“像商业交易一样”:俄亥俄州黑人妇女对堕胎医疗的信任

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
SE Bostic, H Sihra, A Norris Turner, D Bessett, T Odum
{"title":"“像商业交易一样”:俄亥俄州黑人妇女对堕胎医疗的信任","authors":"SE Bostic,&nbsp;H Sihra,&nbsp;A Norris Turner,&nbsp;D Bessett,&nbsp;T Odum","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Growing research has examined the prevalence of medical mistrust among Black people and its impact on healthcare access, adherence, and outcomes. However, trust in the context of abortion has been seldom studied. These preliminary findings shed light on Black women’s conceptualizations of trust in their experiences with abortion and reproductive healthcare with the emergent theme of abortion as transactional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We are conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Black women in Ohio, asking them to describe their abortion and reproductive healthcare experiences. We used an iterative, inductive coding approach to analyze interview transcripts, allowing for insights from early interviews to inform ongoing data collection and refinement of codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Many participants describe their abortion experience as being “like a business transaction,” with providers “just doing their job,” and the clinic “feeling like an assembly line” where “nothing moves without the payment,” highlighting the impersonal, bureaucratic, and commodified aspects of their care. Preliminary findings indicate transactional abortion experiences, with themes of clinical detachment, emotional distance, and perceived commodification of care. However, these experiences were not monolithic; some participants also reported moments of emotional connection and validation within clinical settings, reflecting the negotiation of trust and necessity under constrained circumstances of limited choice for care, resources, and time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These initial findings complicate binary notions of medical trust and mistrust, suggesting that Black women navigate abortion care through nuanced and conditional forms of trust. Understanding these negotiations offers crucial insight into how reproductive healthcare systems can better address the specific needs and experiences of Black women.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“LIKE A BUSINESS TRANSACTION”: BLACK WOMEN’S TRUST IN ABORTION HEALTHCARE IN OHIO\",\"authors\":\"SE Bostic,&nbsp;H Sihra,&nbsp;A Norris Turner,&nbsp;D Bessett,&nbsp;T Odum\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Growing research has examined the prevalence of medical mistrust among Black people and its impact on healthcare access, adherence, and outcomes. However, trust in the context of abortion has been seldom studied. These preliminary findings shed light on Black women’s conceptualizations of trust in their experiences with abortion and reproductive healthcare with the emergent theme of abortion as transactional.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We are conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Black women in Ohio, asking them to describe their abortion and reproductive healthcare experiences. We used an iterative, inductive coding approach to analyze interview transcripts, allowing for insights from early interviews to inform ongoing data collection and refinement of codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Many participants describe their abortion experience as being “like a business transaction,” with providers “just doing their job,” and the clinic “feeling like an assembly line” where “nothing moves without the payment,” highlighting the impersonal, bureaucratic, and commodified aspects of their care. Preliminary findings indicate transactional abortion experiences, with themes of clinical detachment, emotional distance, and perceived commodification of care. However, these experiences were not monolithic; some participants also reported moments of emotional connection and validation within clinical settings, reflecting the negotiation of trust and necessity under constrained circumstances of limited choice for care, resources, and time.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These initial findings complicate binary notions of medical trust and mistrust, suggesting that Black women navigate abortion care through nuanced and conditional forms of trust. Understanding these negotiations offers crucial insight into how reproductive healthcare systems can better address the specific needs and experiences of Black women.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002768\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的研究调查了黑人中普遍存在的医疗不信任及其对医疗服务获取、依从性和结果的影响。然而,在堕胎的背景下,信任很少被研究。这些初步研究结果揭示了黑人妇女在堕胎和生殖保健方面的信任概念,以及堕胎作为交易性的新兴主题。方法我们正在对俄亥俄州的黑人妇女进行半结构化的深入访谈,要求她们描述她们的堕胎和生殖保健经历。我们使用了一种迭代的、归纳的编码方法来分析访谈记录,允许从早期访谈中获得洞察力,从而为正在进行的数据收集和代码的改进提供信息。结果许多参与者将他们的堕胎经历描述为“像一笔商业交易”,提供者“只是在做他们的工作”,诊所“感觉就像一条流水线”,“没有钱就什么都不动”,突出了他们护理的非人情味、官僚主义和商品化方面。初步发现表明事务性流产经验,与临床脱离,情感距离和感知的商品化护理的主题。然而,这些体验并不是单一的;一些参与者还报告了在临床环境中情感联系和验证的时刻,反映了在有限的护理,资源和时间选择的限制情况下信任和必要性的谈判。这些初步发现使医疗信任和不信任的二元概念复杂化,表明黑人妇女通过微妙和有条件的信任形式来进行堕胎护理。了解这些谈判对生殖保健系统如何更好地满足黑人妇女的特殊需求和经历提供了至关重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“LIKE A BUSINESS TRANSACTION”: BLACK WOMEN’S TRUST IN ABORTION HEALTHCARE IN OHIO

Objectives

Growing research has examined the prevalence of medical mistrust among Black people and its impact on healthcare access, adherence, and outcomes. However, trust in the context of abortion has been seldom studied. These preliminary findings shed light on Black women’s conceptualizations of trust in their experiences with abortion and reproductive healthcare with the emergent theme of abortion as transactional.

Methods

We are conducting semi-structured, in-depth interviews with Black women in Ohio, asking them to describe their abortion and reproductive healthcare experiences. We used an iterative, inductive coding approach to analyze interview transcripts, allowing for insights from early interviews to inform ongoing data collection and refinement of codes.

Results

Many participants describe their abortion experience as being “like a business transaction,” with providers “just doing their job,” and the clinic “feeling like an assembly line” where “nothing moves without the payment,” highlighting the impersonal, bureaucratic, and commodified aspects of their care. Preliminary findings indicate transactional abortion experiences, with themes of clinical detachment, emotional distance, and perceived commodification of care. However, these experiences were not monolithic; some participants also reported moments of emotional connection and validation within clinical settings, reflecting the negotiation of trust and necessity under constrained circumstances of limited choice for care, resources, and time.

Conclusions

These initial findings complicate binary notions of medical trust and mistrust, suggesting that Black women navigate abortion care through nuanced and conditional forms of trust. Understanding these negotiations offers crucial insight into how reproductive healthcare systems can better address the specific needs and experiences of Black women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信