稳定和不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败后人工髋关节置换术的疗效及并发症。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Juncheng Li, Canhong Zhang, Lan Lin, Nanxin Zhang, Jiexin Huang, Zida Huang, Huangfeng Lin, Hongxiang Wei, Haiqi Ding, Shaopeng Lin, Wenming Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Jiagu Huang
{"title":"稳定和不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败后人工髋关节置换术的疗效及并发症。","authors":"Juncheng Li, Canhong Zhang, Lan Lin, Nanxin Zhang, Jiexin Huang, Zida Huang, Huangfeng Lin, Hongxiang Wei, Haiqi Ding, Shaopeng Lin, Wenming Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Jiagu Huang","doi":"10.1111/os.70184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conversion to hip arthroplasty (cHA) is a widely utilized and effective surgical intervention for addressing the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures (FIF-INF). Although previous studies have confirmed that the failure rate of internal fixation is higher in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but whether the efficacy and complications of cHA after failure differ from those in stable fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications associated with hip arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the failure of internal fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hip arthroplasty subsequent to the failure of FIF-INF from December 2012 to December 2020 at various participating research centers. Cases demonstrating excellent and acceptable quality fracture reduction, as defined by the criteria established by Chang et al., were included. According to AO/OTA classification criteria of intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures were classified into stable fractures (31-A1) and unstable fractures (31-A2, A3). There were 47 patients with stable fractures and 56 patients with unstable fractures. Clinical and radiological evaluations were conducted for all patients. This study employed independent samples t-tests, χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Fisher's exact test, and both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were analyzed. The HHS in the stable group improved from a preoperative mean of 47.08 ± 5.50 to 89.13 ± 4.75 at the final follow-up, whereas that in the unstable group increased from 45.43 ± 6.36 to 83.87 ± 4.67. The improvement scores for the stable and unstable groups were 42.05 ± 4.69 and 38.81 ± 3.06, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). VAS scores decreased from the preoperative levels of 7.13 ± 0.92 and 7.61 ± 0.82 to 2.36 ± 0.87 and 2.91 ± 0.79, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in pain in both groups; however, the unstable group reported more severe postoperative pain (p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications following cHA was significantly greater in the unstable group (28.57%) than in the stable group (10.64%) (p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cHA is an effective treatment modality for the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Compared with stable fractures, patients with initial unstable fractures that have failed experience a greater incidence of postoperative complications, relatively poorer joint function, and more pronounced pain following cHA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects and Complications of Hip Arthroplasty After Failure of Internal Fixation in Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Juncheng Li, Canhong Zhang, Lan Lin, Nanxin Zhang, Jiexin Huang, Zida Huang, Huangfeng Lin, Hongxiang Wei, Haiqi Ding, Shaopeng Lin, Wenming Zhang, Xinyu Fang, Jiagu Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Conversion to hip arthroplasty (cHA) is a widely utilized and effective surgical intervention for addressing the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures (FIF-INF). Although previous studies have confirmed that the failure rate of internal fixation is higher in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but whether the efficacy and complications of cHA after failure differ from those in stable fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications associated with hip arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the failure of internal fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hip arthroplasty subsequent to the failure of FIF-INF from December 2012 to December 2020 at various participating research centers. Cases demonstrating excellent and acceptable quality fracture reduction, as defined by the criteria established by Chang et al., were included. According to AO/OTA classification criteria of intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures were classified into stable fractures (31-A1) and unstable fractures (31-A2, A3). There were 47 patients with stable fractures and 56 patients with unstable fractures. Clinical and radiological evaluations were conducted for all patients. This study employed independent samples t-tests, χ<sup>2</sup> tests or Fisher's exact test, and both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 103 patients were analyzed. The HHS in the stable group improved from a preoperative mean of 47.08 ± 5.50 to 89.13 ± 4.75 at the final follow-up, whereas that in the unstable group increased from 45.43 ± 6.36 to 83.87 ± 4.67. The improvement scores for the stable and unstable groups were 42.05 ± 4.69 and 38.81 ± 3.06, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). VAS scores decreased from the preoperative levels of 7.13 ± 0.92 and 7.61 ± 0.82 to 2.36 ± 0.87 and 2.91 ± 0.79, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in pain in both groups; however, the unstable group reported more severe postoperative pain (p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications following cHA was significantly greater in the unstable group (28.57%) than in the stable group (10.64%) (p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>cHA is an effective treatment modality for the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Compared with stable fractures, patients with initial unstable fractures that have failed experience a greater incidence of postoperative complications, relatively poorer joint function, and more pronounced pain following cHA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70184\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70184","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:转髋关节置换术(cHA)是解决股骨粗隆间骨折(FIF-INF)内固定失败的一种广泛应用且有效的手术干预措施。虽然已有研究证实不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败率较高,但失败后cHA的疗效及并发症是否与稳定骨折不同尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估和比较稳定性和不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败后至少3年的临床和影像学结果,以及与髋关节置换术相关的并发症发生率。方法:这项多中心研究回顾性分析了2012年12月至2020年12月各参与研究中心因FIF-INF失败而接受髋关节置换术的患者。根据Chang等人建立的标准,纳入了表现出优异和可接受的骨折复位质量的病例。根据AO/OTA粗隆间骨折分型标准,将骨折分为稳定型骨折(31-A1)和不稳定型骨折(31-A2, A3)。稳定性骨折47例,不稳定骨折56例。对所有患者进行临床和放射学评估。本研究采用独立样本t检验、χ2检验或Fisher精确检验,单因素和多因素logistic回归分析。结果:共分析103例患者。稳定组HHS由术前平均47.08±5.50上升至89.13±4.75,不稳定组HHS由45.43±6.36上升至83.87±4.67。稳定组和不稳定组的改善评分分别为42.05±4.69分和38.81±3.06分,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:cHA是股骨粗隆间骨折内固定失败的有效治疗方式。与稳定骨折相比,初始不稳定骨折失败的患者术后并发症发生率更高,关节功能相对较差,cHA后疼痛更明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects and Complications of Hip Arthroplasty After Failure of Internal Fixation in Stable and Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures.

