髓内富血小板血浆对老年粗隆间骨折骨折愈合的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Saran Tantavisut, Sanzhar Artykbay, Chavarin Amarase, Siripong Tantanarat, Sinsuda Dechsupa, Sittisak Honsawek
{"title":"髓内富血小板血浆对老年粗隆间骨折骨折愈合的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Saran Tantavisut, Sanzhar Artykbay, Chavarin Amarase, Siripong Tantanarat, Sinsuda Dechsupa, Sittisak Honsawek","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly present challenges due to poor bone healing and high complication rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may promote early bone regeneration, but clinical evidence, especially for osteoporotic fractures, is limited. Unlike extramedullary injections, intramedullary PRP specifically targets the vascular marrow at the fracture site. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of intramedullary PRP application on fracture healing and clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation for intertrochanteric fractures.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that intramedullary PRP would accelerate early bone healing and improve postoperative functional recovery compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted from November 2020 to December 2024. Patients aged ≥60 years with isolated low-energy intertrochanteric femoral fractures were randomized to receive either 5 mL of autologous PRP or 5 mL of normal saline intraoperatively. All patients underwent fixation with a short cephalomedullary nail. Follow-up assessments were performed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were randomized (40 to the PRP group, 44 to the control group), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At 2 weeks, the PRP group showed a significantly higher Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) than the control group (12.0 vs. 10.5; P <  0.001); however, no significant differences were observed at 6 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Postoperative bone turnover markers (P1NP, osteocalcin, ALP, Beta-Crosslaps, and bone-specific ALP) were comparable between groups. Functional outcomes, assessed by the Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, and De Morton Mobility Index at 6 weeks and 6 months, did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Intramedullary PRP did not improve mid- to long-term fracture healing or functional outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Although early radiographic healing was enhanced at 2 weeks, this benefit was not sustained over time. Functional recovery also showed no significant difference. PRP may offer limited clinical benefit in this population, and further research is needed to assess its role in selected subgroups or with modified protocols.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>I.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of intramedullary platelet-rich plasma on fracture healing in elderly intertrochanteric fractures: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Saran Tantavisut, Sanzhar Artykbay, Chavarin Amarase, Siripong Tantanarat, Sinsuda Dechsupa, Sittisak Honsawek\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly present challenges due to poor bone healing and high complication rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may promote early bone regeneration, but clinical evidence, especially for osteoporotic fractures, is limited. Unlike extramedullary injections, intramedullary PRP specifically targets the vascular marrow at the fracture site. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of intramedullary PRP application on fracture healing and clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation for intertrochanteric fractures.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>We hypothesized that intramedullary PRP would accelerate early bone healing and improve postoperative functional recovery compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-center, double-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted from November 2020 to December 2024. Patients aged ≥60 years with isolated low-energy intertrochanteric femoral fractures were randomized to receive either 5 mL of autologous PRP or 5 mL of normal saline intraoperatively. All patients underwent fixation with a short cephalomedullary nail. Follow-up assessments were performed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were randomized (40 to the PRP group, 44 to the control group), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At 2 weeks, the PRP group showed a significantly higher Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) than the control group (12.0 vs. 10.5; P <  0.001); however, no significant differences were observed at 6 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Postoperative bone turnover markers (P1NP, osteocalcin, ALP, Beta-Crosslaps, and bone-specific ALP) were comparable between groups. Functional outcomes, assessed by the Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, and De Morton Mobility Index at 6 weeks and 6 months, did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Intramedullary PRP did not improve mid- to long-term fracture healing or functional outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Although early radiographic healing was enhanced at 2 weeks, this benefit was not sustained over time. Functional recovery also showed no significant difference. PRP may offer limited clinical benefit in this population, and further research is needed to assess its role in selected subgroups or with modified protocols.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104457\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人转子间骨折由于骨愈合不良和并发症发生率高而面临挑战。富血小板血浆(PRP)可能促进早期骨再生,但临床证据,特别是骨质疏松性骨折,是有限的。与髓外注射不同,髓内PRP专门针对骨折部位的血管骨髓。本随机对照试验旨在评估髓内PRP应用对老年股骨粗隆间骨折手术固定患者骨折愈合和临床结果的影响。假设:我们假设与安慰剂相比,髓内PRP可以加速早期骨愈合并改善术后功能恢复。患者和方法:该单中心、双盲、平行组试验于2020年11月至2024年12月进行。年龄≥60岁的孤立性低能量股骨粗隆间骨折患者随机接受5ml自体PRP或5ml生理盐水术中。所有患者均采用短头髓内钉固定。分别于术后2周、6周、3个月和6个月进行随访评估。结果:84例患者随机分组(PRP组40例,对照组44例),基线特征无显著差异。2周时,PRP组的髋关节放射联合评分(RUSH)明显高于对照组(12.0比10.5)。讨论:髓内PRP不能改善老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者的中长期骨折愈合或功能结局。尽管早期x线摄影治疗在2周时得到了加强,但这种益处并没有随着时间的推移而持续。功能恢复也无显著性差异。PRP在这一人群中可能提供有限的临床益处,需要进一步的研究来评估其在选定亚组或修改方案中的作用。证据等级:1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of intramedullary platelet-rich plasma on fracture healing in elderly intertrochanteric fractures: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: Intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly present challenges due to poor bone healing and high complication rates. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may promote early bone regeneration, but clinical evidence, especially for osteoporotic fractures, is limited. Unlike extramedullary injections, intramedullary PRP specifically targets the vascular marrow at the fracture site. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effect of intramedullary PRP application on fracture healing and clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing surgical fixation for intertrochanteric fractures.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that intramedullary PRP would accelerate early bone healing and improve postoperative functional recovery compared to placebo.

Patients and methods: This single-center, double-blind, parallel-group trial was conducted from November 2020 to December 2024. Patients aged ≥60 years with isolated low-energy intertrochanteric femoral fractures were randomized to receive either 5 mL of autologous PRP or 5 mL of normal saline intraoperatively. All patients underwent fixation with a short cephalomedullary nail. Follow-up assessments were performed at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: Eighty-four patients were randomized (40 to the PRP group, 44 to the control group), with no significant differences in baseline characteristics. At 2 weeks, the PRP group showed a significantly higher Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) than the control group (12.0 vs. 10.5; P <  0.001); however, no significant differences were observed at 6 weeks, 3 months, or 6 months. Postoperative bone turnover markers (P1NP, osteocalcin, ALP, Beta-Crosslaps, and bone-specific ALP) were comparable between groups. Functional outcomes, assessed by the Harris Hip Score, Barthel Index, and De Morton Mobility Index at 6 weeks and 6 months, did not differ significantly.

Discussion: Intramedullary PRP did not improve mid- to long-term fracture healing or functional outcomes in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Although early radiographic healing was enhanced at 2 weeks, this benefit was not sustained over time. Functional recovery also showed no significant difference. PRP may offer limited clinical benefit in this population, and further research is needed to assess its role in selected subgroups or with modified protocols.

Level of evidence: I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信