定制髋臼假体与髂骨干固定在髋关节翻修手术中大骨缺损中的植入准确性。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Timo A Nees, Mustafa Hariri, Christian T Müller, Moritz M Innmann, David M Spranz, Fabian Westhauser, Tilman Walker, Tobias Reiner
{"title":"定制髋臼假体与髂骨干固定在髋关节翻修手术中大骨缺损中的植入准确性。","authors":"Timo A Nees, Mustafa Hariri, Christian T Müller, Moritz M Innmann, David M Spranz, Fabian Westhauser, Tilman Walker, Tobias Reiner","doi":"10.1111/os.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The treatment of extensive acetabular bone defects presents significant challenges in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants, tailored to patient-specific anatomy via 3D printing, offer potential advantages regarding implant stability and alignment. Precise positioning of these large-volume implants is crucial for primary stability and long-term fixation, but can be surgically demanding, especially when intramedullary iliac press-fit stems are used. In contrast to triflange custom-made implants, data on the implantation accuracy of custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation remain limited. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of implant positioning by comparing preoperatively planned component positions with postoperative radiographic outcomes, focusing on anteversion (AV), inclination (INCL), and the center of rotation (CoR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 24 patients with large acetabular defects (Paprosky ≥ 3A) underwent rTHA with custom-made acetabular components with intramedullary press-fit iliac stem fixation between November 2022 and April 2024. Implantation accuracy was evaluated by comparing the planned positions on preoperative CT scans with the actual implant positions observed on 6-week postoperative radiographs using a previously validated methodology. Discrepancies in AV, INCL, and the CoR were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high degree of alignment with preoperative plans was observed. The mean postoperative AV was 9.96° ± 6.4° (planned: 10.2°), and the mean INCL was 46.3° ± 3.2° (planned: 44.6°). The deviations were minor (Δ AV: -0.25°, Δ INCL: 1.7°), confirming the precision of implant placement. Four implants had CoR deviations exceeding 5 mm cranially (mean cranial shift: 1.77 ± 3.97 mm), and five exceeded 5 mm laterally. Most deviations were within clinically acceptable ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation can be implanted with high accuracy. Moreover, our results support the use of standard radiographs for the postoperative assessment of implant positioning precision. This study provides valuable insights into the accuracy of implant placement in complex rTHA cases, highlighting the role of patient-specific implant technologies in enhancing surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implantation Accuracy of Custom-Made Acetabular Components With Iliac Stem Fixation for Large Bone Defects in Hip Revision Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Timo A Nees, Mustafa Hariri, Christian T Müller, Moritz M Innmann, David M Spranz, Fabian Westhauser, Tilman Walker, Tobias Reiner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.70186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The treatment of extensive acetabular bone defects presents significant challenges in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants, tailored to patient-specific anatomy via 3D printing, offer potential advantages regarding implant stability and alignment. Precise positioning of these large-volume implants is crucial for primary stability and long-term fixation, but can be surgically demanding, especially when intramedullary iliac press-fit stems are used. In contrast to triflange custom-made implants, data on the implantation accuracy of custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation remain limited. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of implant positioning by comparing preoperatively planned component positions with postoperative radiographic outcomes, focusing on anteversion (AV), inclination (INCL), and the center of rotation (CoR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 24 patients with large acetabular defects (Paprosky ≥ 3A) underwent rTHA with custom-made acetabular components with intramedullary press-fit iliac stem fixation between November 2022 and April 2024. Implantation accuracy was evaluated by comparing the planned positions on preoperative CT scans with the actual implant positions observed on 6-week postoperative radiographs using a previously validated methodology. Discrepancies in AV, INCL, and the CoR were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A high degree of alignment with preoperative plans was observed. The mean postoperative AV was 9.96° ± 6.4° (planned: 10.2°), and the mean INCL was 46.3° ± 3.2° (planned: 44.6°). The deviations were minor (Δ AV: -0.25°, Δ INCL: 1.7°), confirming the precision of implant placement. Four implants had CoR deviations exceeding 5 mm cranially (mean cranial shift: 1.77 ± 3.97 mm), and five exceeded 5 mm laterally. Most deviations were within clinically acceptable ranges.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings demonstrate that custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation can be implanted with high accuracy. Moreover, our results support the use of standard radiographs for the postoperative assessment of implant positioning precision. This study provides valuable insights into the accuracy of implant placement in complex rTHA cases, highlighting the role of patient-specific implant technologies in enhancing surgical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70186\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.70186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:广泛髋臼骨缺损的治疗是翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)的重大挑战。通过3D打印为患者量身定制的植入物,在植入物稳定性和对齐方面提供了潜在的优势。这些大容量植入物的精确定位对于初级稳定性和长期固定至关重要,但可能在手术上要求很高,特别是当使用髓内髂加压装置时。与三法兰定制假体相比,定制髋臼假体与髂骨干固定的植入准确性数据仍然有限。本研究旨在通过比较术前计划的假体位置与术后影像学结果来评估种植体定位的准确性,重点关注前倾(AV)、倾斜(INCL)和旋转中心(CoR)。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,在2022年11月至2024年4月期间,24例髋臼大缺损(Paprosky≥3A)患者接受了定制髋臼假体与髓内加压髂干固定的rTHA。通过比较术前CT扫描上的计划位置与术后6周x线片上观察到的实际植入位置,使用先前验证的方法来评估植入准确性。分析AV、INCL和CoR的差异。结果:观察到与术前计划高度吻合。术后平均AV为9.96°±6.4°(计划为10.2°),平均INCL为46.3°±3.2°(计划为44.6°)。偏差较小(Δ AV: -0.25°,Δ INCL: 1.7°),证实了种植体放置的准确性。4个种植体的侧位偏差超过5mm(平均颅移:1.77±3.97 mm), 5个种植体侧位偏差超过5mm。大多数偏差在临床可接受范围内。结论:我们的研究结果表明,定制的髋臼假体与髂骨干固定可以植入高精度。此外,我们的研究结果支持使用标准x线片来评估植入物的术后定位精度。本研究为复杂rTHA病例中植入物放置的准确性提供了有价值的见解,强调了患者特异性植入物技术在提高手术效果方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implantation Accuracy of Custom-Made Acetabular Components With Iliac Stem Fixation for Large Bone Defects in Hip Revision Surgery.

