Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim
{"title":"根据毒理学关注阈值、起始点和安全消费历史估计化妆品中沙棘果提取物的安全使用水平。","authors":"Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim","doi":"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20852,"journal":{"name":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"105961"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safe Usage Levels of Aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides Fruit Extract in Cosmetics Estimated by Threshold of Toxicological Concern, Point of Departure, and History of Safe Consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Hyejeon Cho, Ye Ji Koo, Seung Ha Lee, Seungjin Bae, Jaeyun Choi, Kyung-Min Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105961\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2025.105961","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safe Usage Levels of Aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides Fruit Extract in Cosmetics Estimated by Threshold of Toxicological Concern, Point of Departure, and History of Safe Consumption.
Botanical ingredients pose challenges to cosmetic safety assessors due to complex and variable composition. We estimated the safe usage levels of aqueous Hippophae rhamnoides fruit extract (HRFE) in cosmetics using Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC), Point of Departure (PoD) estimation, and history of safe consumption approaches. Skin and eye irritation and genotoxicity of HRFE were excluded through in vitro tests, first. The safe usage level of HRFE was estimated using TTC approach through identifying 85 constituents accounting for 98.46% of HRFE on mass basis, and calculating systemic exposure dosage levels. PoD from the rodent 90-day oral repeated-dose toxicity study and history of safe food consumption of Hippophae rhamnoides fruit were also utilized to derive safe usage levels of HRFE in cosmetics. Maximum safe usage levels of HRFE were estimated to be 0.125 mg/kg bw/day (extract powder), 0.5 mg/kg bw/day, and 166 mg/kg bw/day with TTC, PoD and history of safe consumption approach respectively, showing that TTC is the most conservative and history of safe consumption, the least. However, questions of material equivalence and route-difference remained for PoD and history of safe consumption. Collectively, this study may help to understand the pros and cons of current safety assessment methodologies for botanical ingredients.
期刊介绍:
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology publishes peer reviewed articles that involve the generation, evaluation, and interpretation of experimental animal and human data that are of direct importance and relevance for regulatory authorities with respect to toxicological and pharmacological regulations in society. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve the protection of human health and environment. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of toxicological and pharmacological compounds on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of human and environmental health.
Types of peer-reviewed articles published:
-Original research articles of relevance for regulatory aspects covering aspects including, but not limited to:
1.Factors influencing human sensitivity
2.Exposure science related to risk assessment
3.Alternative toxicological test methods
4.Frameworks for evaluation and integration of data in regulatory evaluations
5.Harmonization across regulatory agencies
6.Read-across methods and evaluations
-Contemporary Reviews on policy related Research issues
-Letters to the Editor
-Guest Editorials (by Invitation)