2019冠状病毒病期间维持基本卫生服务:来自亚洲、撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲的卫生系统复原力跨国经验。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Moytrayee Guha, Arielle Cohen Tanugi-Carresse, Lucia Mullen, Sara Bennett, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze, Andrea M Prado, Piya Hanvoravongchai, Magdalena Rathe, Julius Fobil, Ravindra Prasan Rannan-Eliya, Andy A Pearson, Claudio A Mora-García, Paul Cheh, Rawlance Ndejjo, Steven Ndugwa Kabwama, Duah Dwomoh, Suzanne Kiwanuka, Wasin Laohavinij, Melanie Coates, Laura Rathe, Nilmini Wijemunige, Zachary Hennenfent, William Wang, Siobhan Lazenby, Anne Liu, Jennifer B Nuzzo
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病期间维持基本卫生服务:来自亚洲、撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲的卫生系统复原力跨国经验。","authors":"Moytrayee Guha, Arielle Cohen Tanugi-Carresse, Lucia Mullen, Sara Bennett, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze, Andrea M Prado, Piya Hanvoravongchai, Magdalena Rathe, Julius Fobil, Ravindra Prasan Rannan-Eliya, Andy A Pearson, Claudio A Mora-García, Paul Cheh, Rawlance Ndejjo, Steven Ndugwa Kabwama, Duah Dwomoh, Suzanne Kiwanuka, Wasin Laohavinij, Melanie Coates, Laura Rathe, Nilmini Wijemunige, Zachary Hennenfent, William Wang, Siobhan Lazenby, Anne Liu, Jennifer B Nuzzo","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the delivery of essential health services (EHS) worldwide, contributing to excess morbidity and mortality from preventable conditions. Some countries employed innovative strategies that may have enabled their health systems to be more resilient than others in responding to COVID-19. This cross-country analysis aimed to identify beneficial practices and policies employed by six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America to maintain access to EHS while responding to COVID-19. Cross-country research partners (CCRPs) led a mixed methods assessment to identify best practices and strategies for COVID-19 response and continued provision of EHS between April 2021 and September 2022. A cross-country analysis was conducted to extract and thematically code best practices that were reported as beneficial by three or more study countries based on desk reviews, key informant interviews and quantitative and qualitative analyses. Cross-cutting enablers, barriers and lessons learnt were also documented. Cross-country themes include whole-of-government approaches; multisectoral collaboration and decision-making; early outbreak control measures; partnerships with the private sector; innovations in service delivery and health financing; a robust health workforce; adaptation of existing disease response capacities; and community engagement. Long-standing investments in health systems strengthening and preparedness, integrated health systems, public trust in government, leadership and political will, prior experience in responding to epidemics, strong primary healthcare systems, existing health financing mechanisms and provision of social and economic supports were identified as cross-cutting enablers. Lack of context-specific definitions for EHS, inequitable access to technology and lack of access to real-time, high-quality data were identified as challenges in study countries. This study provides valuable insights into the practices that may be considered beneficial and worthy of pursuit by other countries wishing to strengthen health system resilience and preparedness for future health emergencies. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these practices in different settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"8 Suppl 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintaining essential health services during COVID-19: cross-country lessons of health system resilience from Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.\",\"authors\":\"Moytrayee Guha, Arielle Cohen Tanugi-Carresse, Lucia Mullen, Sara Bennett, Rhoda Kitti Wanyenze, Andrea M Prado, Piya Hanvoravongchai, Magdalena Rathe, Julius Fobil, Ravindra Prasan Rannan-Eliya, Andy A Pearson, Claudio A Mora-García, Paul Cheh, Rawlance Ndejjo, Steven Ndugwa Kabwama, Duah Dwomoh, Suzanne Kiwanuka, Wasin Laohavinij, Melanie Coates, Laura Rathe, Nilmini Wijemunige, Zachary Hennenfent, William Wang, Siobhan Lazenby, Anne Liu, Jennifer B Nuzzo\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013392\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the delivery of essential health services (EHS) worldwide, contributing to excess morbidity and mortality from preventable conditions. Some countries employed innovative strategies that may have enabled their health systems to be more resilient than others in responding to COVID-19. This cross-country analysis aimed to identify beneficial practices and policies employed by six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America to maintain access to EHS while responding to COVID-19. Cross-country research partners (CCRPs) led a mixed methods assessment to identify best practices and strategies