关节镜下灌洗保存移植物治疗感染性关节炎前交叉韧带重建后的功能结果:随访7年的病例对照研究。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Martin Tripon, Maxime Bougard, Arthur Gras, Guillaume Mergenthaler, Gaelle Maroteau, Christophe Hulet
{"title":"关节镜下灌洗保存移植物治疗感染性关节炎前交叉韧带重建后的功能结果:随访7年的病例对照研究。","authors":"Martin Tripon, Maxime Bougard, Arthur Gras, Guillaume Mergenthaler, Gaelle Maroteau, Christophe Hulet","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Septic arthritis is a rare but serious complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Arthroscopic lavage with graft retention and antibiotic therapy is considered to be the gold standard for the initial treatment of surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes between patients with septic ACL reconstructions and those without septic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon study. ACLR complicated by surgical site infection between 2010 and 2022 were matched 1:1 with ACLR without septic complications performed during the same period. Matching criteria included age, sex, body mass index, existence of meniscal and chondral lesions, graft type used, postoperative follow-up duration, and smoking status. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, Lysholm, KOOS, and Tegner scores. Return to sport and level of return were also evaluated in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 septic ACLR were matched with non-septic ACLR. At a mean follow-up of 7 ± 3 years, no recurrent infections were observed; only one patient required a second lavage. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), or the Knee injury of Osteoarthritis Outcomes (KOOS) scores between septic and non-septic groups (Lysholm: 89.1 ± 10.4 vs 92.1 ± 8.5, p = 0.32; IKDC: 82.9 ± 12.6 vs 88.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.10; KOOS: 89.9 ± 9.9 vs 91.7 ± 9.7, p = 0.80). No significant difference was observed in activity level at final follow-up (Tegner: 4.9 ± 1.2 vs 5.5 ± 1.8, p = 0.18). However, time to return to sport was significantly longer in the septic ACLR group (10.2 ± 1.1 months vs 8.1 ± 2.1 months, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the level of return to sport (53% returned to the same level in the septic group vs 65% in the non-septic group, p = 0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When treated early with arthroscopic lavage and antibiotic therapy without graft removal, septic arthritis following ACLR yields comparable functional outcomes to uncomplicated ACLR at 7-year follow-up. This approach allows good clinical recovery and limits long-term functional impact, but with a longer rehabilitation period before returning to sport. Arthroscopic lavage remains the first-line treatment in cases of septic arthritis after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, septic arthritis, arthroscopic lavage, clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional results of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction treated by arthroscopic lavage with preservation of the graft: case-control study at 7 years follow-up.\",\"authors\":\"Martin Tripon, Maxime Bougard, Arthur Gras, Guillaume Mergenthaler, Gaelle Maroteau, Christophe Hulet\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Septic arthritis is a rare but serious complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Arthroscopic lavage with graft retention and antibiotic therapy is considered to be the gold standard for the initial treatment of surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes between patients with septic ACL reconstructions and those without septic complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon study. ACLR complicated by surgical site infection between 2010 and 2022 were matched 1:1 with ACLR without septic complications performed during the same period. Matching criteria included age, sex, body mass index, existence of meniscal and chondral lesions, graft type used, postoperative follow-up duration, and smoking status. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, Lysholm, KOOS, and Tegner scores. Return to sport and level of return were also evaluated in each group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 septic ACLR were matched with non-septic ACLR. At a mean follow-up of 7 ± 3 years, no recurrent infections were observed; only one patient required a second lavage. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), or the Knee injury of Osteoarthritis Outcomes (KOOS) scores between septic and non-septic groups (Lysholm: 89.1 ± 10.4 vs 92.1 ± 8.5, p = 0.32; IKDC: 82.9 ± 12.6 vs 88.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.10; KOOS: 89.9 ± 9.9 vs 91.7 ± 9.7, p = 0.80). No significant difference was observed in activity level at final follow-up (Tegner: 4.9 ± 1.2 vs 5.5 ± 1.8, p = 0.18). However, time to return to sport was significantly longer in the septic ACLR group (10.2 ± 1.1 months vs 8.1 ± 2.1 months, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the level of return to sport (53% returned to the same level in the septic group vs 65% in the non-septic group, p = 0.49).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When treated early with arthroscopic lavage and antibiotic therapy without graft removal, septic arthritis following ACLR yields comparable functional outcomes to uncomplicated ACLR at 7-year follow-up. This approach allows good clinical recovery and limits long-term functional impact, but with a longer rehabilitation period before returning to sport. Arthroscopic lavage remains the first-line treatment in cases of septic arthritis after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, septic arthritis, arthroscopic lavage, clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104455\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104455\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:感染性关节炎是前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后罕见但严重的并发症。关节镜下灌洗伴移植物保留和抗生素治疗被认为是手术部位感染初始治疗的金标准。本研究的目的是比较感染性前交叉韧带重建患者和无感染性并发症患者的长期临床和功能结果。方法:这是一项回顾性、单中心、多外科医生的研究。2010年至2022年间合并手术部位感染的ACLR与同期无脓毒性并发症的ACLR进行1:1匹配。匹配标准包括年龄、性别、体重指数、是否存在半月板和软骨病变、使用的移植物类型、术后随访时间和吸烟状况。在最后的随访中,使用IKDC、Lysholm、kos和Tegner评分评估功能结局。对每组的恢复运动和恢复水平也进行了评估。结果:17例化脓性ACLR与非化脓性ACLR配对。平均随访7±3年,无复发感染;只有一个病人需要第二次洗胃。Lysholm,国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC),或膝关节损伤骨关节炎结局(oos)评分在脓毒症组和非脓毒症组之间无显著差异(Lysholm: 89.1±10.4 vs 92.1±8.5,p = 0.32; IKDC: 82.9±12.6 vs 88.5±11.2,p = 0.10; oos: 89.9±9.9 vs 91.7±9.7,p = 0.80)。在最终随访时,两组的活动水平无显著差异(Tegner: 4.9±1.2 vs 5.5±1.8,p = 0.18)。然而,脓毒性ACLR组恢复运动时间明显更长(10.2±1.1个月vs 8.1±2.1个月,p = 0.01)。在恢复运动水平上没有显著差异(53%的败血症组和65%的非败血症组恢复到相同水平,p = 0.49)。结论:在7年的随访中,如果采用关节镜冲洗和抗生素治疗而不切除移植物,ACLR后脓毒性关节炎的功能结果与无并发症ACLR相当。这种方法可以获得良好的临床恢复,限制长期的功能影响,但在恢复运动之前需要更长的康复期。关节镜灌洗仍然是ACLR后脓毒性关节炎的一线治疗方法。关键词:前交叉韧带,脓毒性关节炎,关节镜灌洗,临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Functional results of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction treated by arthroscopic lavage with preservation of the graft: case-control study at 7 years follow-up.

