{"title":"多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后宾夕法尼亚州西部的堕胎量","authors":"RL Shay, BA Chen, KP Himes","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We compared the number and characteristics of abortions in two practice settings in western Pennsylvania before and after <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an academic medical center (in-hospital) and a freestanding abortion clinic (out-of-hospital) between July 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023. We collected data on total number of abortions, gestational duration, proportion performed in the second trimester, type of abortion, and patient age and state of residence. We compared abortions between July 2021 and May 2022 (pre-<em>Dobbs</em>) with those between July 2022 and May 2023 (post-<em>Dobbs</em>) using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. We repeated the analysis stratifying by site.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total number of abortions across the two sites was 3,114 pre-<em>Dobbs</em> and 3,153 post-<em>Dobbs</em>. Post-<em>Dobbs</em> in-hospital abortions had a lower median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 12 weeks, p<0.01) and these patients were less likely to be from out-of-state (8.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.04). In contrast, post-<em>Dobbs</em> out-of-hospital abortion patients had a higher median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 8 weeks, p<0.01) and patients were more likely to be from out-of-state (26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Out-of-hospital abortions were more likely to be from out-of-state and occurred at later gestational ages post-<em>Dobbs</em> than pre-<em>Dobbs</em>, while the opposite trends were seen for in-hospital abortion patients. The differences between sites suggest that the burden of increased demand from out-of-state patients was disproportionately absorbed by community abortion providers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 111105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ABORTION VOLUME IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BEFORE AND AFTER DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION\",\"authors\":\"RL Shay, BA Chen, KP Himes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2025.111105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We compared the number and characteristics of abortions in two practice settings in western Pennsylvania before and after <em>Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an academic medical center (in-hospital) and a freestanding abortion clinic (out-of-hospital) between July 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023. We collected data on total number of abortions, gestational duration, proportion performed in the second trimester, type of abortion, and patient age and state of residence. We compared abortions between July 2021 and May 2022 (pre-<em>Dobbs</em>) with those between July 2022 and May 2023 (post-<em>Dobbs</em>) using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. We repeated the analysis stratifying by site.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The total number of abortions across the two sites was 3,114 pre-<em>Dobbs</em> and 3,153 post-<em>Dobbs</em>. Post-<em>Dobbs</em> in-hospital abortions had a lower median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 12 weeks, p<0.01) and these patients were less likely to be from out-of-state (8.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.04). In contrast, post-<em>Dobbs</em> out-of-hospital abortion patients had a higher median gestational duration than did those pre-<em>Dobbs</em> (9 vs. 8 weeks, p<0.01) and patients were more likely to be from out-of-state (26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Out-of-hospital abortions were more likely to be from out-of-state and occurred at later gestational ages post-<em>Dobbs</em> than pre-<em>Dobbs</em>, while the opposite trends were seen for in-hospital abortion patients. The differences between sites suggest that the burden of increased demand from out-of-state patients was disproportionately absorbed by community abortion providers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002963\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782425002963","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案前后宾夕法尼亚州西部两家诊所的堕胎数量和特点。方法对2021年7月1日至2023年5月31日期间在一家学术医疗中心(院内)和一家独立堕胎诊所(院外)进行的所有堕胎进行回顾性队列研究。我们收集了流产总数、妊娠期、妊娠中期比例、流产类型、患者年龄和居住州等数据。我们使用t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验比较了2021年7月至2022年5月(多布斯前)和2022年7月至2023年5月(多布斯后)的堕胎情况。我们按地点分层重复分析。结果多布斯前和多布斯后两地流产总数分别为3114例和3153例。多布斯手术后住院流产的中位妊娠持续时间比多布斯手术前低(9周对12周,p= 0.01),这些患者来自州外的可能性更低(8.8%对13.1%,p=0.04)。相比之下,多布斯手术后院外流产患者的中位妊娠期高于多布斯手术前的患者(9周vs. 8周,p<0.01),患者更可能来自州外(26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01)。结论院外流产发生于州外,发生于多布斯手术后比多布斯手术前的胎龄更晚,而院内流产患者的趋势则相反。不同地点之间的差异表明,州外患者需求增加的负担被社区堕胎提供者不成比例地吸收了。
ABORTION VOLUME IN WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BEFORE AND AFTER DOBBS V JACKSON WOMEN’S HEALTH ORGANIZATION
Objectives
We compared the number and characteristics of abortions in two practice settings in western Pennsylvania before and after Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all abortions performed at an academic medical center (in-hospital) and a freestanding abortion clinic (out-of-hospital) between July 1, 2021 and May 31, 2023. We collected data on total number of abortions, gestational duration, proportion performed in the second trimester, type of abortion, and patient age and state of residence. We compared abortions between July 2021 and May 2022 (pre-Dobbs) with those between July 2022 and May 2023 (post-Dobbs) using t tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests. We repeated the analysis stratifying by site.
Results
The total number of abortions across the two sites was 3,114 pre-Dobbs and 3,153 post-Dobbs. Post-Dobbs in-hospital abortions had a lower median gestational duration than did those pre-Dobbs (9 vs. 12 weeks, p<0.01) and these patients were less likely to be from out-of-state (8.8% vs. 13.1%, p=0.04). In contrast, post-Dobbs out-of-hospital abortion patients had a higher median gestational duration than did those pre-Dobbs (9 vs. 8 weeks, p<0.01) and patients were more likely to be from out-of-state (26.6% vs. 16.3%, p<0.01).
Conclusions
Out-of-hospital abortions were more likely to be from out-of-state and occurred at later gestational ages post-Dobbs than pre-Dobbs, while the opposite trends were seen for in-hospital abortion patients. The differences between sites suggest that the burden of increased demand from out-of-state patients was disproportionately absorbed by community abortion providers.
期刊介绍:
Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.