非临床肝毒性风险评估方法的行业视角:来自2023年和2017年进行的两项纵向调查的见解

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Melanie Z Sakatis, Leah M Norona, Jamie E Karmel, William R Proctor, Fatou H Sarr, Payal Rana, Doris Zane, Jessica Caverly Rae, Samantha C Faber, Ravindra C Kodihalli, Arie Regev, Debra Luffer-Atlas, Onyi Irrechukwu, David H Alpers, Jonathan P Jackson, Armando R Irizarry Rovira, Dominic P Williams
{"title":"非临床肝毒性风险评估方法的行业视角:来自2023年和2017年进行的两项纵向调查的见解","authors":"Melanie Z Sakatis, Leah M Norona, Jamie E Karmel, William R Proctor, Fatou H Sarr, Payal Rana, Doris Zane, Jessica Caverly Rae, Samantha C Faber, Ravindra C Kodihalli, Arie Regev, Debra Luffer-Atlas, Onyi Irrechukwu, David H Alpers, Jonathan P Jackson, Armando R Irizarry Rovira, Dominic P Williams","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Nonclinical Translation Working Group of the IQ Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Consortium conducted two surveys in 2023 and 2017 to canvas member companies on approaches and experiences in the preceding 5-year periods that inform how DILI risk assessment has evolved in the past decade. Surveys comprised 53 detailed questions to understand the current status, temporal changes, and future direction and to gain insights. Focusing on the 2023 survey for the most contemporary data, responses indicated that DILI still remains a problem during drug development, with 41% of companies in the 2023 survey (50% in 2017) filing at least one clinical expedited safety report in the last 5 years. Most companies have common nonclinical screening approaches, with the majority of companies incorporating target safety assessments, considering physicochemical properties and dose, and using multiple in vitro approaches including cytotoxicity, mitotoxicity, BSEP inhibition, and various reactive metabolite assays, with the utilization of many of these being increased in the 2023 survey compared to the 2017 survey. The impact of in vivo toxicology studies on clinical study design and compound progression is also reviewed in both the 2023 and 2017 surveys. A large majority of companies now report having new modality drugs in their portfolios, including antibody-based and oligonucleotide-based modalities, cell therapies, protein degraders, and peptide-based medicines; yet only 1 or 2 companies report having modality-specific approaches to assess DILI risk despite these modalities having very different mechanisms of causing DILI compared to small molecules. This is a key area for growth in the nonclinical assessment of hepatotoxicity to support these emerging modalities and the tremendous potential that they offer for unmet clinical needs. Collaborative partnerships will be key to driving new capabilities forward in this area, contributing to the development of safer novel therapeutics for patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industry Perspective on Nonclinical Approaches for Hepatotoxicity Risk Assessment: Insights from Two Longitudinal Surveys Conducted in 2023 and 2017.\",\"authors\":\"Melanie Z Sakatis, Leah M Norona, Jamie E Karmel, William R Proctor, Fatou H Sarr, Payal Rana, Doris Zane, Jessica Caverly Rae, Samantha C Faber, Ravindra C Kodihalli, Arie Regev, Debra Luffer-Atlas, Onyi Irrechukwu, David H Alpers, Jonathan P Jackson, Armando R Irizarry Rovira, Dominic P Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Nonclinical Translation Working Group of the IQ Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Consortium conducted two surveys in 2023 and 2017 to canvas member companies on approaches and experiences in the preceding 5-year periods that inform how DILI risk assessment has evolved in the past decade. Surveys comprised 53 detailed questions to understand the current status, temporal changes, and future direction and to gain insights. Focusing on the 2023 survey for the most contemporary data, responses indicated that DILI still remains a problem during drug development, with 41% of companies in the 2023 survey (50% in 2017) filing at least one clinical expedited safety report in the last 5 years. Most companies have common nonclinical screening approaches, with the majority of companies incorporating target safety assessments, considering physicochemical properties and dose, and using multiple in vitro approaches including cytotoxicity, mitotoxicity, BSEP inhibition, and various reactive metabolite assays, with the utilization of many of these being increased in the 2023 survey compared to the 2017 survey. The impact of in vivo toxicology studies on clinical study design and compound progression is also reviewed in both the 2023 and 2017 surveys. A large majority of companies now report having new modality drugs in their portfolios, including antibody-based and oligonucleotide-based modalities, cell therapies, protein degraders, and peptide-based medicines; yet only 1 or 2 companies report having modality-specific approaches to assess DILI risk despite these modalities having very different mechanisms of causing DILI compared to small molecules. This is a key area for growth in the nonclinical assessment of hepatotoxicity to support these emerging modalities and the tremendous potential that they offer for unmet clinical needs. Collaborative partnerships will be key to driving new capabilities forward in this area, contributing to the development of safer novel therapeutics for patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00235\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

