{"title":"超高分辨率CT图像质量随门框旋转时间的变化及重建算法。","authors":"Minori Hoshika, Shingo Kayano, Noriaki Akagi, Tomohiro Inoue, Yoshinori Funama","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Quality Variation with Gantry Rotation Time and Reconstruction Algorithm in Ultra-high-resolution CT.\",\"authors\":\"Minori Hoshika, Shingo Kayano, Noriaki Akagi, Tomohiro Inoue, Yoshinori Funama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Image Quality Variation with Gantry Rotation Time and Reconstruction Algorithm in Ultra-high-resolution CT.
Rationale and objectives: In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).
Materials and methods: A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.
Results: MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.
Conclusion: While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.