for COVID-19 response and continued provision of EHS between April 2021 and September 2022. A cross-country analysis was conducted to extract and thematically code best practices that were reported as beneficial by three or more study countries based on desk reviews, key informant interviews and quantitative and qualitative analyses. Cross-cutting enablers, barriers and lessons learnt were also documented. Cross-country themes include whole-of-government approaches; multisectoral collaboration and decision-making; early outbreak control measures; partnerships with the private sector; innovations in service delivery and health financing; a robust health workforce; adaptation of existing disease response capacities; and community engagement. Long-standing investments in health systems strengthening and preparedness, integrated health systems, public trust in government, leadership and political will, prior experience in responding to epidemics, strong primary healthcare systems, existing health financing mechanisms and provision of social and economic supports were identified as cross-cutting enablers. Lack of context-specific definitions for EHS, inequitable access to technology and lack of access to real-time, high-quality data were identified as challenges in study countries. This study provides valuable insights into the practices that may be considered beneficial and worthy of pursuit by other countries wishing to strengthen health system resilience and preparedness for future health emergencies. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these practices in different settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"8 Suppl 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013392\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行严重扰乱了全球基本卫生服务的提供,导致可预防疾病导致的发病率和死亡率过高。一些国家采用了创新战略,这可能使其卫生系统在应对COVID-19方面比其他国家更具韧性。这项跨国分析旨在确定亚洲、撒哈拉以南非洲和拉丁美洲六个低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)在应对COVID-19的同时保持获得EHS的有益做法和政策。跨国研究伙伴领导了一项混合方法评估,以确定2021年4月至2022年9月期间应对COVID-19和继续提供EHS的最佳做法和战略。进行了一项跨国分析,以便根据案头审查、关键信息提供者访谈以及定量和定性分析,从三个或三个以上的研究国家报告的有益最佳做法中提取并按主题进行编码。还记录了跨领域的推动因素、障碍和经验教训。跨国家的主题包括整个政府的做法;多部门协作和决策;早期疫情控制措施;与私营部门的伙伴关系;服务提供和卫生筹资方面的创新;强大的卫生人力队伍;调整现有的疾病应对能力;还有社区参与。在卫生系统加强和准备方面的长期投资、综合卫生系统、公众对政府的信任、领导和政治意愿、以前应对流行病的经验、强有力的初级卫生保健系统、现有卫生筹资机制以及提供社会和经济支持被确定为跨领域的促进因素。缺乏针对具体情况的EHS定义、获取技术的不公平以及缺乏获取实时、高质量数据的途径被确定为研究国家面临的挑战。本研究为希望加强卫生系统复原力和应对未来突发卫生事件的准备工作的其他国家可能认为有益和值得采用的做法提供了宝贵的见解。需要进一步的研究来评估这些做法在不同情况下的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintaining essential health services during COVID-19: cross-country lessons of health system resilience from Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted the delivery of essential health services (EHS) worldwide, contributing to excess morbidity and mortality from preventable conditions. Some countries employed innovative strategies that may have enabled their health systems to be more resilient than others in responding to COVID-19. This cross-country analysis aimed to identify beneficial practices and policies employed by six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) in Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America to maintain access to EHS while responding to COVID-19. Cross-country research partners (CCRPs) led a mixed methods assessment to identify best practices and strategies for COVID-19 response and continued provision of EHS between April 2021 and September 2022. A cross-country analysis was conducted to extract and thematically code best practices that were reported as beneficial by three or more study countries based on desk reviews, key informant interviews and quantitative and qualitative analyses. Cross-cutting enablers, barriers and lessons learnt were also documented. Cross-country themes include whole-of-government approaches; multisectoral collaboration and decision-making; early outbreak control measures; partnerships with the private sector; innovations in service delivery and health financing; a robust health workforce; adaptation of existing disease response capacities; and community engagement. Long-standing investments in health systems strengthening and preparedness, integrated health systems, public trust in government, leadership and political will, prior experience in responding to epidemics, strong primary healthcare systems, existing health financing mechanisms and provision of social and economic supports were identified as cross-cutting enablers. Lack of context-specific definitions for EHS, inequitable access to technology and lack of access to real-time, high-quality data were identified as challenges in study countries. This study provides valuable insights into the practices that may be considered beneficial and worthy of pursuit by other countries wishing to strengthen health system resilience and preparedness for future health emergencies. Further research is needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these practices in different settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信