IQ药物性肝损伤(DILI)联盟的非临床翻译工作组在2023年和2017年进行了两次调查,向成员公司介绍了过去5年的方法和经验,这些方法和经验说明了DILI风险评估在过去十年中的发展情况。调查包括53个详细问题,以了解现状、时间变化和未来方向,并获得见解。关注2023年最新数据的调查结果显示,DILI在药物开发过程中仍然是一个问题,在2023年的调查中,41%的公司(2017年为50%)在过去5年中提交了至少一份临床加速安全性报告。大多数公司都有常见的非临床筛选方法,大多数公司结合了靶标安全性评估,考虑了物理化学性质和剂量,并使用多种体外方法,包括细胞毒性、有丝分裂毒性、BSEP抑制和各种反应性代谢物测定,与2017年的调查相比,2023年的调查中,其中许多方法的使用率有所增加。体内毒理学研究对临床研究设计和化合物进展的影响也在2023年和2017年的调查中进行了回顾。绝大多数公司现在报告其投资组合中有新的模式药物,包括基于抗体和基于寡核苷酸的模式、细胞疗法、蛋白质降解剂和基于肽的药物;然而,只有1或2家公司报告有特定模式的方法来评估DILI风险,尽管这些模式与小分子相比具有非常不同的导致DILI的机制。这是肝毒性非临床评估增长的关键领域,以支持这些新兴模式,以及它们为未满足的临床需求提供的巨大潜力。合作伙伴关系将是推动该领域新能力向前发展的关键,有助于为患者开发更安全的新疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Industry Perspective on Nonclinical Approaches for Hepatotoxicity Risk Assessment: Insights from Two Longitudinal Surveys Conducted in 2023 and 2017.

The Nonclinical Translation Working Group of the IQ Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Consortium conducted two surveys in 2023 and 2017 to canvas member companies on approaches and experiences in the preceding 5-year periods that inform how DILI risk assessment has evolved in the past decade. Surveys comprised 53 detailed questions to understand the current status, temporal changes, and future direction and to gain insights. Focusing on the 2023 survey for the most contemporary data, responses indicated that DILI still remains a problem during drug development, with 41% of companies in the 2023 survey (50% in 2017) filing at least one clinical expedited safety report in the last 5 years. Most companies have common nonclinical screening approaches, with the majority of companies incorporating target safety assessments, considering physicochemical properties and dose, and using multiple in vitro approaches including cytotoxicity, mitotoxicity, BSEP inhibition, and various reactive metabolite assays, with the utilization of many of these being increased in the 2023 survey compared to the 2017 survey. The impact of in vivo toxicology studies on clinical study design and compound progression is also reviewed in both the 2023 and 2017 surveys. A large majority of companies now report having new modality drugs in their portfolios, including antibody-based and oligonucleotide-based modalities, cell therapies, protein degraders, and peptide-based medicines; yet only 1 or 2 companies report having modality-specific approaches to assess DILI risk despite these modalities having very different mechanisms of causing DILI compared to small molecules. This is a key area for growth in the nonclinical assessment of hepatotoxicity to support these emerging modalities and the tremendous potential that they offer for unmet clinical needs. Collaborative partnerships will be key to driving new capabilities forward in this area, contributing to the development of safer novel therapeutics for patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
215
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信