animals solve problems.

Problem-solving is an integral part of most animals' lives. There are generally four types of solutions animals may use: innate, learned previously, learned de novo or insightful. Identifying the types of solutions animals use can be difficult, especially with the trend of having increasingly difficult requirements to test hypotheses in this field. These requirements often amount to proving a negative, which may be impossible. Therefore, here we develop a novel framework for testing hypotheses that can help distinguish the types of solutions animals may use that does not require proving a negative. This framework is based on distinct patterns of qualitative and quantitative variation between and within individuals. Because this framework does not require knowledge of animal's prior history nor that the problem be evolutionarily novel, it can be used with a variety of animals, experimental designs and settings. We suggest this framework could serve as a valuable tool in expanding how we study animal problem-solving, especially in the types of animals studied. Studying problem-solving in a wide variety of animals would allow us to form a better understanding of the problem-solving abilities different brain sizes and structures confer and, more broadly, the evolution of those abilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology Letters
Biology Letters 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
164
审稿时长
1.0 months
期刊介绍: Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信