“这是我一生中最可怕的几天”:阿巴拉契亚人对自我管理堕胎的看法

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
A Alspaugh, Z Amen, B Morgan, D Jackson, G Ely
{"title":"“这是我一生中最可怕的几天”:阿巴拉契亚人对自我管理堕胎的看法","authors":"A Alspaugh,&nbsp;Z Amen,&nbsp;B Morgan,&nbsp;D Jackson,&nbsp;G Ely","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“IT WAS THE SCARIEST FEW DAYS OF MY LIFE”: APPALACHIAN VIEWS OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION\",\"authors\":\"A Alspaugh,&nbsp;Z Amen,&nbsp;B Morgan,&nbsp;D Jackson,&nbsp;G Ely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242500321X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001078242500321X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在了解在阿巴拉契亚地区考虑过或使用过自我管理堕胎的个体对自我管理堕胎的关注和需求。方法通过匿名质量调查收集数据。这项调查是为这项研究设计的,基于之前关于自我管理堕胎的数据和我们在阿巴拉契亚的工作。符合条件的受访者是怀孕能力,18岁以上,居住在阿巴拉契亚县,并且有考虑或使用自我管理堕胎的历史,无论结果如何。这项调查由社区合作伙伴进行了试点测试,包括阿巴拉契亚地区的堕胎助产师和社区合作伙伴。招聘是在社交媒体上进行的,既有社区合作伙伴发布的帖子,也有Facebook上的广告。开放式的回答是通过主题分析进行编码的。来自阿巴拉契亚各州的177名参与者参与了这项调查。从开放文本回复中确定了四个主题:1)情绪动荡和心理困扰;2)基于隐私、可访问性和成本的动机;3)对健康风险的关注和需要指导;4)渴望获得信息、支持和联系。这些发现强调,自我管理堕胎往往不是出于偏好,而是由于成本、法律限制、耻辱或缺乏临床护理等障碍。虽然有些人报告了积极或可控的经历,但许多人将自我管理的堕胎描述为身体和情感上的痛苦,特别是在没有充分支持或可靠信息的情况下进行的。显然,需要可获得的、以证据为基础的资源和非评判性支持。改善获得准确信息、情感支持和后续护理的途径,可以极大地提高那些在阿巴拉契亚考虑或尝试自我管理堕胎的人的安全和福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“IT WAS THE SCARIEST FEW DAYS OF MY LIFE”: APPALACHIAN VIEWS OF SELF-MANAGED ABORTION

Objectives

We aimed to contextualize individual concerns and needs around self-managed abortions among a sample of Appalachians who have either considered or utilized it.

Methods

Data collection occurred via an anonymous Qualtrics survey. The survey was designed for this study, building upon prior data about self-managed abortion and our work in Appalachia. Eligible respondents were pregnancy-capable, older than 18, living in an Appalachian county, and had a history of either considering or utilizing self-managed abortion, regardless of outcome. The survey was pilot-tested by community partners, including abortion doulas and community-based partners in Appalachia. Recruitment took place over social media, both by posting from community partners and using boosted Facebook ads. Open-ended responses were coded using thematic analysis.

Results

Some 177 participants representing every state in Appalachia responded to the survey. Four themes were identified from the open-text responses: 1) Emotional turmoil and psychological distress; 2) Motivations rooted in privacy, accessibility, and cost; 3) Concerns about health risks and need for guidance; and 4) Desire for information, support, and connection.

Conclusions

These findings highlight that self-managed abortion is often pursued not out of preference but due to barriers such as cost, legal restrictions, stigma, or lack of access to clinical care. While some individuals reported positive or manageable experiences, many described self-managed abortion as physically and emotionally distressing, particularly when undertaken without adequate support or reliable information. The need for accessible, evidence-based resources and nonjudgmental support is clear. Improving access to accurate information, emotional support, and follow-up care could greatly enhance the safety and well-being of those who consider or attempt self-managed abortion in Appalachia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信