超高分辨率CT图像质量随门框旋转时间的变化及重建算法。

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Minori Hoshika, Shingo Kayano, Noriaki Akagi, Tomohiro Inoue, Yoshinori Funama
{"title":"超高分辨率CT图像质量随门框旋转时间的变化及重建算法。","authors":"Minori Hoshika, Shingo Kayano, Noriaki Akagi, Tomohiro Inoue, Yoshinori Funama","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Image Quality Variation with Gantry Rotation Time and Reconstruction Algorithm in Ultra-high-resolution CT.\",\"authors\":\"Minori Hoshika, Shingo Kayano, Noriaki Akagi, Tomohiro Inoue, Yoshinori Funama\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2025.09.027","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理和目的:在超高分辨率CT (U-HRCT)中,当使用小焦斑时,有时使用较长的龙门旋转时间来保持图像质量。本研究旨在评估龙门旋转时间对深度学习重建(DLR)、基于模型的迭代重建(MBIR)和滤波后投影(FBP)图像质量的影响。材料和方法:在U-HRCT扫描仪上以四种剂量水平和四次龙门旋转时间扫描幻体,并使用DLR, MBIR和FBP算法重建图像。图像质量评估噪声特性和高对比度分辨率。利用噪声功率谱(NPS)对噪声进行表征,计算MBIR和DLR相对于FBP的噪声幅值比和中心频率比,并根据轮廓曲线确定高对比度分辨率。结果:MBIR和FBP在所有旋转时间内表现出一致的图像质量,没有统计学上的显著差异。相比之下,DLR在1.0 s旋转时间下的高对比度分辨率明显低于0.5-0.75s (p结论:虽然DLR在0.5-0.75s旋转时间下具有较好的图像质量,但在1.0 s旋转时间下分辨率会下降,并且噪声纹理会发生改变。这种退化可能是由于算法在处理训练集中未充分表示的数据分布时的局限性。因此,为了优化诊断性能,必须根据具体的重建算法精心定制扫描参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Image Quality Variation with Gantry Rotation Time and Reconstruction Algorithm in Ultra-high-resolution CT.

Rationale and objectives: In ultra-high-resolution CT (U-HRCT), longer gantry rotation times are sometimes used to maintain image quality when using a small focal spot. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gantry rotation time on image quality for deep learning reconstruction (DLR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), and filtered back projection (FBP).

Materials and methods: A phantom was scanned on a U-HRCT scanner at four dose levels and four gantry rotation times, with images reconstructed using DLR, MBIR, and FBP algorithms. Image quality was evaluated for noise characteristics and high-contrast resolution. Noise was characterized using the noise power spectrum (NPS) to compute the noise magnitude ratio and central frequency ratio for MBIR and DLR relative to FBP, while high-contrast resolution was determined from the profile curve.

Results: MBIR and FBP demonstrated consistent image quality across all rotation times, with no statistically significant differences observed. In contrast, DLR showed significantly lower high-contrast resolution at a 1.0 s rotation time compared to 0.5-0.75 s (p<0.05). At 1.0 s, DLR also exhibited an unfavorable shift of the NPS toward lower frequencies, indicating degraded noise texture.

Conclusion: While DLR delivers superior image quality at gantry rotation times of 0.5-0.75s, it exhibits a loss of resolution and altered noise texture at 1.0 s. This degradation is likely attributable to the algorithm's limitations when processing data distributions that were underrepresented in its training set. Therefore, to optimize diagnostic performance, scan parameters must be carefully tailored to the specific reconstruction algorithm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信