在初级前交叉韧带重建中增加外侧关节外手术与独眼病变和活动范围受限的进一步手术率增加有关。

IF 5
Timothy Voskuijl, Kate E Webster, Timothy S Whitehead, Haydn J Klemm, Lachlan M Batty, Julian A Feller
{"title":"在初级前交叉韧带重建中增加外侧关节外手术与独眼病变和活动范围受限的进一步手术率增加有关。","authors":"Timothy Voskuijl, Kate E Webster, Timothy S Whitehead, Haydn J Klemm, Lachlan M Batty, Julian A Feller","doi":"10.1002/ksa.70089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been a resurgence in the use of a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a LEAP in the setting of a primary ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased rate of reoperation for loss of range of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive cohort of patients aged less than 30 years who received a primary hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2021 was retrospectively analysed. The usage of a modified Ellison LEAP in this cohort increased from 0% in 2016 to 51% in 2021. Reoperation rates for loss of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion during the first year after surgery, as well as knee extension deficits at 12 months, were compared between LEAP and no-LEAP patients. Contingency analyses with risk ratio (RR) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1076 patients were included in this study [59.6% male, mean age 21.6 (SD 4.4) years, 84.9% hamstring tendon autografts]. In 17.3% (186/1076) of the patients the ACL reconstruction was augmented with a modified Ellison procedure. Of this group [67.2% male, mean age 18.8 (SD 3.7) years, 79.6% hamstring tendon autografts], 8.1% (confidence interval (CI) 4.2%-12%) required further surgery for restricted motion or a cyclops lesion in the first year after surgery, compared to 3.8% (CI 2.6%-5.1%) in the no-LEAP group (risk ratio (RR) 2.1, p = 0.012). The difference in reoperation rates between those with and those without LEAP was more marked for patients who received a quadriceps tendon autograft (13.2% vs. 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019), compared to patients treated with a hamstring tendon autograft (6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122). There was no significant difference in extension deficit at 12 months between patients with and those without a LEAP (mean 1.02 ± SD 2.6 degrees vs. mean 0.97 ± SD 2.4 degrees, p = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical intervention for a loss of range of motion or symptomatic cyclops lesion in the first postoperative year after primary ACL reconstruction was more common in patients who had an additional LEAP than in those who did not. The higher intervention rate was more apparent in patients who had a quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":520702,"journal":{"name":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of further surgery for cyclops lesions and restricted range of motion.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy Voskuijl, Kate E Webster, Timothy S Whitehead, Haydn J Klemm, Lachlan M Batty, Julian A Feller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ksa.70089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There has been a resurgence in the use of a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a LEAP in the setting of a primary ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased rate of reoperation for loss of range of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A consecutive cohort of patients aged less than 30 years who received a primary hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2021 was retrospectively analysed. The usage of a modified Ellison LEAP in this cohort increased from 0% in 2016 to 51% in 2021. Reoperation rates for loss of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion during the first year after surgery, as well as knee extension deficits at 12 months, were compared between LEAP and no-LEAP patients. Contingency analyses with risk ratio (RR) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1076 patients were included in this study [59.6% male, mean age 21.6 (SD 4.4) years, 84.9% hamstring tendon autografts]. In 17.3% (186/1076) of the patients the ACL reconstruction was augmented with a modified Ellison procedure. Of this group [67.2% male, mean age 18.8 (SD 3.7) years, 79.6% hamstring tendon autografts], 8.1% (confidence interval (CI) 4.2%-12%) required further surgery for restricted motion or a cyclops lesion in the first year after surgery, compared to 3.8% (CI 2.6%-5.1%) in the no-LEAP group (risk ratio (RR) 2.1, p = 0.012). The difference in reoperation rates between those with and those without LEAP was more marked for patients who received a quadriceps tendon autograft (13.2% vs. 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019), compared to patients treated with a hamstring tendon autograft (6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122). There was no significant difference in extension deficit at 12 months between patients with and those without a LEAP (mean 1.02 ± SD 2.6 degrees vs. mean 0.97 ± SD 2.4 degrees, p = 0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical intervention for a loss of range of motion or symptomatic cyclops lesion in the first postoperative year after primary ACL reconstruction was more common in patients who had an additional LEAP than in those who did not. The higher intervention rate was more apparent in patients who had a quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.70089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:为了降低移植物失败的风险,外侧关节外手术(LEAP)与前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的应用再次抬头。本研究的目的是检查在原发性ACL重建中使用LEAP是否与运动范围丧失或症状性独眼病变的再手术率增加有关。方法:回顾性分析2016年1月至2021年12月期间接受原发性腘绳肌腱或自体股四头肌腱ACL重建的年龄小于30岁的连续队列患者。改良型埃里森LEAP的使用率从2016年的0%上升到2021年的51%。比较LEAP和非LEAP患者在术后一年内运动丧失或症状性独眼病变的再手术率,以及12个月时膝关节伸展缺陷。计算风险比(RR)的偶然性分析。结果:本研究共纳入1076例患者,其中59.6%为男性,平均年龄21.6岁(SD 4.4)岁,84.9%为自体腘绳肌腱移植。17.3%(186/1076)的患者采用改良的Ellison手术增强ACL重建。在该组中[67.2%为男性,平均年龄18.8岁(SD 3.7), 79.6%为自体腘绳肌腱移植],8.1%(可信区间(CI) 4.2%-12%)在术后第一年因运动受限或独眼病变需要进一步手术,而非leap组为3.8% (CI 2.6%-5.1%)(风险比(RR) 2.1, p = 0.012)。接受自体股四头肌肌腱移植的患者与接受自体腘绳肌腱移植的患者再手术率的差异更为显著(13.2% vs 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019),而接受自体腘绳肌腱移植的患者的再手术率差异更为显著(6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122)。在12个月时,有和没有LEAP的患者的伸展缺损无显著差异(平均1.02±SD 2.6度vs平均0.97±SD 2.4度,p = 0.85)。结论:原发性前交叉韧带重建术后第一年出现活动范围丧失或症状性独眼病变的手术干预在有额外LEAP的患者中比没有LEAP的患者更常见。自体股四头肌腱重建前交叉韧带的患者干预率更高。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The addition of a lateral extra-articular procedure to a primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with an increased rate of further surgery for cyclops lesions and restricted range of motion.

