{"title":"人工智能辅助淋巴水肿教材在乳腺癌手术患者中的可理解性和可操作性：专家评价。","authors":"Gülseren Maraş Baydoğan, Yeliz Sürme, Handan Topan","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the artificial intelligence-assisted lymphedema education material in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comprehensive, successful methodological design was used to evaluate the portability of the expandable, AI-supported lymphedema education material for breast cancer. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE statement (see Data S1 for the completed STROBE [Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology] checklist). When preparing the AI-supported lymphedema education material managed with breast cancer treatment, it is first determined in the education of patients. Then, the commands of the Chat GBT-4 program are included in the scope of the transferred education content. For the created education content, readability was first evaluated and expert opinion was taken for the final version of the draft.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>While preparing the AI-assisted lymphedema education material in the study, expert opinions were obtained, and the educational needs of the patients were determined by scanning the literature. Then, 12 commands were given in the ChatGPT-4 program to create the educational content. Formulas were used to evaluate the readability of the created educational content in Turkish and the readability of the health literature. The validity of the lymphedema education material was presented to 10 experts. The experts evaluated the understandability and actionability of the educational material using the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool and the Global Quality Scale, which evaluates the quality of the educational material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was concluded that the readability index of the lymphedema education material for Turkish was 67.3, and the Turkish readability level was 'easily understandable'. The readability index of health literature was found to be 11.28, 9.68, 10.58, 39.0, and 11.26, respectively. When the internal consistency coefficient between the experts was examined, it was found to be 0.74. It was determined that the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool understandability score average was 92.10 ± 9.03, and the actionability score average was 81.60 ± 18.47. The Global Quality Scale score average, which evaluates the suitability and quality of the content of the AI-supported educational material, was found to be 4.10 ± 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the end of the study, it was determined that the educational material was reasonable regarding understandability and actionability. The Turkish readability level was also reasonable and easily understandable.</p><p><strong>Implication for the profession: </strong>This study is one of the proactive attempts to use AI in preparing educational materials for nurses and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understandability and Actionability of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Lymphedema Education Material in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: Expert Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Gülseren Maraş Baydoğan, Yeliz Sürme, Handan Topan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate the artificial intelligence-assisted lymphedema education material in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A comprehensive, successful methodological design was used to evaluate the portability of the expandable, AI-supported lymphedema education material for breast cancer. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE statement (see Data S1 for the completed STROBE [Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology] checklist). When preparing the AI-supported lymphedema education material managed with breast cancer treatment, it is first determined in the education of patients. Then, the commands of the Chat GBT-4 program are included in the scope of the transferred education content. For the created education content, readability was first evaluated and expert opinion was taken for the final version of the draft.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>While preparing the AI-assisted lymphedema education material in the study, expert opinions were obtained, and the educational needs of the patients were determined by scanning the literature. Then, 12 commands were given in the ChatGPT-4 program to create the educational content. Formulas were used to evaluate the readability of the created educational content in Turkish and the readability of the health literature. The validity of the lymphedema education material was presented to 10 experts. The experts evaluated the understandability and actionability of the educational material using the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool and the Global Quality Scale, which evaluates the quality of the educational material.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was concluded that the readability index of the lymphedema education material for Turkish was 67.3, and the Turkish readability level was 'easily understandable'. The readability index of health literature was found to be 11.28, 9.68, 10.58, 39.0, and 11.26, respectively. When the internal consistency coefficient between the experts was examined, it was found to be 0.74. It was determined that the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool understandability score average was 92.10 ± 9.03, and the actionability score average was 81.60 ± 18.47. The Global Quality Scale score average, which evaluates the suitability and quality of the content of the AI-supported educational material, was found to be 4.10 ± 0.87.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At the end of the study, it was determined that the educational material was reasonable regarding understandability and actionability. The Turkish readability level was also reasonable and easily understandable.</p><p><strong>Implication for the profession: </strong>This study is one of the proactive attempts to use AI in preparing educational materials for nurses and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public contribution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understandability and Actionability of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Lymphedema Education Material in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery: Expert Evaluation.
Aims: To evaluate the artificial intelligence-assisted lymphedema education material in patients undergoing breast cancer surgery.
Design: A comprehensive, successful methodological design was used to evaluate the portability of the expandable, AI-supported lymphedema education material for breast cancer. The study was reported in accordance with the STROBE statement (see Data S1 for the completed STROBE [Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology] checklist). When preparing the AI-supported lymphedema education material managed with breast cancer treatment, it is first determined in the education of patients. Then, the commands of the Chat GBT-4 program are included in the scope of the transferred education content. For the created education content, readability was first evaluated and expert opinion was taken for the final version of the draft.
Methods: While preparing the AI-assisted lymphedema education material in the study, expert opinions were obtained, and the educational needs of the patients were determined by scanning the literature. Then, 12 commands were given in the ChatGPT-4 program to create the educational content. Formulas were used to evaluate the readability of the created educational content in Turkish and the readability of the health literature. The validity of the lymphedema education material was presented to 10 experts. The experts evaluated the understandability and actionability of the educational material using the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool and the Global Quality Scale, which evaluates the quality of the educational material.
Results: It was concluded that the readability index of the lymphedema education material for Turkish was 67.3, and the Turkish readability level was 'easily understandable'. The readability index of health literature was found to be 11.28, 9.68, 10.58, 39.0, and 11.26, respectively. When the internal consistency coefficient between the experts was examined, it was found to be 0.74. It was determined that the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool understandability score average was 92.10 ± 9.03, and the actionability score average was 81.60 ± 18.47. The Global Quality Scale score average, which evaluates the suitability and quality of the content of the AI-supported educational material, was found to be 4.10 ± 0.87.
Conclusion: At the end of the study, it was determined that the educational material was reasonable regarding understandability and actionability. The Turkish readability level was also reasonable and easily understandable.
Implication for the profession: This study is one of the proactive attempts to use AI in preparing educational materials for nurses and healthcare professionals.
Patient or public contribution: No patient or public contribution.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
