是什么影响了双相情感障碍自我管理应用程序的使用?对PolarUs应用程序的使用情况进行定性调查。

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-10-10 eCollection Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0001017
Emma Morton, Rachelle Hole, Heather O'Brien, Linda Li, Steven J Barnes, Erin E Michalak
{"title":"是什么影响了双相情感障碍自我管理应用程序的使用?对PolarUs应用程序的使用情况进行定性调查。","authors":"Emma Morton, Rachelle Hole, Heather O'Brien, Linda Li, Steven J Barnes, Erin E Michalak","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interventions delivered via smartphone apps may support individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to learn about and implement evidence-based self-management strategies in the context of their daily lives. However, app usage rates are often suboptimal. The subjective experience of users may provide insights into factors influencing engagement (and disengagement) with an mHealth intervention. The present study describes a qualitative investigation of the experiences of people with BD who participated in the evaluation of a novel app-based intervention for BD self-management, the PolarUs app. Twenty-five individuals with BD were provided with access to an app-based self-management intervention over a three-month study period, and were later interviewed about personal experiences of engagement with the intervention, including attempts to enact self-management strategies. Thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of the experience of engaging with a self-management app. Three themes describing drivers of engagement with the PolarUs app and associated features were generated: 1) Motivations, 2) Salience, and 3) Perceived effort. Drivers of engagement were shaped by contextual influences, summarised in four themes: 1) The smartphone ecosystem, 2) Daily life, 3) Mood symptoms, and 4) Involvement in a research study. The findings of this research generate insights into how individuals with BD engage with app-based interventions. Lived experience perspectives can inform the design of engaging app-based interventions for BD. Further, these findings emphasise the importance of considering the context in which people use self-management apps for BD for both research studies and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 10","pages":"e0001017"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513578/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What influences engagement with a bipolar disorder self-management app? A qualitative investigation of use of the PolarUs app.\",\"authors\":\"Emma Morton, Rachelle Hole, Heather O'Brien, Linda Li, Steven J Barnes, Erin E Michalak\",\"doi\":\"10.1371/journal.pdig.0001017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Interventions delivered via smartphone apps may support individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to learn about and implement evidence-based self-management strategies in the context of their daily lives. However, app usage rates are often suboptimal. The subjective experience of users may provide insights into factors influencing engagement (and disengagement) with an mHealth intervention. The present study describes a qualitative investigation of the experiences of people with BD who participated in the evaluation of a novel app-based intervention for BD self-management, the PolarUs app. Twenty-five individuals with BD were provided with access to an app-based self-management intervention over a three-month study period, and were later interviewed about personal experiences of engagement with the intervention, including attempts to enact self-management strategies. Thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of the experience of engaging with a self-management app. Three themes describing drivers of engagement with the PolarUs app and associated features were generated: 1) Motivations, 2) Salience, and 3) Perceived effort. Drivers of engagement were shaped by contextual influences, summarised in four themes: 1) The smartphone ecosystem, 2) Daily life, 3) Mood symptoms, and 4) Involvement in a research study. The findings of this research generate insights into how individuals with BD engage with app-based interventions. Lived experience perspectives can inform the design of engaging app-based interventions for BD. Further, these findings emphasise the importance of considering the context in which people use self-management apps for BD for both research studies and implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"volume\":\"4 10\",\"pages\":\"e0001017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513578/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PLOS digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过智能手机应用程序提供的干预措施可以帮助双相情感障碍(BD)患者在日常生活中学习和实施基于证据的自我管理策略。然而,应用的使用率往往不是最理想的。用户的主观体验可以提供对影响移动医疗干预的参与(和脱离)因素的见解。本研究描述了一项对双相障碍患者体验的定性调查,这些患者参与了一种新的基于应用程序的双相障碍自我管理干预的评估,PolarUs应用程序。在为期三个月的研究期间,25名双相障碍患者获得了基于应用程序的自我管理干预,随后接受了关于参与干预的个人经历的访谈,包括试图制定自我管理策略。主题分析用于确定参与自我管理应用体验的重要方面。我们生成了三个主题来描述参与PolarUs应用和相关功能的驱动因素:1)动机,2)显著性,3)感知努力。用户粘性的驱动因素受到情境影响的影响,概括为四个主题:1)智能手机生态系统,2)日常生活,3)情绪症状,4)参与研究。这项研究的发现为双相障碍患者如何参与基于应用程序的干预提供了见解。生活经验视角可以为基于应用程序的双相障碍干预设计提供信息。此外,这些研究结果强调了考虑人们在研究和实施中使用双相障碍自我管理应用程序的背景的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What influences engagement with a bipolar disorder self-management app? A qualitative investigation of use of the PolarUs app.

Interventions delivered via smartphone apps may support individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) to learn about and implement evidence-based self-management strategies in the context of their daily lives. However, app usage rates are often suboptimal. The subjective experience of users may provide insights into factors influencing engagement (and disengagement) with an mHealth intervention. The present study describes a qualitative investigation of the experiences of people with BD who participated in the evaluation of a novel app-based intervention for BD self-management, the PolarUs app. Twenty-five individuals with BD were provided with access to an app-based self-management intervention over a three-month study period, and were later interviewed about personal experiences of engagement with the intervention, including attempts to enact self-management strategies. Thematic analysis was used to identify important aspects of the experience of engaging with a self-management app. Three themes describing drivers of engagement with the PolarUs app and associated features were generated: 1) Motivations, 2) Salience, and 3) Perceived effort. Drivers of engagement were shaped by contextual influences, summarised in four themes: 1) The smartphone ecosystem, 2) Daily life, 3) Mood symptoms, and 4) Involvement in a research study. The findings of this research generate insights into how individuals with BD engage with app-based interventions. Lived experience perspectives can inform the design of engaging app-based interventions for BD. Further, these findings emphasise the importance of considering the context in which people use self-management apps for BD for both research studies and implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信