袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的体重减轻和代谢综合征参数比较:倾向评分分析。

María Asunción Acosta-Mérida, Raquel Bañolas-Suárez, Julia Díaz-Dávila, Pedro Saavedra-Santana, Joaquín Marchena-Gómez
{"title":"袖式胃切除术和Roux-en-Y胃旁路术的体重减轻和代谢综合征参数比较:倾向评分分析。","authors":"María Asunción Acosta-Mérida, Raquel Bañolas-Suárez, Julia Díaz-Dávila, Pedro Saavedra-Santana, Joaquín Marchena-Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has positioned itself as the leading bariatric technique worldwide, surpassing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), its possible inferiority in terms of weight and metabolic results remains controversial. The of this study was to compare the response of both techniques in terms of weight loss and obesity-related metabolic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who had undergone LSG and LRYGB in our center from 2013 to 2022. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, postoperative weight loss and evolution of comorbidities were recorded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to homogenize the 2 intervention groups for body mass index (BMI) and preoperative metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 354 patients who met the selection criteria, 309 patients were ultimately included in the study (172 LSG and 137 LRYGB); mean age was 45.8 ± 9.5 years; 205 were women (66.3%). Median BMI was 47 (interquartile range = 42.8 - 52.9). After propensity score matching, 118 patients remained in each group. BMI trajectories during the first 3 years of follow-up after the 2 types of surgery showed no significant differences (P = .693). One month after treatment, there were also no differences in postoperative metabolic syndrome parameters or complication rates (P = .866).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that sleeve gastrectomy provides a similar weight and metabolic response to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with similar BMI and metabolic syndrome characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":"800226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of weight loss and metabolic syndrome parameters between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A propensity score analysis.\",\"authors\":\"María Asunción Acosta-Mérida, Raquel Bañolas-Suárez, Julia Díaz-Dávila, Pedro Saavedra-Santana, Joaquín Marchena-Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has positioned itself as the leading bariatric technique worldwide, surpassing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), its possible inferiority in terms of weight and metabolic results remains controversial. The of this study was to compare the response of both techniques in terms of weight loss and obesity-related metabolic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who had undergone LSG and LRYGB in our center from 2013 to 2022. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, postoperative weight loss and evolution of comorbidities were recorded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to homogenize the 2 intervention groups for body mass index (BMI) and preoperative metabolic syndrome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 354 patients who met the selection criteria, 309 patients were ultimately included in the study (172 LSG and 137 LRYGB); mean age was 45.8 ± 9.5 years; 205 were women (66.3%). Median BMI was 47 (interquartile range = 42.8 - 52.9). After propensity score matching, 118 patients remained in each group. BMI trajectories during the first 3 years of follow-up after the 2 types of surgery showed no significant differences (P = .693). One month after treatment, there were also no differences in postoperative metabolic syndrome parameters or complication rates (P = .866).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that sleeve gastrectomy provides a similar weight and metabolic response to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with similar BMI and metabolic syndrome characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia espanola\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"800226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2025.800226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:尽管腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)已经超越腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术(LRYGB),成为全球领先的减肥技术,但其在体重和代谢结果方面可能存在的劣势仍然存在争议。本研究的目的是比较两种技术在减肥和肥胖相关代谢并发症方面的反应。方法:对2013年至2022年在我中心接受LSG和LRYGB治疗的所有患者进行回顾性研究。记录患者特征、术后并发症、术后体重减轻和合并症的演变情况。采用倾向评分匹配(1:1)对体重指数(BMI)和术前代谢综合征进行均一化。结果:在符合选择标准的354例患者中,309例患者最终被纳入研究(172例LSG和137例LRYGB);平均年龄45.8±9.5岁;205例为女性(66.3%)。BMI中位数为47(四分位数范围为42.8 - 52.9)。倾向评分匹配后,每组保留118例患者。两种手术后3年随访的BMI轨迹差异无统计学意义(P = .693)。治疗1个月后,两组患者的术后代谢综合征参数及并发症发生率也无差异(P = .866)。结论:我们的数据表明,在BMI和代谢综合征特征相似的患者中,套筒胃切除术提供了与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术相似的体重和代谢反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of weight loss and metabolic syndrome parameters between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A propensity score analysis.

Introduction: Although laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has positioned itself as the leading bariatric technique worldwide, surpassing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), its possible inferiority in terms of weight and metabolic results remains controversial. The of this study was to compare the response of both techniques in terms of weight loss and obesity-related metabolic complications.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients who had undergone LSG and LRYGB in our center from 2013 to 2022. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, postoperative weight loss and evolution of comorbidities were recorded. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to homogenize the 2 intervention groups for body mass index (BMI) and preoperative metabolic syndrome.

Results: Out of the 354 patients who met the selection criteria, 309 patients were ultimately included in the study (172 LSG and 137 LRYGB); mean age was 45.8 ± 9.5 years; 205 were women (66.3%). Median BMI was 47 (interquartile range = 42.8 - 52.9). After propensity score matching, 118 patients remained in each group. BMI trajectories during the first 3 years of follow-up after the 2 types of surgery showed no significant differences (P = .693). One month after treatment, there were also no differences in postoperative metabolic syndrome parameters or complication rates (P = .866).

Conclusions: Our data suggest that sleeve gastrectomy provides a similar weight and metabolic response to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with similar BMI and metabolic syndrome characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信