在紧急情况和灾害中成功管理保健活动的主要挑战和障碍:一项定性传统内容分析研究的结果。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hojjat Farahmandnia, Majid Sartipi, Ali Nasiri, Ali Khosravizad, Asiye Aminafshar
{"title":"在紧急情况和灾害中成功管理保健活动的主要挑战和障碍:一项定性传统内容分析研究的结果。","authors":"Hojjat Farahmandnia, Majid Sartipi, Ali Nasiri, Ali Khosravizad, Asiye Aminafshar","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01360-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enhancing health system preparedness requires the design, implementation, and evaluation of disaster exercises. Conducting these exercises improves preparedness planning and promotes staff awareness and capabilities in responding to emergencies and disasters. Given the existing challenges in designing and executing disaster exercises within the health sector, this study aims to identify the main challenges and barriers to the successful management of health sector disaster exercises.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a conventional qualitative content analysis. Data were collected through purposive sampling through in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews with 23 managers from various health sectors. Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis was employed to analyze the data, and Lincoln and Guba's recommendations were utilized to ensure the trustworthiness of the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 170 challenges (initial codes), organized into one them, five main categories and 15 subcategories, emerged after several rounds of data analysis and summarization, considering both similarities and differences. These main categories included \"Organizational management\", \"structural and administrative system\", \"Ineffective policymaking\", \"Cultural sensitivity and social participation\", and \"organizing exercise steps\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the obstacles and challenges in implementing discussion-based and operations-based exercises in emergencies and disasters derived from the experiences of exercise implementers in the health system can help health planners and managers proactively address these obstacles and by considering these challenges and striving to reduce them before designing an exercise they can maintain and improve preparedness of their community's healthcare system through the implementation of successful and effective exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"205"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Major challenges and barriers for successful management of health exercises in emergencies and disasters: findings from a qualitative conventional content analysis study.\",\"authors\":\"Hojjat Farahmandnia, Majid Sartipi, Ali Nasiri, Ali Khosravizad, Asiye Aminafshar\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01360-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Enhancing health system preparedness requires the design, implementation, and evaluation of disaster exercises. Conducting these exercises improves preparedness planning and promotes staff awareness and capabilities in responding to emergencies and disasters. Given the existing challenges in designing and executing disaster exercises within the health sector, this study aims to identify the main challenges and barriers to the successful management of health sector disaster exercises.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study was a conventional qualitative content analysis. Data were collected through purposive sampling through in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews with 23 managers from various health sectors. Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis was employed to analyze the data, and Lincoln and Guba's recommendations were utilized to ensure the trustworthiness of the data.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>A total of 170 challenges (initial codes), organized into one them, five main categories and 15 subcategories, emerged after several rounds of data analysis and summarization, considering both similarities and differences. These main categories included \\\"Organizational management\\\", \\\"structural and administrative system\\\", \\\"Ineffective policymaking\\\", \\\"Cultural sensitivity and social participation\\\", and \\\"organizing exercise steps\\\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the obstacles and challenges in implementing discussion-based and operations-based exercises in emergencies and disasters derived from the experiences of exercise implementers in the health system can help health planners and managers proactively address these obstacles and by considering these challenges and striving to reduce them before designing an exercise they can maintain and improve preparedness of their community's healthcare system through the implementation of successful and effective exercises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"205\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01360-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01360-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:加强卫生系统准备需要设计、实施和评估灾害演习。进行这些演习可以改进备灾规划,提高工作人员对紧急情况和灾害的认识和能力。鉴于在卫生部门设计和执行灾害演习方面存在的挑战,本研究旨在确定成功管理卫生部门灾害演习的主要挑战和障碍。方法:采用常规定性含量分析方法。通过对来自不同卫生部门的23名管理人员进行深入、半结构化的个人访谈,通过有目的的抽样收集数据。数据分析采用Graneheim and Lundman的传统内容分析,并采用Lincoln and Guba的建议来保证数据的可信度。结果:经过多轮数据分析和汇总,综合考虑异同,共产生170个挑战(初始代码),分为1个挑战、5个主要类别和15个小类别。这些主要类别包括“组织管理”、“结构和行政制度”、“决策无效”、“文化敏感性和社会参与”和“组织实践步骤”。结论:了解在突发事件和灾害中实施基于讨论和基于操作的演习的障碍和挑战,可以帮助卫生计划者和管理者主动解决这些障碍,通过考虑这些挑战,并在设计演习之前努力减少这些挑战,他们可以通过成功的实施来保持和提高社区卫生保健系统的准备以及有效的锻炼。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Major challenges and barriers for successful management of health exercises in emergencies and disasters: findings from a qualitative conventional content analysis study.

Major challenges and barriers for successful management of health exercises in emergencies and disasters: findings from a qualitative conventional content analysis study.

Major challenges and barriers for successful management of health exercises in emergencies and disasters: findings from a qualitative conventional content analysis study.

Major challenges and barriers for successful management of health exercises in emergencies and disasters: findings from a qualitative conventional content analysis study.

Introduction: Enhancing health system preparedness requires the design, implementation, and evaluation of disaster exercises. Conducting these exercises improves preparedness planning and promotes staff awareness and capabilities in responding to emergencies and disasters. Given the existing challenges in designing and executing disaster exercises within the health sector, this study aims to identify the main challenges and barriers to the successful management of health sector disaster exercises.

Method: This study was a conventional qualitative content analysis. Data were collected through purposive sampling through in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews with 23 managers from various health sectors. Graneheim and Lundman's conventional content analysis was employed to analyze the data, and Lincoln and Guba's recommendations were utilized to ensure the trustworthiness of the data.

Result: A total of 170 challenges (initial codes), organized into one them, five main categories and 15 subcategories, emerged after several rounds of data analysis and summarization, considering both similarities and differences. These main categories included "Organizational management", "structural and administrative system", "Ineffective policymaking", "Cultural sensitivity and social participation", and "organizing exercise steps".

Conclusion: Understanding the obstacles and challenges in implementing discussion-based and operations-based exercises in emergencies and disasters derived from the experiences of exercise implementers in the health system can help health planners and managers proactively address these obstacles and by considering these challenges and striving to reduce them before designing an exercise they can maintain and improve preparedness of their community's healthcare system through the implementation of successful and effective exercises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信