{"title":"“这是我一生中最可怕的几天”:阿巴拉契亚人对自我管理堕胎的看法","authors":"A Alspaugh, Z Amen, B Morgan, D Jackson, G Ely","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“IT WAS THE SCARIEST FEW DAYS OF MY LIFE”: APPALACHIAN VIEWS OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION\",\"authors\":\"A Alspaugh, Z Amen, B Morgan, D Jackson, G Ely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242500321X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242500321X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“IT WAS THE SCARIEST FEW DAYS OF MY LIFE”: APPALACHIAN VIEWS OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION
Objectives
We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.
Methods
Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.
Results
Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.
Conclusions
These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.