评估二甲双胍和/或GLP-1或GLP-1/GIP受体激动剂对成年1型糖尿病患者每日胰岛素总剂量的影响

Innovations in pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.24926/iip.v16i1.6450
Mayeesha Ahmed, Emily Pierson, Molly Webster
{"title":"评估二甲双胍和/或GLP-1或GLP-1/GIP受体激动剂对成年1型糖尿病患者每日胰岛素总剂量的影响","authors":"Mayeesha Ahmed, Emily Pierson, Molly Webster","doi":"10.24926/iip.v16i1.6450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: There are few studies that have assessed the utility of metformin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in type 1 diabetes (T1D), specifically looking at glucose control indices. These studies have largely evaluated the impact of agents within the class that are not routinely used. Limited data exist on the use of the dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist (GLP-1/GIP RA) in T1D. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of this growing practice in utilizing these common non-insulin therapies in T1D. <i>Methods</i>: This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients with T1D who received standard insulin therapy plus the following non-insulin therapies for at least 3 months: metformin; GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA; or metformin and a GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA (combination group). Data points were collected on starting dates of the first and second (if applicable) non-insulin agents, and the first office visit of at least 3 months on maximum tolerated doses. The primary endpoint was change in total daily insulin dose (TDD). Secondary and safety endpoints were evaluated in A1c, weight, and hypoglycemia. <i>Results</i>: A total of 110 of 366 patients met inclusion criteria. Changes in average insulin TDD were +4.06, -5.9 and -6.9 units for the metformin, GLP-1RA or GLP-1/GIP RA, and combination groups respectively (P =0.013). TDD after non-insulin therapy addition decreased in all patients on average 3.54 units (P =0.02). Non-insulin therapies showed a significant decrease in A1c by 0.62%, weight by 3.8kg, and hypoglycemia was seen in 76% of patients. <i>Conclusions</i>: Non-insulin therapies added to standard insulin therapy in T1D resulted in decreased insulin requirement, increased glycemic control, and decreased body weight. While statistically significant, it remains unclear if the decreased insulin requirement is clinically significant. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":501014,"journal":{"name":"Innovations in pharmacy","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509713/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effect on Total Daily Insulin Dose in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Managed with Metformin and/or GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.\",\"authors\":\"Mayeesha Ahmed, Emily Pierson, Molly Webster\",\"doi\":\"10.24926/iip.v16i1.6450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>: There are few studies that have assessed the utility of metformin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in type 1 diabetes (T1D), specifically looking at glucose control indices. These studies have largely evaluated the impact of agents within the class that are not routinely used. Limited data exist on the use of the dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist (GLP-1/GIP RA) in T1D. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of this growing practice in utilizing these common non-insulin therapies in T1D. <i>Methods</i>: This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients with T1D who received standard insulin therapy plus the following non-insulin therapies for at least 3 months: metformin; GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA; or metformin and a GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA (combination group). Data points were collected on starting dates of the first and second (if applicable) non-insulin agents, and the first office visit of at least 3 months on maximum tolerated doses. The primary endpoint was change in total daily insulin dose (TDD). Secondary and safety endpoints were evaluated in A1c, weight, and hypoglycemia. <i>Results</i>: A total of 110 of 366 patients met inclusion criteria. Changes in average insulin TDD were +4.06, -5.9 and -6.9 units for the metformin, GLP-1RA or GLP-1/GIP RA, and combination groups respectively (P =0.013). TDD after non-insulin therapy addition decreased in all patients on average 3.54 units (P =0.02). Non-insulin therapies showed a significant decrease in A1c by 0.62%, weight by 3.8kg, and hypoglycemia was seen in 76% of patients. <i>Conclusions</i>: Non-insulin therapies added to standard insulin therapy in T1D resulted in decreased insulin requirement, increased glycemic control, and decreased body weight. While statistically significant, it remains unclear if the decreased insulin requirement is clinically significant. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12509713/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovations in pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i1.6450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations in pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v16i1.6450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:很少有研究评估二甲双胍和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)在1型糖尿病(T1D)中的效用,特别是观察血糖控制指标。这些研究在很大程度上评估了不经常使用的这类药物的影响。关于双胰高血糖素样肽-1/葡萄糖依赖性胰岛素性多肽受体激动剂(GLP-1/GIP RA)在T1D中的应用的数据有限。本研究的目的是评估在T1D中使用这些常见的非胰岛素治疗方法的效果。方法:这项单中心、回顾性队列研究评估了接受标准胰岛素治疗和以下非胰岛素治疗至少3个月的成年T1D患者:二甲双胍;GLP-1 RA或GLP-1/GIP RA;或二甲双胍和GLP-1 RA或GLP-1/GIP RA(联合组)。数据点收集于第一种和第二种(如果适用)非胰岛素药物的起始日期,以及最大耐受剂量至少3个月的首次门诊。主要终点是每日总胰岛素剂量(TDD)的变化。次要终点和安全性终点分别为A1c、体重和低血糖。结果:366例患者中有110例符合纳入标准。二甲双胍组、GLP-1RA组、GLP-1/GIP RA组和联合用药组平均胰岛素TDD变化分别为+4.06、-5.9和-6.9单位(P =0.013)。所有患者加用非胰岛素治疗后TDD平均降低3.54单位(P =0.02)。非胰岛素治疗显示糖化血红蛋白显著降低0.62%,体重显著降低3.8kg, 76%的患者出现低血糖。结论:T1D患者在标准胰岛素治疗的基础上增加非胰岛素治疗可降低胰岛素需求,提高血糖控制,降低体重。虽然具有统计学意义,但仍不清楚胰岛素需要量的降低是否具有临床意义。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating the Effect on Total Daily Insulin Dose in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Managed with Metformin and/or GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.

Evaluating the Effect on Total Daily Insulin Dose in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Managed with Metformin and/or GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.

Evaluating the Effect on Total Daily Insulin Dose in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Managed with Metformin and/or GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.

Evaluating the Effect on Total Daily Insulin Dose in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Managed with Metformin and/or GLP-1 or GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists.

Purpose: There are few studies that have assessed the utility of metformin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in type 1 diabetes (T1D), specifically looking at glucose control indices. These studies have largely evaluated the impact of agents within the class that are not routinely used. Limited data exist on the use of the dual glucagon-like peptide-1/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptor agonist (GLP-1/GIP RA) in T1D. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of this growing practice in utilizing these common non-insulin therapies in T1D. Methods: This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated adult patients with T1D who received standard insulin therapy plus the following non-insulin therapies for at least 3 months: metformin; GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA; or metformin and a GLP-1 RA or GLP-1/GIP RA (combination group). Data points were collected on starting dates of the first and second (if applicable) non-insulin agents, and the first office visit of at least 3 months on maximum tolerated doses. The primary endpoint was change in total daily insulin dose (TDD). Secondary and safety endpoints were evaluated in A1c, weight, and hypoglycemia. Results: A total of 110 of 366 patients met inclusion criteria. Changes in average insulin TDD were +4.06, -5.9 and -6.9 units for the metformin, GLP-1RA or GLP-1/GIP RA, and combination groups respectively (P =0.013). TDD after non-insulin therapy addition decreased in all patients on average 3.54 units (P =0.02). Non-insulin therapies showed a significant decrease in A1c by 0.62%, weight by 3.8kg, and hypoglycemia was seen in 76% of patients. Conclusions: Non-insulin therapies added to standard insulin therapy in T1D resulted in decreased insulin requirement, increased glycemic control, and decreased body weight. While statistically significant, it remains unclear if the decreased insulin requirement is clinically significant. Further prospective studies are warranted to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信