CYP3A5药物基因组学对肺移植后早期他克莫司与唑类抗真菌药物合用推荐剂量的准确性。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman
{"title":"CYP3A5药物基因组学对肺移植后早期他克莫司与唑类抗真菌药物合用推荐剂量的准确性。","authors":"Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":"e70345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of CYP3A5 Pharmacogenomics Recommended Dosing of Tacrolimus With Concomitant Azole Antifungals Early Post-Lung Transplant.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"e70345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床药物遗传学实施联盟(CPIC)指南推荐他克莫司起始剂量基于CYP3A5表型,但不考虑CYP3A4相互作用。唑类药物抑制CYP3A4代谢,并有研究表明,唑类药物可使他克莫司剂量减少%。我们评估了CPIC根据CYP3A5表型在接受唑治疗的肺移植受体(lts)中推荐他克莫司剂量的准确性。方法:主要终点是lt后1、2、3 M时他克莫司实际剂量与预期剂量(mg/kg/天)的准确性(±30%)。次要结局是他克莫司的中位剂量(mg/kg/天)和他克莫司在1 M、2 M和3 M之间的实际剂量与预期剂量的%差异。预期剂量的公式依次使用:(1)制造商推荐剂量,(2)CPIC起始剂量调整,(3)唑减少他克莫司剂量的%。每个病人作为自己的对照,计算剂量的百分比差异。结果:共纳入85个具有药理遗传信息的ltr;91%为CYP3A5代谢不良者。CPIC和唑调整剂量在1 M、2 M和3 M时准确性下降(40%、29%和18%;p = 0.002)。CYP3A5表达者和非表达者之间的准确性在1 M时没有差异(38%对40%,p = 1.00),但在2 M(75%对25%,p = 0.002)和3 M(63%对14%,p = 0.002)时差异显著。结论:基于CYP3A5表型和预测的唑类CYP3A4抑制作用调整的他克莫司起始剂量对CYP3A5非表达者移植后早期ltr实际需要的他克莫司剂量预测较差。CYP3A5表达者显示出更高的准确性,并将受益于在更大的队列中进一步的研究。在lt后最初3 M内接受唑类抗真菌药物治疗的ltr需要降低他克莫司剂量并进行患者特异性修改,以确保治疗水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of CYP3A5 Pharmacogenomics Recommended Dosing of Tacrolimus With Concomitant Azole Antifungals Early Post-Lung Transplant.

Introduction: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.

Methods: The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.

Results: 85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).

Conclusions: Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Transplantation
Clinical Transplantation 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
286
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored. Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include: Immunology and immunosuppression; Patient preparation; Social, ethical, and psychological issues; Complications, short- and long-term results; Artificial organs; Donation and preservation of organ and tissue; Translational studies; Advances in tissue typing; Updates on transplant pathology;. Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries. Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信