Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham
{"title":"组织系统病理学检查预测Barrett食管患者进展风险:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Tissue Systems Pathology Test Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Caitlin C Houghton, Ivo Ditah, Cadman L Leggett, Amrit K Kamboj, Luke Putnam, Sarah L Sokol-Borrelli, John C Lipham\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Goals: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.</p><p><strong>Study: </strong>Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of clinical gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Tissue Systems Pathology Test Predicts Risk of Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Goals: A systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical validity studies was conducted to evaluate the predictive performance of the TSP-9 test.
Background: Identifying patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) who will progress to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is challenging. The tissue systems pathology (TSP-9) test can predict risk of progression to HGD/EAC in BE patients.
Study: Databases were searched for studies that assessed the clinical validity of TSP-9, and data describing progressors, non-progressors, TSP-9 results, and hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted. Odds ratios (OR), sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence-adjusted positive and negative predictive values (PPVadj/NPVadj) were calculated and used for meta-analysis.
Results: Six studies met eligibility criteria, comprising 699 patients. ORs and HRs for TSP-9 had mean common effect size estimates of 6.52 (95% CI: 4.40-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=33%) and 6.66 (95% CI: 4.59-9.66, P<0.0001, I2=0%), respectively, for predicting progression to HGD/EAC. Mean common effect size estimates were 61% (95% CI: 54%-68%) for sensitivity, 81% (95% CI: 78%-84%) for specificity, 28% (95% CI: 17%-42%) for PPVadj (high risk), 14% (95% CI: 9%-21%) for PPVadj (high/int risk), and 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) for NPVadj with minimal inter-study heterogeneity (I2=79%, 21%, 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively).
Conclusions: Effect estimates of TSP-9 performance demonstrate that the test provides risk stratification for BE patients. The TSP-9 test can provide clinically impactful results to enable escalation of care for high-risk patients or to identify low-risk patients who can be safely managed with routine surveillance.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.