数字健康背景下中国老年人的技术恐惧症水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Zhehui Yang, Hong Yan, Shijin Wang, Yuling Luo, Yan Liu, Yuanyuan Tang, Tingting Zhang
{"title":"数字健康背景下中国老年人的技术恐惧症水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Zhehui Yang, Hong Yan, Shijin Wang, Yuling Luo, Yan Liu, Yuanyuan Tang, Tingting Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the level of technophobia among Chinese older adults in digital health and compare it with global studies to identify characteristics and differences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Chinese adults aged 60 and older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a computer-based search in 12 databases for cross-sectional studies using the Chinese Version of the Technophobia Scale (TS-CN) that reported technophobia levels among older adults in China, covering publications from the inception until August 5, 2025. Literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment of included studies were independently completed by 2 researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 15 papers with a total of 7452 participants. The pooled mean total score of technophobia among older adults in China was 37.25 (95% CI, 35.82-38.68). The pooled mean item scores for techno-anxiety, techno-paranoia, and privacy concerns dimensions were 2.87 (95% CI, 2.68-3.05), 2.82 (95% CI, 2.51-3.12), and 2.98 (95% CI, 2.73-3.23), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant differences in technophobia levels among older adults in China based on different age, education level, average monthly personal income, and residence place (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>In China, technophobia among older adults is moderate, particularly concerning privacy concerns dimensions. Higher technophobia levels are observed in those who are older, have lower education and income, and live in rural areas. This trend is global amid aging and digitalization. Health care professionals and policymakers should identify high-risk groups and risk factors, developing targeted interventions through multidisciplinary collaboration to reduce technophobia, offering a Chinese perspective for international exchange.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105919"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Level of Technophobia Among Older Adults in China in the Context of Digital Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhehui Yang, Hong Yan, Shijin Wang, Yuling Luo, Yan Liu, Yuanyuan Tang, Tingting Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To systematically review the level of technophobia among Chinese older adults in digital health and compare it with global studies to identify characteristics and differences.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Chinese adults aged 60 and older.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a computer-based search in 12 databases for cross-sectional studies using the Chinese Version of the Technophobia Scale (TS-CN) that reported technophobia levels among older adults in China, covering publications from the inception until August 5, 2025. Literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment of included studies were independently completed by 2 researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 15 papers with a total of 7452 participants. The pooled mean total score of technophobia among older adults in China was 37.25 (95% CI, 35.82-38.68). The pooled mean item scores for techno-anxiety, techno-paranoia, and privacy concerns dimensions were 2.87 (95% CI, 2.68-3.05), 2.82 (95% CI, 2.51-3.12), and 2.98 (95% CI, 2.73-3.23), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant differences in technophobia levels among older adults in China based on different age, education level, average monthly personal income, and residence place (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>In China, technophobia among older adults is moderate, particularly concerning privacy concerns dimensions. Higher technophobia levels are observed in those who are older, have lower education and income, and live in rural areas. This trend is global amid aging and digitalization. Health care professionals and policymakers should identify high-risk groups and risk factors, developing targeted interventions through multidisciplinary collaboration to reduce technophobia, offering a Chinese perspective for international exchange.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105919\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105919\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105919","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统回顾中国老年人在数字健康中的技术恐惧水平,并将其与全球研究进行比较,以确定特征和差异。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。设置和参与者:60岁及以上的中国成年人。方法:我们在12个数据库中进行了基于计算机的搜索,使用中国版技术恐惧症量表(TS-CN)进行横断面研究,这些研究报告了中国老年人的技术恐惧症水平,涵盖了从开始到2025年8月5日的出版物。纳入研究的文献筛选、资料提取和偏倚风险评估由2名研究者独立完成。采用Stata 15.0软件进行meta分析。结果:纳入文献15篇,共纳入受试者7452人。中国老年人技术恐惧症的综合平均总分为37.25分(95% CI, 35.82-38.68)。技术焦虑、技术偏执和隐私关注维度的综合平均项目得分分别为2.87 (95% CI, 2.68-3.05)、2.82 (95% CI, 2.51-3.12)和2.98 (95% CI, 2.73-3.23)。亚组分析显示,不同年龄、受教育程度、个人月平均收入、居住地的中国老年人科技恐惧症水平差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论与启示:在中国,老年人的技术恐惧症是中度的,尤其是在隐私担忧方面。在那些年龄较大、受教育程度和收入较低、生活在农村地区的人群中,技术恐惧症水平较高。在老龄化和数字化的背景下,这一趋势是全球性的。卫生保健专业人员和政策制定者应确定高危人群和风险因素,通过多学科合作制定有针对性的干预措施,以减少技术恐惧症,为国际交流提供中国视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Level of Technophobia Among Older Adults in China in the Context of Digital Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To systematically review the level of technophobia among Chinese older adults in digital health and compare it with global studies to identify characteristics and differences.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting and participants: Chinese adults aged 60 and older.

Methods: We conducted a computer-based search in 12 databases for cross-sectional studies using the Chinese Version of the Technophobia Scale (TS-CN) that reported technophobia levels among older adults in China, covering publications from the inception until August 5, 2025. Literature screening, data extraction, and bias risk assessment of included studies were independently completed by 2 researchers. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0 software.

Results: The study included 15 papers with a total of 7452 participants. The pooled mean total score of technophobia among older adults in China was 37.25 (95% CI, 35.82-38.68). The pooled mean item scores for techno-anxiety, techno-paranoia, and privacy concerns dimensions were 2.87 (95% CI, 2.68-3.05), 2.82 (95% CI, 2.51-3.12), and 2.98 (95% CI, 2.73-3.23), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed statistically significant differences in technophobia levels among older adults in China based on different age, education level, average monthly personal income, and residence place (P < .05).

Conclusions and implications: In China, technophobia among older adults is moderate, particularly concerning privacy concerns dimensions. Higher technophobia levels are observed in those who are older, have lower education and income, and live in rural areas. This trend is global amid aging and digitalization. Health care professionals and policymakers should identify high-risk groups and risk factors, developing targeted interventions through multidisciplinary collaboration to reduce technophobia, offering a Chinese perspective for international exchange.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信