曾经吸烟和目前吸烟的癌症幸存者对戒烟的看法-一项质性研究。

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2025-10-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X251355531
Frederike Bokemeyer, Johanna Springorum, Lisa Lebherz, Carsten Bokemeyer, Holger Schulz, Kathleen Gali, Christiane Bleich, Paulina Kiefer, Sven Püffel, Janina Freitag
{"title":"曾经吸烟和目前吸烟的癌症幸存者对戒烟的看法-一项质性研究。","authors":"Frederike Bokemeyer, Johanna Springorum, Lisa Lebherz, Carsten Bokemeyer, Holger Schulz, Kathleen Gali, Christiane Bleich, Paulina Kiefer, Sven Püffel, Janina Freitag","doi":"10.1177/1179173X251355531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drastic life events, such as a cancer diagnosis, do not necessarily lead to a reduction in unhealthy and dysfunctional behaviors like smoking. Continued smoking among cancer survivors significantly increases the risk of recurrence and worsens treatment outcomes. While evidence-based smoking cessation treatments have demonstrated their effectiveness in acute cancer care, their impact among long-term cancer survivors remains limited, and overall quit rates remain low. To cessation outcome and improve long-term support strategies, it is essential to better understand the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers of both current and former smoking cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with six cancer survivors (50% female), aged 34 to 81 years, with different cancer types (breast, skin, lung, urinary bladder cancer, and GIST). At the time of the interview, three participants were still smoking, two had quit at the time of their diagnosis, and one had quit beforehand. All had completed cancer treatment at least four years prior without relapse. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, applying an inductive approach to identify recurring themes and categorize the data using computer-assisted analysis software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main categories emerged from the interviews: (1) motivations for quitting, (2) perceived barriers, (3) facilitators of cessation, and (4) contextual influences.Key motives for continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis included managing nicotine cravings and stress, experiencing pleasure and boredom relief, and a perceived lack of negative health consequences. Some participants reported smoking to cope with treatment-related discomfort. A general lack of knowledge regarding the link between smoking and cancer contributed to low motivation to quit and limited risk awareness. Participants who had successfully quit cited improvements in health and well-being as primary reasons for cessation, alongside external factors such as financial savings and the aversion to cigarette odor. Medical advice and support from healthcare providers were mentioned frequently - both as motivating factors and, in cases where such support was absent or discouraging, as barriers.Barriers to quitting included a persistent smoking environment, negative emotions during cessation attempts, poor timing related to the cancer experience, and previous failed quit attempts.Conversely, facilitators of cessation included external regulations (eg, smoking bans, legal restrictions), a tobacco-free environment, strong internal motivation, individual coping strategies for withdrawal symptoms and craving, medical recommendations, and support from family or peers.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The results highlight the need for a better adaptation of smoking cessation interventions to the specific needs of cancer survivors. This has significant implications for oncology professionals and healthcare providers in cancer care. The inconsistency in smoking cessation advice from healthcare providers, ranging from discouragement to strong encouragement, points to the necessity of re-evaluating current policies and establishing more standardized communication within oncology settings. Cancer survivors require improved education about the health risks associated with continued smoking, as well as information about available cessation aids and pharmacological support options. The \"teachable moment\" following a cancer diagnosis presents an opportunity to integrate smoking cessation support into routine oncological care. Practical strategies for cancer survivors who wish to quit include the development of alternative behaviors, effective stress management techniques, and further enhancement of legal restrictions to promote a smoke-free environment. Such measures would not only support individual cessation efforts but also contribute to broader public health goals, protecting cancer survivors and the general population from smoking-related harm. The insights from this study provide a foundation for the development of more tailored cessation interventions for cancer survivors.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":"18 ","pages":"1179173X251355531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511738/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formerly Smoking and Currently Smoking Cancer Survivors' View on Smoking Cessation - A Qualitative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Frederike Bokemeyer, Johanna Springorum, Lisa Lebherz, Carsten Bokemeyer, Holger Schulz, Kathleen Gali, Christiane Bleich, Paulina Kiefer, Sven Püffel, Janina Freitag\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1179173X251355531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drastic life events, such as a cancer diagnosis, do not necessarily lead to a reduction in unhealthy and dysfunctional behaviors like smoking. Continued smoking among cancer survivors significantly increases the risk of