{"title":"靶向xbb .1.5组粒新冠病毒mRNA疫苗DS-5670d的免疫原性和安全性:一项3期随机、主动对照研究","authors":"Ami Kawamoto, Masahiro Hashida, Katsuyasu Ishida, Kei Furihata, Aisaku Ota, Kaori Takahashi, Sachiko Sakakibara, Takashi Nakano, Fumihiko Takeshita","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DS-5670d is a monovalent lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. This phase 3 non-inferiority study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d according to participant immune status.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>Participants aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. The primary efficacy endpoint was geometric mean titer (GMT) of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) and seroresponse rate at day 29 after study vaccine administration in the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 versus BNT162b2, n = 363). Prespecified non-inferiority margins required that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 0.67 for the GMT ratio and -10% for the difference in seroresponse. The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401). Seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2); adjusted difference 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded the non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent immunogenicity differences according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. The main study limitation was the short duration of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424).</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 10","pages":"e1004499"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immunogenicity and safety of DS-5670d, an omicron XBB.1.5-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: A phase 3, randomized, active-controlled study.\",\"authors\":\"Ami Kawamoto, Masahiro Hashida, Katsuyasu Ishida, Kei Furihata, Aisaku Ota, Kaori Takahashi, Sachiko Sakakibara, Takashi Nakano, Fumihiko Takeshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>DS-5670d is a monovalent lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. This phase 3 non-inferiority study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d according to participant immune status.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>Participants aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. The primary efficacy endpoint was geometric mean titer (GMT) of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) and seroresponse rate at day 29 after study vaccine administration in the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 versus BNT162b2, n = 363). Prespecified non-inferiority margins required that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 0.67 for the GMT ratio and -10% for the difference in seroresponse. The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401). Seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2); adjusted difference 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded the non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent immunogenicity differences according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. The main study limitation was the short duration of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 10\",\"pages\":\"e1004499\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLoS Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004499","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:DS-5670d是一种单价脂质纳米粒子-信使核糖核酸疫苗,抗严重急性呼吸综合征-冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2),含有一组微米xbb .1.5衍生抗原。这项3期非劣效性研究根据参与者的免疫状态评估了单剂量DS-5670d的免疫原性和安全性。方法和研究结果:年龄≥12岁的参与者根据其既往SARS-CoV-2感染史和既往冠状病毒2019疫苗接种史(亚群A)、既往仅感染史(亚群B)、既往仅接种史(亚群C)或无感染史或疫苗接种史(亚群D)进行分层,并随机分配(1:1)接受DS-5670d或单价BNT162b2组粒XBB.1.5。主要疗效终点是在联合ABC亚群(DS-5670d, n = 362 vs BNT162b2, n = 363)接种疫苗后第29天对SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5)血液中和活性的几何平均滴度(GMT)和血清反应率。预先指定的非劣效性边际要求GMT比的95%置信区间(CI)的下限超过0.67,血清反应差异的下限超过-10%。校正后的GMT比值为1.218(95%可信区间[CI], 1.059, 1.401)。血清缓解率分别为87.3% (DS-5670d)和82.9% (BNT162b2);调整后差异为4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71)。这两个结果都超过了非劣效性边缘,研究达到了主要终点。总体ABCD人群的免疫原性数据也符合非劣效性标准。根据年龄或性别,没有明显的免疫原性差异,分析表明,即使未接种疫苗的人在单剂DS-5670d后也能获得足够的免疫应答。在研究疫苗接种组之间,不良事件的发生率或严重程度没有重大差异。研究的主要局限是随访时间短。结论:单剂DS-5670d在免疫原性上不逊于BNT162b2,在有或没有感染史和/或疫苗接种史的人群中具有可接受的安全性。日本临床试验注册中心(jRCT2031230424)。
Immunogenicity and safety of DS-5670d, an omicron XBB.1.5-targeting COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: A phase 3, randomized, active-controlled study.
Background: DS-5670d is a monovalent lipid nanoparticle-messenger ribonucleic acid vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), containing an omicron XBB.1.5-derived antigen. This phase 3 non-inferiority study assessed the immunogenicity and safety of a single dose of DS-5670d according to participant immune status.
Methods and findings: Participants aged ≥12 years were stratified according to their history of both prior SARS-CoV-2 infection plus prior coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination (subpopulation A), prior infection only (subpopulation B), prior vaccination only (subpopulation C), or no history of either infection or vaccination (subpopulation D), and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive DS-5670d or monovalent BNT162b2 omicron XBB.1.5. The primary efficacy endpoint was geometric mean titer (GMT) of blood neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2 (omicron XBB.1.5) and seroresponse rate at day 29 after study vaccine administration in the combined ABC subpopulations (DS-5670d, n = 362 versus BNT162b2, n = 363). Prespecified non-inferiority margins required that the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) exceeded 0.67 for the GMT ratio and -10% for the difference in seroresponse. The adjusted GMT ratio was 1.218 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.059, 1.401). Seroresponse rates were 87.3% (DS-5670d) and 82.9% (BNT162b2); adjusted difference 4.5% (95% CI, -0.70, 9.71). Both results exceeded the non-inferiority margins and the study met the primary endpoint. Immunogenicity data in the overall ABCD population also met non-inferiority criteria. There were no apparent immunogenicity differences according to age or sex, and analyses suggested that even unvaccinated persons achieved an adequate immune response following a single dose of DS-5670d. There were no major differences in the incidence or severity of adverse events between the study vaccination groups. The main study limitation was the short duration of follow-up.
Conclusions: A single dose of DS-5670d was immunogenically non-inferior to BNT162b2 and acceptably safe in persons with or without a history of prior infection and/or vaccination. Trial registration Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT2031230424).
期刊介绍:
PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings.
The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination.
PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.