Purpose: There has been a resurgence in the use of a lateral extra-articular procedure (LEAP) in association with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to reduce the risk of graft failure. The aim of this study was to examine whether the use of a LEAP in the setting of a primary ACL reconstruction was associated with an increased rate of reoperation for loss of range of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion.

Methods: A consecutive cohort of patients aged less than 30 years who received a primary hamstring or quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2021 was retrospectively analysed. The usage of a modified Ellison LEAP in this cohort increased from 0% in 2016 to 51% in 2021. Reoperation rates for loss of motion or a symptomatic cyclops lesion during the first year after surgery, as well as knee extension deficits at 12 months, were compared between LEAP and no-LEAP patients. Contingency analyses with risk ratio (RR) were calculated.

Results: A total of 1076 patients were included in this study [59.6% male, mean age 21.6 (SD 4.4) years, 84.9% hamstring tendon autografts]. In 17.3% (186/1076) of the patients the ACL reconstruction was augmented with a modified Ellison procedure. Of this group [67.2% male, mean age 18.8 (SD 3.7) years, 79.6% hamstring tendon autografts], 8.1% (confidence interval (CI) 4.2%-12%) required further surgery for restricted motion or a cyclops lesion in the first year after surgery, compared to 3.8% (CI 2.6%-5.1%) in the no-LEAP group (risk ratio (RR) 2.1, p = 0.012). The difference in reoperation rates between those with and those without LEAP was more marked for patients who received a quadriceps tendon autograft (13.2% vs. 3.2%, RR 4.1, p = 0.019), compared to patients treated with a hamstring tendon autograft (6.8% vs. 3.9%, RR 1.8, p = 0.122). There was no significant difference in extension deficit at 12 months between patients with and those without a LEAP (mean 1.02 ± SD 2.6 degrees vs. mean 0.97 ± SD 2.4 degrees, p = 0.85).

Conclusion: Surgical intervention for a loss of range of motion or symptomatic cyclops lesion in the first postoperative year after primary ACL reconstruction was more common in patients who had an additional LEAP than in those who did not. The higher intervention rate was more apparent in patients who had a quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信