根据毒理学关注阈值、起始点和安全消费历史估计化妆品中沙棘果提取物的安全使用水平。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim
{"title":"根据毒理学关注阈值、起始点和安全消费历史估计化妆品中沙棘果提取物的安全使用水平。","authors":"Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105961"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Usage Levels of Aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides Fruit Extract in Cosmetics Estimated by Threshold of Toxicological Concern, Point of Departure, and History of Safe Consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物性成分由于其复杂多变的组成,给化妆品安全性评估带来了挑战。我们使用毒理学关注阈值(TTC)、起始点(PoD)估计和安全消费方法的历史来估计水基沙棘果提取物(HRFE)在化妆品中的安全使用水平。首先通过体外实验排除HRFE对皮肤和眼睛的刺激及遗传毒性。采用TTC法,鉴定出占HRFE质量98.46%的85种成分,并计算出全身暴露剂量水平,估算出HRFE的安全使用水平。此外,还利用啮齿类动物90天口服重复剂量毒性研究和沙棘果安全食用史中的PoD,得出了HRFE在化妆品中的安全使用水平。以TTC、PoD和安全食用史方法估计HRFE的最大安全用量分别为0.125 mg/kg bw/day(提取粉)、0.5 mg/kg bw/day和166 mg/kg bw/day,表明TTC最保守,安全食用史最少。然而,材料等效和路线差异的问题仍然存在于PoD和安全消费的历史。总的来说,这项研究可能有助于了解目前植物成分安全性评估方法的优缺点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safe Usage Levels of Aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides Fruit Extract in Cosmetics Estimated by Threshold of Toxicological Concern, Point of Departure, and History of Safe Consumption.

Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.80%
发文量
147
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health. Types of peer-reviewed articles published: -Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to: 1.Factors influencing human sensitivity 2.Exposure science related to risk assessment 3.Alternative toxicological test methods 4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations 5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies 6.Read-across methods and evaluations -Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues -Letters to the Editor -Guest Editorials (by Invitation)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信