农村社区药房长期居家护理服务的实施与评价

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i1.6469
Megan Ditzman, Stevie Veach, Jessie Schaefer, Kaitlin Luett, Bryan Kendall, Matthew Witry
{"title":"农村社区药房长期居家护理服务的实施与评价","authors":"Megan Ditzman, Stevie Veach, Jessie Schaefer, Kaitlin Luett, Bryan Kendall, Matthew Witry","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i1.6469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The majority of older Americans are expected to need some level of institutional long term care. Community pharmacies are positioned to delay this need by supporting medication management. There are potential mechanisms for pharmacists to deliver long term care at home (Home LTC) services and bill insurers for services that may delay the transition to a higher level of care. <i>Objectives:</i> This project aims to evaluate the implementation of a community pharmacy delivered Home LTC service in a rural community. The objectives were to: 1) describe implementation and challenges of pharmacy-provided HOME LTC services, 2) attempt billing for Home LTC services, 3) describe pharmacist clinical interventions including drug therapy problems (DTPs) and 4) measure patient/caregiver satisfaction with the service. <i>Methods:</i> This was a pilot evaluation of a community pharmacist delivered intervention. Patient eligibility requirements include taking 6+ medications, having 3+ chronic conditions, and having 2+ limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). All participants received a comprehensive medication review. Pharmacy staff prepared medications in monthly adherence packaging and delivery was offered. Home visits were performed by the pharmacist as needed. A post study survey assessed satisfaction and invited suggestions for improvement. Patient characteristics, DTPs, interventions, reimbursement attempts and amounts, and survey responses were documented, and analyzed descriptively. <i>Results:</i> Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study - 3 living in a group home and 7 were already receiving adherence packaging. All 14 patients received at least 1 clinical intervention, and 4 home visits were conducted. Seven patients (50%) completed the satisfaction survey and reported universally high satisfaction with the service elements. <i>Conclusion:</i> Overall, implementing a HOME LTC service was successful, however, the pharmacy failed to be reimbursed for service elements, including adherence packaging. Patients were satisfied with the service. Bridging the reimbursement gap is critical to sustainably provide patients with this desired service.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509710/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Evaluation of a Long term Care at Home (Home LTC) Service in a Rural Community Pharmacy Setting.\",\"authors\":\"Megan Ditzman, Stevie Veach, Jessie Schaefer, Kaitlin Luett, Bryan Kendall, Matthew Witry\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v16i1.6469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> The majority of older Americans are expected to need some level of institutional long term care. Community pharmacies are positioned to delay this need by supporting medication management. There are potential mechanisms for pharmacists to deliver long term care at home (Home LTC) services and bill insurers for services that may delay the transition to a higher level of care. <i>Objectives:</i> This project aims to evaluate the implementation of a community pharmacy delivered Home LTC service in a rural community. The objectives were to: 1) describe implementation and challenges of pharmacy-provided HOME LTC services, 2) attempt billing for Home LTC services, 3) describe pharmacist clinical interventions including drug therapy problems (DTPs) and 4) measure patient/caregiver satisfaction with the service. <i>Methods:</i> This was a pilot evaluation of a community pharmacist delivered intervention. Patient eligibility requirements include taking 6+ medications, having 3+ chronic conditions, and having 2+ limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). All participants received a comprehensive medication review. Pharmacy staff prepared medications in monthly adherence packaging and delivery was offered. Home visits were performed by the pharmacist as needed. A post study survey assessed satisfaction and invited suggestions for improvement. Patient characteristics, DTPs, interventions, reimbursement attempts and amounts, and survey responses were documented, and analyzed descriptively. <i>Results:</i> Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study - 3 living in a group home and 7 were already receiving adherence packaging. All 14 patients received at least 1 clinical intervention, and 4 home visits were conducted. Seven patients (50%) completed the satisfaction survey and reported universally high satisfaction with the service elements. <i>Conclusion:</i> Overall, implementing a HOME LTC service was successful, however, the pharmacy failed to be reimbursed for service elements, including adherence packaging. Patients were satisfied with the service. Bridging the reimbursement gap is critical to sustainably provide patients with this desired service.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509710/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i1.6469\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i1.6469","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大多数美国老年人预计需要某种程度的机构长期护理。社区药房的定位是通过支持药物管理来推迟这一需求。药剂师提供长期居家护理(居家LTC)服务和向保险公司支付可能延迟向更高水平护理过渡的服务的潜在机制。目的:本项目旨在评估社区药房上门LTC服务在农村社区的实施情况。研究的目标是:1)描述药房提供的家庭长期服务的实施和挑战;2)尝试为家庭长期服务计费;3)描述药剂师的临床干预措施,包括药物治疗问题(dtp); 4)衡量患者/护理人员对服务的满意度。方法:这是一个社区药剂师提供干预的试点评估。患者资格要求包括服用6种以上药物,患有3种以上慢性疾病,日常生活活动受限(adl) 2种以上。所有参与者都接受了全面的药物评估。药房工作人员准备的药物每月坚持包装和交付提供。药剂师根据需要进行家访。一项研究后调查评估了满意度,并征求了改进建议。记录了患者特征、dtp、干预措施、报销尝试和金额以及调查结果,并进行了描述性分析。结果:14名患者参加了这项研究,其中3名住在集体之家,7名已经接受了依从性包装。14例患者均接受了至少1次临床干预,并进行了4次家访。7名患者(50%)完成了满意度调查,并对服务要素普遍表示高度满意。结论:总体而言,实施HOME LTC服务是成功的,然而,药房未能获得包括依从性包装在内的服务要素的报销。病人对服务很满意。弥补报销差距对于持续地为患者提供所需的服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Implementation and Evaluation of a Long term Care at Home (Home LTC) Service in a Rural Community Pharmacy Setting.

Implementation and Evaluation of a Long term Care at Home (Home LTC) Service in a Rural Community Pharmacy Setting.

Background: The majority of older Americans are expected to need some level of institutional long term care. Community pharmacies are positioned to delay this need by supporting medication management. There are potential mechanisms for pharmacists to deliver long term care at home (Home LTC) services and bill insurers for services that may delay the transition to a higher level of care. Objectives: This project aims to evaluate the implementation of a community pharmacy delivered Home LTC service in a rural community. The objectives were to: 1) describe implementation and challenges of pharmacy-provided HOME LTC services, 2) attempt billing for Home LTC services, 3) describe pharmacist clinical interventions including drug therapy problems (DTPs) and 4) measure patient/caregiver satisfaction with the service. Methods: This was a pilot evaluation of a community pharmacist delivered intervention. Patient eligibility requirements include taking 6+ medications, having 3+ chronic conditions, and having 2+ limitations in activities of daily living (ADLs). All participants received a comprehensive medication review. Pharmacy staff prepared medications in monthly adherence packaging and delivery was offered. Home visits were performed by the pharmacist as needed. A post study survey assessed satisfaction and invited suggestions for improvement. Patient characteristics, DTPs, interventions, reimbursement attempts and amounts, and survey responses were documented, and analyzed descriptively. Results: Fourteen patients were enrolled in the study - 3 living in a group home and 7 were already receiving adherence packaging. All 14 patients received at least 1 clinical intervention, and 4 home visits were conducted. Seven patients (50%) completed the satisfaction survey and reported universally high satisfaction with the service elements. Conclusion: Overall, implementing a HOME LTC service was successful, however, the pharmacy failed to be reimbursed for service elements, including adherence packaging. Patients were satisfied with the service. Bridging the reimbursement gap is critical to sustainably provide patients with this desired service.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信