recurrence and worsens treatment outcomes. While evidence-based smoking cessation treatments have demonstrated their effectiveness in acute cancer care, their impact among long-term cancer survivors remains limited, and overall quit rates remain low. To cessation outcome and improve long-term support strategies, it is essential to better understand the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers of both current and former smoking cancer survivors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with six cancer survivors (50% female), aged 34 to 81 years, with different cancer types (breast, skin, lung, urinary bladder cancer, and GIST). At the time of the interview, three participants were still smoking, two had quit at the time of their diagnosis, and one had quit beforehand. All had completed cancer treatment at least four years prior without relapse. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, applying an inductive approach to identify recurring themes and categorize the data using computer-assisted analysis software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four main categories emerged from the interviews: (1) motivations for quitting, (2) perceived barriers, (3) facilitators of cessation, and (4) contextual influences.Key motives for continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis included managing nicotine cravings and stress, experiencing pleasure and boredom relief, and a perceived lack of negative health consequences. Some participants reported smoking to cope with treatment-related discomfort. A general lack of knowledge regarding the link between smoking and cancer contributed to low motivation to quit and limited risk awareness. Participants who had successfully quit cited improvements in health and well-being as primary reasons for cessation, alongside external factors such as financial savings and the aversion to cigarette odor. Medical advice and support from healthcare providers were mentioned frequently - both as motivating factors and, in cases where such support was absent or discouraging, as barriers.Barriers to quitting included a persistent smoking environment, negative emotions during cessation attempts, poor timing related to the cancer experience, and previous failed quit attempts.Conversely, facilitators of cessation included external regulations (eg, smoking bans, legal restrictions), a tobacco-free environment, strong internal motivation, individual coping strategies for withdrawal symptoms and craving, medical recommendations, and support from family or peers.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>The results highlight the need for a better adaptation of smoking cessation interventions to the specific needs of cancer survivors. This has significant implications for oncology professionals and healthcare providers in cancer care. The inconsistency in smoking cessation advice from healthcare providers, ranging from discouragement to strong encouragement, points to the necessity of re-evaluating current policies and establishing more standardized communication within oncology settings. Cancer survivors require improved education about the health risks associated with continued smoking, as well as information about available cessation aids and pharmacological support options. The \\\"teachable moment\\\" following a cancer diagnosis presents an opportunity to integrate smoking cessation support into routine oncological care. Practical strategies for cancer survivors who wish to quit include the development of alternative behaviors, effective stress management techniques, and further enhancement of legal restrictions to promote a smoke-free environment. Such measures would not only support individual cessation efforts but also contribute to broader public health goals, protecting cancer survivors and the general population from smoking-related harm. The insights from this study provide a foundation for the development of more tailored cessation interventions for cancer survivors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"1179173X251355531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12511738/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tobacco Use Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X251355531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X251355531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:剧烈的生活事件,如癌症诊断,并不一定会导致吸烟等不健康和功能失调行为的减少。癌症幸存者继续吸烟会显著增加复发的风险,并使治疗结果恶化。虽然基于证据的戒烟治疗在急性癌症治疗中证明了它们的有效性,但它们对长期癌症幸存者的影响仍然有限,总体戒烟率仍然很低。为了戒烟效果和改善长期支持策略,必须更好地了解当前和以前的吸烟癌症幸存者的经历、态度和感知障碍。材料和方法:本定性研究包括对6名癌症幸存者(50%为女性)进行半结构化访谈,年龄34 - 81岁,患有不同类型的癌症(乳腺癌、皮肤癌、肺癌、膀胱癌和GIST)。在接受采访时,3名参与者仍在吸烟,2名在诊断时已经戒烟,1名在诊断前已经戒烟。所有患者都至少在4年前完成了癌症治疗,没有复发。访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用定性内容分析进行分析,应用归纳方法来识别反复出现的主题,并使用计算机辅助分析软件对数据进行分类。结果:访谈中出现了四个主要类别:(1)戒烟动机,(2)感知障碍,(3)戒烟促进者,(4)环境影响。癌症诊断后继续吸烟的主要动机包括控制对尼古丁的渴望和压力,体验愉悦和无聊的缓解,以及认为没有负面健康后果。一些参与者报告说,吸烟是为了应对治疗相关的不适。普遍缺乏关于吸烟和癌症之间联系的知识,导致戒烟动机低,风险意识有限。成功戒烟的参与者表示,健康和幸福感的改善是戒烟的主要原因,此外还有经济节省和对香烟气味的厌恶等外部因素。经常提到医疗保健提供者的医疗咨询和支持——既是激励因素,在没有这种支持或令人沮丧的情况下,则是障碍。戒烟的障碍包括持续吸烟的环境,戒烟过程中的负面情绪,与癌症经历相关的不良时机,以及以前失败的戒烟尝试。相反,促进戒烟的因素包括外部法规(如禁烟、法律限制)、无烟环境、强烈的内在动机、个人应对戒断症状和渴望的策略、医疗建议以及家庭或同伴的支持。讨论/结论:结果强调需要更好地适应戒烟干预措施,以适应癌症幸存者的具体需求。这对肿瘤专业人员和癌症护理保健提供者具有重要意义。卫生保健提供者的戒烟建议不一致,从劝阻到强烈鼓励,表明有必要重新评估当前政策,并在肿瘤学环境中建立更标准化的沟通。癌症幸存者需要更好地了解与继续吸烟相关的健康风险,以及有关现有戒烟辅助工具和药物支持选择的信息。癌症诊断后的“教育时刻”提供了将戒烟支持纳入常规肿瘤护理的机会。对于希望戒烟的癌症幸存者来说,实用的策略包括发展替代行为,有效的压力管理技术,以及进一步加强法律限制以促进无烟环境。这些措施不仅支持个人戒烟努力,而且有助于实现更广泛的公共卫生目标,保护癌症幸存者和一般人群免受与吸烟有关的伤害。这项研究的见解为为癌症幸存者制定更有针对性的戒烟干预措施提供了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formerly Smoking and Currently Smoking Cancer Survivors' View on Smoking Cessation - A Qualitative Study.

