组织系统病理学检查预测Barrett食管患者进展风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham
{"title":"组织系统病理学检查预测Barrett食管患者进展风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tissue Systems Pathology Test Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对已发表的临床有效性研究进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估TSP-9测试的预测性能。背景:鉴别巴雷特食管(BE)患者是否会发展为高级别发育不良(HGD)或食管腺癌(EAC)是具有挑战性的。组织系统病理学(TSP-9)检测可以预测BE患者进展为HGD/EAC的风险。研究:在数据库中检索评估TSP-9临床有效性的研究,提取描述进展者、非进展者、TSP-9结果和95%可信区间(ci)的风险比(HR)的数据。计算优势比(OR)、敏感性、特异性和经患病率调整的阳性和阴性预测值(PPVadj/NPVadj),并将其用于荟萃分析。结果:6项研究符合入选标准,包括699例患者。TSP-9的or和hr的平均共同效应值估计为6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66)。结论:TSP-9性能的效应估计表明该测试为BE患者提供了风险分层。TSP-9检测可提供具有临床影响的结果,使对高风险患者的护理升级或识别可通过常规监测安全管理的低风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Tissue Systems Pathology Test Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Goals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.

Background: Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.

Study: Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.

Results: Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).

Conclusions: Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信