Lara Marie Aschenbrenner, Stella Brogna, Tobias Teismann, Adriana Frei, Marie-Anna Sedlinská, Heide Glaesmer, Thomas Forkmann, Sebstian Walther, Anna Ehnvall, Anja Gysin-Maillart
{"title":"自杀和非自杀人群的心理疼痛:来自翻译德语Mee-Bunney心理疼痛评估量表的发现。","authors":"Lara Marie Aschenbrenner, Stella Brogna, Tobias Teismann, Adriana Frei, Marie-Anna Sedlinská, Heide Glaesmer, Thomas Forkmann, Sebstian Walther, Anna Ehnvall, Anja Gysin-Maillart","doi":"10.1080/13811118.2025.2573059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessing psychological pain is crucial for evaluating suicide risk. This study examined differences in psychological pain between patients with suicide attempts, those with suicidal ideation, clinical, and non-clinical controls using a newly translated German version of the <i>Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale</i> (MBPPAS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with two independent samples collected a different sites (sample 1: <i>n</i> = 409; sample 2: <i>n</i> = 171), resulting in a total sample of <i>N</i> = 580 (59% female; age: <i>M</i> = 34.6, <i>SD</i> = 13.2). All analyses were conducted on the combined full sample. Participants were divided into four groups: patients with a suicide attempt (SUAT), patients with suicidal ideation but no lifetime suicide attempt (SUID), clinical control patients without suicidal ideation or attempts (CLIN), and non-clinical control participants (HLTH). MBPPAS scores were compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SUAT reported significantly higher psychological pain than SUID (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.42), CLIN (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 1.46), and HLTH (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 1.04). SUID had significantly higher MBPPAS scores than both CLIN (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 3.01) and HLTH (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 2.57). Internal consistency of the German MBPPAS was excellent (α = .93, ω = .93), and the scale showed good psychometric properties regarding convergent, incremental, and criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight significant differences in psychological pain across clinical and control groups, supporting the utility of the German MBPPAS in identifying psychological pain in patients at varying levels of suicide risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8325,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Suicide Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Pain in Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Populations: Findings from the Translated German Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale.\",\"authors\":\"Lara Marie Aschenbrenner, Stella Brogna, Tobias Teismann, Adriana Frei, Marie-Anna Sedlinská, Heide Glaesmer, Thomas Forkmann, Sebstian Walther, Anna Ehnvall, Anja Gysin-Maillart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13811118.2025.2573059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assessing psychological pain is crucial for evaluating suicide risk. This study examined differences in psychological pain between patients with suicide attempts, those with suicidal ideation, clinical, and non-clinical controls using a newly translated German version of the <i>Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale</i> (MBPPAS).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted with two independent samples collected a different sites (sample 1: <i>n</i> = 409; sample 2: <i>n</i> = 171), resulting in a total sample of <i>N</i> = 580 (59% female; age: <i>M</i> = 34.6, <i>SD</i> = 13.2). All analyses were conducted on the combined full sample. Participants were divided into four groups: patients with a suicide attempt (SUAT), patients with suicidal ideation but no lifetime suicide attempt (SUID), clinical control patients without suicidal ideation or attempts (CLIN), and non-clinical control participants (HLTH). MBPPAS scores were compared across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SUAT reported significantly higher psychological pain than SUID (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 0.42), CLIN (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 1.46), and HLTH (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 1.04). SUID had significantly higher MBPPAS scores than both CLIN (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 3.01) and HLTH (<i>p</i> < .001, <i>d</i> = 2.57). Internal consistency of the German MBPPAS was excellent (α = .93, ω = .93), and the scale showed good psychometric properties regarding convergent, incremental, and criterion validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings highlight significant differences in psychological pain across clinical and control groups, supporting the utility of the German MBPPAS in identifying psychological pain in patients at varying levels of suicide risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Suicide Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2573059\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Suicide Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2025.2573059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:心理疼痛评估是评估自杀风险的关键。本研究使用新翻译的德文版Mee-Bunney心理疼痛评估量表(MBPPAS),检查了自杀未遂患者、有自杀意念患者、临床对照和非临床对照之间心理疼痛的差异。方法:采用横断面研究方法,选取两个不同地点的独立样本(样本1:n = 409;样本2:n = 171),总样本n = 580,其中女性59%,年龄M = 34.6, SD = 13.2。所有的分析都是在合并的全样本上进行的。参与者被分为四组:有自杀企图的患者(SUAT)、有自杀意念但没有终身自杀企图的患者(SUID)、没有自杀意念或企图的临床对照患者(CLIN)和非临床对照患者(HLTH)。MBPPAS得分在各组间进行比较。结果:SUAT报告的心理疼痛明显高于SUID (p d = 0.42)、CLIN (p d = 1.46)和HLTH (p d = 1.04)。SUID的MBPPAS评分明显高于CLIN (p d = 3.01)和HLTH (p d = 2.57)。德国MBPPAS量表的内部一致性极好(α = 0.93, ω = 0.93),量表在收敛性、增量性和效度方面表现出良好的心理测量特性。结论:研究结果强调了临床组和对照组在心理疼痛方面的显著差异,支持了德国MBPPAS在识别不同自杀风险水平患者的心理疼痛方面的效用。
Psychological Pain in Suicidal and Non-Suicidal Populations: Findings from the Translated German Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale.
Objective: Assessing psychological pain is crucial for evaluating suicide risk. This study examined differences in psychological pain between patients with suicide attempts, those with suicidal ideation, clinical, and non-clinical controls using a newly translated German version of the Mee-Bunney Psychological Pain Assessment Scale (MBPPAS).
Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted with two independent samples collected a different sites (sample 1: n = 409; sample 2: n = 171), resulting in a total sample of N = 580 (59% female; age: M = 34.6, SD = 13.2). All analyses were conducted on the combined full sample. Participants were divided into four groups: patients with a suicide attempt (SUAT), patients with suicidal ideation but no lifetime suicide attempt (SUID), clinical control patients without suicidal ideation or attempts (CLIN), and non-clinical control participants (HLTH). MBPPAS scores were compared across groups.
Results: SUAT reported significantly higher psychological pain than SUID (p < .001, d = 0.42), CLIN (p < .001, d = 1.46), and HLTH (p < .001, d = 1.04). SUID had significantly higher MBPPAS scores than both CLIN (p < .001, d = 3.01) and HLTH (p < .001, d = 2.57). Internal consistency of the German MBPPAS was excellent (α = .93, ω = .93), and the scale showed good psychometric properties regarding convergent, incremental, and criterion validity.
Conclusions: The findings highlight significant differences in psychological pain across clinical and control groups, supporting the utility of the German MBPPAS in identifying psychological pain in patients at varying levels of suicide risk.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Suicide Research, the official journal of the International Academy of Suicide Research (IASR), is the international journal in the field of suicidology. The journal features original, refereed contributions on the study of suicide, suicidal behavior, its causes and effects, and techniques for prevention. The journal incorporates research-based and theoretical articles contributed by a diverse range of authors interested in investigating the biological, pharmacological, psychiatric, psychological, and sociological aspects of suicide.