护士职业应对自我效能量表的跨文化验证:一项横断面研究。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70333
Yan-Xue Zhai, Xiao-Yu Chai, Gan-Tang Zhang, Fang Xu, Limei Gao
{"title":"护士职业应对自我效能量表的跨文化验证:一项横断面研究。","authors":"Yan-Xue Zhai, Xiao-Yu Chai, Gan-Tang Zhang, Fang Xu, Limei Gao","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To translate the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses (OCSE-N) into a simplified Chinese version and test its reliability and validity among the Chinese nursing population.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Coping self-efficacy beliefs are important self-appraisals of one's capability to cope with challenging situations. Using a reliable and valid instrument to assess nurses' coping self-efficacy is essential. However, in previous studies in China, a specific scale to assess nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy was not available.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 1172 of 1200 nursing staff selected by convenience sampling from 5 public hospitals in Shenzhen completed the investigation. The OCSE-N was translated and adapted using the Brislin translation-back translation method. Then, the internal consistency of the OCSE-N-CHI was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The construct validity of the OCSE-N-CHI was analysed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha of the OCSE-N-CHI was 0.882, and the test-retest reliability was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.985-0.993, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficients of each item and the total score were 0.482-0.683 (p < 0.01). After exploratory factor analysis, the scale extracted 2 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 67.508% and a commonality of 0.524-0.860 for each entry. The empirical factor analysis of each fit index met the recommended criteria. Statistical differences existed in the occupational coping self-efficacy scores of nurses with different marital statuses, different levels of satisfaction with their jobs, as well as their income, and different average numbers of night shifts per week.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the OCSE-N-CHI are good, and it can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the occupational coping self-efficacy of nursing staff in China.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The OCSE-N-CHI can be completed by participants in less than 2 min and is considered a convenient and reliable measure of occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>After participants signed an informed consent form, questionnaires were completed in a conference room. The questionnaires were collected and entered in pairs in the office, and the data were analysed. Finally, the articles were written and revised.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 10","pages":"e70333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513557/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-Cultural Validation of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yan-Xue Zhai, Xiao-Yu Chai, Gan-Tang Zhang, Fang Xu, Limei Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/nop2.70333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To translate the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses (OCSE-N) into a simplified Chinese version and test its reliability and validity among the Chinese nursing population.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Coping self-efficacy beliefs are important self-appraisals of one's capability to cope with challenging situations. Using a reliable and valid instrument to assess nurses' coping self-efficacy is essential. However, in previous studies in China, a specific scale to assess nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy was not available.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 1172 of 1200 nursing staff selected by convenience sampling from 5 public hospitals in Shenzhen completed the investigation. The OCSE-N was translated and adapted using the Brislin translation-back translation method. Then, the internal consistency of the OCSE-N-CHI was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The construct validity of the OCSE-N-CHI was analysed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Cronbach's alpha of the OCSE-N-CHI was 0.882, and the test-retest reliability was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.985-0.993, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficients of each item and the total score were 0.482-0.683 (p < 0.01). After exploratory factor analysis, the scale extracted 2 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 67.508% and a commonality of 0.524-0.860 for each entry. The empirical factor analysis of each fit index met the recommended criteria. Statistical differences existed in the occupational coping self-efficacy scores of nurses with different marital statuses, different levels of satisfaction with their jobs, as well as their income, and different average numbers of night shifts per week.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The reliability and validity of the OCSE-N-CHI are good, and it can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the occupational coping self-efficacy of nursing staff in China.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>The OCSE-N-CHI can be completed by participants in less than 2 min and is considered a convenient and reliable measure of occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>After participants signed an informed consent form, questionnaires were completed in a conference room. The questionnaires were collected and entered in pairs in the office, and the data were analysed. Finally, the articles were written and revised.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Open\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"e70333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12513557/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70333\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70333","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:将《护士职业应对自我效能感量表》(OCSE-N)翻译成简体中文版,并在中国护理人群中检验其信度和效度。背景:应对自我效能信念是对个体应对挑战能力的重要自我评价。使用一种可靠有效的工具来评估护士的应对自我效能感是至关重要的。然而,在国内以往的研究中,并没有专门的量表来评估护士的职业应对自我效能感。设计:横断面研究。方法:采用方便抽样的方法,抽取深圳市5所公立医院1200名护理人员中的1172人完成调查。OCSE-N的翻译和改编采用Brislin翻译-反翻译方法。然后,采用Cronbach’s alpha测量OCSE-N-CHI的内部一致性。采用探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)对OCSE-N-CHI的构念效度进行分析。结果:OCSE-N-CHI量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.882,重测信度为0.991 (95% CI: 0.985 ~ 0.993, p)。结论:该量表具有较好的信度和效度,可作为评估中国护理人员职业应对自我效能的评估工具。与临床实践的相关性:参与者可以在2分钟内完成OCSE-N-CHI,被认为是护士职业应对自我效能的一种方便可靠的测量方法。患者或公众贡献:在参与者签署知情同意书后,在会议室完成问卷调查。调查问卷被收集并成对地在办公室输入,并对数据进行分析。最后,对文章进行了撰写和修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-Cultural Validation of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Aims and objectives: To translate the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses (OCSE-N) into a simplified Chinese version and test its reliability and validity among the Chinese nursing population.

Background: Coping self-efficacy beliefs are important self-appraisals of one's capability to cope with challenging situations. Using a reliable and valid instrument to assess nurses' coping self-efficacy is essential. However, in previous studies in China, a specific scale to assess nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy was not available.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Methods: In total, 1172 of 1200 nursing staff selected by convenience sampling from 5 public hospitals in Shenzhen completed the investigation. The OCSE-N was translated and adapted using the Brislin translation-back translation method. Then, the internal consistency of the OCSE-N-CHI was measured by Cronbach's alpha. The construct validity of the OCSE-N-CHI was analysed by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

Results: The Cronbach's alpha of the OCSE-N-CHI was 0.882, and the test-retest reliability was 0.991 (95% CI: 0.985-0.993, p < 0.01). The correlation coefficients of each item and the total score were 0.482-0.683 (p < 0.01). After exploratory factor analysis, the scale extracted 2 common factors with a cumulative variance contribution of 67.508% and a commonality of 0.524-0.860 for each entry. The empirical factor analysis of each fit index met the recommended criteria. Statistical differences existed in the occupational coping self-efficacy scores of nurses with different marital statuses, different levels of satisfaction with their jobs, as well as their income, and different average numbers of night shifts per week.

Conclusion: The reliability and validity of the OCSE-N-CHI are good, and it can be used as an assessment tool to evaluate the occupational coping self-efficacy of nursing staff in China.

Relevance to clinical practice: The OCSE-N-CHI can be completed by participants in less than 2 min and is considered a convenient and reliable measure of occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses.

Patient or public contribution: After participants signed an informed consent form, questionnaires were completed in a conference room. The questionnaires were collected and entered in pairs in the office, and the data were analysed. Finally, the articles were written and revised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信