Background: Drastic life events, such as a cancer diagnosis, do not necessarily lead to a reduction in unhealthy and dysfunctional behaviors like smoking. Continued smoking among cancer survivors significantly increases the risk of recurrence and worsens treatment outcomes. While evidence-based smoking cessation treatments have demonstrated their effectiveness in acute cancer care, their impact among long-term cancer survivors remains limited, and overall quit rates remain low. To cessation outcome and improve long-term support strategies, it is essential to better understand the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers of both current and former smoking cancer survivors.

Materials and methods: This qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with six cancer survivors (50% female), aged 34 to 81 years, with different cancer types (breast, skin, lung, urinary bladder cancer, and GIST). At the time of the interview, three participants were still smoking, two had quit at the time of their diagnosis, and one had quit beforehand. All had completed cancer treatment at least four years prior without relapse. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, applying an inductive approach to identify recurring themes and categorize the data using computer-assisted analysis software.

Results: Four main categories emerged from the interviews: (1) motivations for quitting, (2) perceived barriers, (3) facilitators of cessation, and (4) contextual influences.Key motives for continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis included managing nicotine cravings and stress, experiencing pleasure and boredom relief, and a perceived lack of negative health consequences. Some participants reported smoking to cope with treatment-related discomfort. A general lack of knowledge regarding the link between smoking and cancer contributed to low motivation to quit and limited risk awareness. Participants who had successfully quit cited improvements in health and well-being as primary reasons for cessation, alongside external factors such as financial savings and the aversion to cigarette odor. Medical advice and support from healthcare providers were mentioned frequently - both as motivating factors and, in cases where such support was absent or discouraging, as barriers.Barriers to quitting included a persistent smoking environment, negative emotions during cessation attempts, poor timing related to the cancer experience, and previous failed quit attempts.Conversely, facilitators of cessation included external regulations (eg, smoking bans, legal restrictions), a tobacco-free environment, strong internal motivation, individual coping strategies for withdrawal symptoms and craving, medical recommendations, and support from family or peers.

Discussion/conclusion: The results highlight the need for a better adaptation of smoking cessation interventions to the specific needs of cancer survivors. This has significant implications for oncology professionals and healthcare providers in cancer care. The inconsistency in smoking cessation advice from healthcare providers, ranging from discouragement to strong encouragement, points to the necessity of re-evaluating current policies and establishing more standardized communication within oncology settings. Cancer survivors require improved education about the health risks associated with continued smoking, as well as information about available cessation aids and pharmacological support options. The "teachable moment" following a cancer diagnosis presents an opportunity to integrate smoking cessation support into routine oncological care. Practical strategies for cancer survivors who wish to quit include the development of alternative behaviors, effective stress management techniques, and further enhancement of legal restrictions to promote a smoke-free environment. Such measures would not only support individual cessation efforts but also contribute to broader public health goals, protecting cancer survivors and the general population from smoking-related harm. The insights from this study provide a foundation for the development of more tailored cessation interventions for cancer survivors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信