Introduction: Septic arthritis is a rare but serious complication following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Arthroscopic lavage with graft retention and antibiotic therapy is considered to be the gold standard for the initial treatment of surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes between patients with septic ACL reconstructions and those without septic complications.

Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, multi-surgeon study. ACLR complicated by surgical site infection between 2010 and 2022 were matched 1:1 with ACLR without septic complications performed during the same period. Matching criteria included age, sex, body mass index, existence of meniscal and chondral lesions, graft type used, postoperative follow-up duration, and smoking status. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were assessed using IKDC, Lysholm, KOOS, and Tegner scores. Return to sport and level of return were also evaluated in each group.

Results: 17 septic ACLR were matched with non-septic ACLR. At a mean follow-up of 7 ± 3 years, no recurrent infections were observed; only one patient required a second lavage. There were no significant differences in the Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), or the Knee injury of Osteoarthritis Outcomes (KOOS) scores between septic and non-septic groups (Lysholm: 89.1 ± 10.4 vs 92.1 ± 8.5, p = 0.32; IKDC: 82.9 ± 12.6 vs 88.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.10; KOOS: 89.9 ± 9.9 vs 91.7 ± 9.7, p = 0.80). No significant difference was observed in activity level at final follow-up (Tegner: 4.9 ± 1.2 vs 5.5 ± 1.8, p = 0.18). However, time to return to sport was significantly longer in the septic ACLR group (10.2 ± 1.1 months vs 8.1 ± 2.1 months, p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in the level of return to sport (53% returned to the same level in the septic group vs 65% in the non-septic group, p = 0.49).

Conclusion: When treated early with arthroscopic lavage and antibiotic therapy without graft removal, septic arthritis following ACLR yields comparable functional outcomes to uncomplicated ACLR at 7-year follow-up. This approach allows good clinical recovery and limits long-term functional impact, but with a longer rehabilitation period before returning to sport. Arthroscopic lavage remains the first-line treatment in cases of septic arthritis after ACLR.

Level of evidence: IV Keywords: Anterior cruciate ligament, septic arthritis, arthroscopic lavage, clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信