“IT WAS SO EASY, IT DIDN’T FEEL REAL”: POSITIVE ABORTION EXPERIENCES POST-DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION

Objectives

Post-Dobbs research has focused on new and increased barriers to abortion in the US, while less attention has been paid to positive experiences with abortion. This “joy deficit” in US-based abortion research may lead abortion seekers to anticipate abortion as a negative experience.

Methods

Between July 2022 and December 2024, we conducted interviews with 74 people from abortion-restrictive states who faced logistic and legal challenges obtaining abortions after Dobbs.

Results

Interviews revealed that increased costs and interstate travel can make finding and obtaining abortion care highly burdensome. However, the majority of interviewees also shared positive experiences about the process. Caring and nonjudgmental clinic staff and volunteers at abortion funds and practical support networks helped affirm and destigmatize abortion for participants and made an unnecessarily difficult experience more bearable. These interactions left meaningful impressions, highlighting how quality care and plentiful resources contribute to positive abortion experiences for those living in abortion-restrictive states. Some expressed that despite numerous barriers, their post-Dobbs abortion experience was better and easier than other medical experiences because of strong clinical staff and practical supports they encountered.

Conclusions

This study highlights how care providers and support personnel create joy in the abortion-seeking process for those living in restrictive states post-Dobbs. The constellation of actors who care for abortion seekers can counteract the negative effects of barriers to abortion, pointing to the need for shoring up clinics, advocacy groups, and mutual aid collectives in affirming and destigmatizing abortion and contributing to positive outcomes for abortion patients.