Objectives: The treatment of extensive acetabular bone defects presents significant challenges in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA). Custom-made implants, tailored to patient-specific anatomy via 3D printing, offer potential advantages regarding implant stability and alignment. Precise positioning of these large-volume implants is crucial for primary stability and long-term fixation, but can be surgically demanding, especially when intramedullary iliac press-fit stems are used. In contrast to triflange custom-made implants, data on the implantation accuracy of custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation remain limited. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of implant positioning by comparing preoperatively planned component positions with postoperative radiographic outcomes, focusing on anteversion (AV), inclination (INCL), and the center of rotation (CoR).

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 24 patients with large acetabular defects (Paprosky ≥ 3A) underwent rTHA with custom-made acetabular components with intramedullary press-fit iliac stem fixation between November 2022 and April 2024. Implantation accuracy was evaluated by comparing the planned positions on preoperative CT scans with the actual implant positions observed on 6-week postoperative radiographs using a previously validated methodology. Discrepancies in AV, INCL, and the CoR were analyzed.

Results: A high degree of alignment with preoperative plans was observed. The mean postoperative AV was 9.96° ± 6.4° (planned: 10.2°), and the mean INCL was 46.3° ± 3.2° (planned: 44.6°). The deviations were minor (Δ AV: -0.25°, Δ INCL: 1.7°), confirming the precision of implant placement. Four implants had CoR deviations exceeding 5 mm cranially (mean cranial shift: 1.77 ± 3.97 mm), and five exceeded 5 mm laterally. Most deviations were within clinically acceptable ranges.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that custom-made acetabular components with iliac stem fixation can be implanted with high accuracy. Moreover, our results support the use of standard radiographs for the postoperative assessment of implant positioning precision. This study provides valuable insights into the accuracy of implant placement in complex rTHA cases, highlighting the role of patient-specific implant technologies in enhancing surgical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信