6个月等待政策对肝细胞癌患者移植、切除和消融结果的影响:一项国家癌症数据库分析

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Bima J Hasjim, Mitchell Paukner, Allison J Kwong, Mamatha Bhat, Hirohito Ichii, Robert R Redfield, Oliver S Eng, Zeljka Jutric, David K Imagawa, Reed I Ayabe
{"title":"6个月等待政策对肝细胞癌患者移植、切除和消融结果的影响:一项国家癌症数据库分析","authors":"Bima J Hasjim, Mitchell Paukner, Allison J Kwong, Mamatha Bhat, Hirohito Ichii, Robert R Redfield, Oliver S Eng, Zeljka Jutric, David K Imagawa, Reed I Ayabe","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era (P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bima J Hasjim, Mitchell Paukner, Allison J Kwong, Mamatha Bhat, Hirohito Ichii, Robert R Redfield, Oliver S Eng, Zeljka Jutric, David K Imagawa, Reed I Ayabe\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/TP.0000000000005536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era (P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality (P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005536\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2015年实施的针对等待原位肝移植(OLT)的早期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者终末期肝病异常点累积模型的强制性6个月等待期与预后改善相关。然而,这些发现大多依赖于已经获得OLT等待名单的队列,并且该政策对非OLT治疗策略(例如肝切除术,消融术)的影响仍然知之甚少。方法:对2010年至2021年国家癌症数据库中早期HCC (T2N0M0)患者进行回顾性分析。政策前/政策后时代分别以2015年之前或之后的HCC诊断来定义。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier生存法和多变量Cox比例风险回归。结果:53 928例患者中,OLT发生率下降(13.1% ~ 7.4%),消融增加(19.1% ~ 25.3%),切除保持不变(9.2% vs 9.2%) (P < 0.05)。结论:总体而言,后政策时代与早期HCC预后改善相关。虽然在不同的政策时期,OLT或消融的生存结果相似,但肝切除术对生存的改善最大,并且仍然是早期HCC的持久治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of the 6-mo Wait Policy on Transplantation, Resection, and Ablation Outcomes for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Background: The mandatory 6-mo waiting period implemented in 2015 for accruing model for end-stage liver disease exception points in patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) awaiting orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) has been associated with improved outcomes. However, most of these findings are dependent on cohorts who have had access to the OLT waitlist, and the policy's impact on non-OLT treatment strategies (eg, liver resection, ablation) remains poorly understood.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients with early-stage HCC (T2N0M0) from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2021. The pre-/post-policy era was defined by HCC diagnosis before or after 2015, respectively. The Kaplan-Meier survival method and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression were used to estimate survival.

Results: Among 53 928 patients, rates of OLT decreased (13.1%-7.4%), ablation increased (19.1%-25.3%), and resection remained constant (9.2% versus 9.2%) from the pre- to post-policy era (P < 0.001 for all). OLT was associated with the highest 5-y postoperative survival (79.7%), followed by resection (63.5%) and ablation (42.9%; P < 0.001, all pairwise comparisons). Overall survival improved in the post-policy era (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.92), with resection having the greatest improvement in survival (hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.77). Among all treatment modalities, time-to-intervention was not a predictor of mortality (P > 0.05).

Conclusions: Overall, the post-policy era was associated with improved outcomes in early-stage HCC. While survival outcomes between policy eras were similar for OLT or ablation, liver resection was shown to have the highest improvement in survival and remains a durable treatment option in early-stage HCC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信