Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman
{"title":"CYP3A5药物基因组学对肺移植后早期他克莫司与唑类抗真菌药物合用推荐剂量的准确性。","authors":"Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 10","pages":"e70345"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of CYP3A5 Pharmacogenomics Recommended Dosing of Tacrolimus With Concomitant Azole Antifungals Early Post-Lung Transplant.\",\"authors\":\"Christine Pham, Kathy Le, Curt Bay, Rhiannon Garcia, Michael D Nailor, Kellie J Goodlet, Sofya Tokman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ctr.70345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"39 10\",\"pages\":\"e70345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70345\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.70345","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of CYP3A5 Pharmacogenomics Recommended Dosing of Tacrolimus With Concomitant Azole Antifungals Early Post-Lung Transplant.
Introduction: Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines recommend tacrolimus starting doses based on CYP3A5 phenotypes but do not consider CYP3A4 interactions. Azoles inhibit CYP3A4 metabolism, and suggested % reduction in tacrolimus dose by azole has been published. We evaluated the accuracy of CPIC tacrolimus dose recommendations based on CYP3A5 phenotype in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) treated with azole.
Methods: The primary outcome was accuracy (±30%) of actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Secondary outcomes were median tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) and % difference in actual vs. expected tacrolimus dose between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M. Formulas for expected dose were used sequentially: (1) manufacturer-recommended dose, (2) CPIC starting dose adjustment, and (3) % tacrolimus dose reduction by azole. Each patient served as their own control for calculating the % difference in dose.
Results: 85 LTRs with pharmacogenetic information were included; 91% were poor CYP3A5 metabolizers. Accuracy of CPIC and azole adjusted dose decreased at 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M (40%, 29%, and 18%; p = 0.002). Accuracy between CYP3A5 expressers and non-expressers did not show a difference at 1 M (38% vs. 40%, p = 1.00), but differences were significant at 2 M (75% vs. 25%, p = 0.002) and 3 M (63% vs. 14%, p = 0.002). Tacrolimus dose (mg/kg/day) decreased (0.03, 0.02, 0.02; p < 0.001) and % difference in actual vs. expected dose increased (-22, -35, -46; p < 0.001) between 1 M, 2 M, and 3 M post-LT. Percent difference in actual vs. expected dose was not found to be significant between phenotypes (p = 0.067).
Conclusions: Use of an adjusted tacrolimus starting dose based on CYP3A5 phenotype and predicted azole CYP3A4 inhibition was poorly predictive of the actual required tacrolimus dose among LTRs during the early post-transplant period in CYP3A5 non-expressers. CYP3A5 expressers demonstrated a higher degree of accuracy and would benefit from further investigation in a larger cohort. Lower tacrolimus doses with patient-specific modifications are required in LTRs within the first 3 M post-LT receiving azole antifungals to ensure therapeutic levels.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.