Objective: Conversion to hip arthroplasty (cHA) is a widely utilized and effective surgical intervention for addressing the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures (FIF-INF). Although previous studies have confirmed that the failure rate of internal fixation is higher in unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures, but whether the efficacy and complications of cHA after failure differ from those in stable fractures remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as the incidence of complications associated with hip arthroplasty over a minimum follow-up period of 3 years after the failure of internal fixation in both stable and unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures.

Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent hip arthroplasty subsequent to the failure of FIF-INF from December 2012 to December 2020 at various participating research centers. Cases demonstrating excellent and acceptable quality fracture reduction, as defined by the criteria established by Chang et al., were included. According to AO/OTA classification criteria of intertrochanteric fractures, the fractures were classified into stable fractures (31-A1) and unstable fractures (31-A2, A3). There were 47 patients with stable fractures and 56 patients with unstable fractures. Clinical and radiological evaluations were conducted for all patients. This study employed independent samples t-tests, χ2 tests or Fisher's exact test, and both univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.

Results: A total of 103 patients were analyzed. The HHS in the stable group improved from a preoperative mean of 47.08 ± 5.50 to 89.13 ± 4.75 at the final follow-up, whereas that in the unstable group increased from 45.43 ± 6.36 to 83.87 ± 4.67. The improvement scores for the stable and unstable groups were 42.05 ± 4.69 and 38.81 ± 3.06, respectively, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001). VAS scores decreased from the preoperative levels of 7.13 ± 0.92 and 7.61 ± 0.82 to 2.36 ± 0.87 and 2.91 ± 0.79, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in pain in both groups; however, the unstable group reported more severe postoperative pain (p = 0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications following cHA was significantly greater in the unstable group (28.57%) than in the stable group (10.64%) (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: cHA is an effective treatment modality for the failure of internal fixation in intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Compared with stable fractures, patients with initial unstable fractures that have failed experience a greater incidence of postoperative complications, relatively poorer joint function, and more pronounced pain following cHA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信