使用最小设备的运动干预对社区居住的痴呆成年人:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nien Xiang Tou, Lay Khoon Lau, Jonathan Gao, Jia Ying Tang, Liang Guo, Munro Yasmin Lynda, Yew Yoong Ding, Yee Sien Ng
{"title":"使用最小设备的运动干预对社区居住的痴呆成年人:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Nien Xiang Tou, Lay Khoon Lau, Jonathan Gao, Jia Ying Tang, Liang Guo, Munro Yasmin Lynda, Yew Yoong Ding, Yee Sien Ng","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although exercise is an appealing nonpharmacological intervention for patients with dementia, the use of specialized equipment or facility in some interventions limits its translation into community settings. However, the effectiveness of minimal equipment exercise programs is unclear. We aimed to synthesize the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment in community-dwelling adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>Randomized controlled trials enrolling community-dwelling adults diagnosed with dementia, examining the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for studies published from inception to September 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the effects on 6 outcome domains including cognitive function, physical performance, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD), quality of life, and caregivers' burden. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023428573).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies (1843 participants) were included. Despite high heterogeneity between studies, modest significant improvements were found in cognitive function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.06-1.06; low certainty), physical performance (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; low certainty), ADLs (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.08-0.71; low certainty), BPSD (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI, -1.24 to 0.46; very low certainty), QoL (SMD = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01-0.43; low certainty), and caregivers' burden (SMD = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.69 to 0.46; very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings suggest that exercise interventions involving minimal equipment show promising benefits in various outcome domains among community-dwelling adults with dementia. However, given the low certainty of evidence, more studies of higher quality are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":" ","pages":"105917"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exercise Interventions Involving Minimal Equipment for Community-Dwelling Adults With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Nien Xiang Tou, Lay Khoon Lau, Jonathan Gao, Jia Ying Tang, Liang Guo, Munro Yasmin Lynda, Yew Yoong Ding, Yee Sien Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although exercise is an appealing nonpharmacological intervention for patients with dementia, the use of specialized equipment or facility in some interventions limits its translation into community settings. However, the effectiveness of minimal equipment exercise programs is unclear. We aimed to synthesize the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment in community-dwelling adults with dementia.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Settings and participants: </strong>Randomized controlled trials enrolling community-dwelling adults diagnosed with dementia, examining the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for studies published from inception to September 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the effects on 6 outcome domains including cognitive function, physical performance, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD), quality of life, and caregivers' burden. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023428573).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-six studies (1843 participants) were included. Despite high heterogeneity between studies, modest significant improvements were found in cognitive function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.06-1.06; low certainty), physical performance (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; low certainty), ADLs (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.08-0.71; low certainty), BPSD (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI, -1.24 to 0.46; very low certainty), QoL (SMD = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01-0.43; low certainty), and caregivers' burden (SMD = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.69 to 0.46; very low certainty).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Our findings suggest that exercise interventions involving minimal equipment show promising benefits in various outcome domains among community-dwelling adults with dementia. However, given the low certainty of evidence, more studies of higher quality are needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"105917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105917\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2025.105917","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然运动对痴呆患者来说是一种很有吸引力的非药物干预措施,但在一些干预措施中使用专门的设备或设施限制了其在社区环境中的转化。然而,最小设备锻炼计划的有效性尚不清楚。我们的目的是综合使用最小设备的运动干预对社区居住的成年痴呆患者的影响。设计:系统回顾和荟萃分析。环境和参与者:随机对照试验招募社区居住的诊断为痴呆症的成年人,检查使用最小设备的运动干预的效果。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL、CINAHL和PsycINFO数据库中自成立至2024年9月发表的研究。对认知功能、身体表现、日常生活活动能力(ADLs)、行为和心理症状(BPSD)、生活质量和照顾者负担等6个结局领域进行meta分析。研究的方法学质量采用Cochrane’s RoB 2进行评估,证据的确定性采用推荐、评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)方法进行评估。该研究方案在PROSPERO中前瞻性注册(CRD42023428573)。结果:纳入26项研究(1843名受试者)。尽管研究之间存在高度异质性,但在认知功能(标准化平均差[SMD] = 0.56, 95% CI, 0.06-1.06,低确定性)、身体表现(SMD = 0.51, 95% CI, 0.13-0.89,低确定性)、adl (SMD = 0.39, 95% CI, 0.08-0.71,低确定性)、BPSD (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI, -1.24 - 0.46,极低确定性)、生活质量(SMD = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.01-0.43,低确定性)和照顾者负担(SMD = -0.12, 95% CI, -0.69 - 0.46;非常低的确定性)。结论和意义:我们的研究结果表明,在社区居住的成年痴呆症患者中,使用最小设备的运动干预在各个结果领域显示出有希望的益处。然而,鉴于证据的低确定性,需要更多高质量的研究来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exercise Interventions Involving Minimal Equipment for Community-Dwelling Adults With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: Although exercise is an appealing nonpharmacological intervention for patients with dementia, the use of specialized equipment or facility in some interventions limits its translation into community settings. However, the effectiveness of minimal equipment exercise programs is unclear. We aimed to synthesize the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment in community-dwelling adults with dementia.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Settings and participants: Randomized controlled trials enrolling community-dwelling adults diagnosed with dementia, examining the effects of exercise interventions involving minimal equipment.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases for studies published from inception to September 2024. A meta-analysis was performed to synthesize the effects on 6 outcome domains including cognitive function, physical performance, ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs), behavioral and psychological symptoms (BPSD), quality of life, and caregivers' burden. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using Cochrane's RoB 2, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023428573).

Results: Twenty-six studies (1843 participants) were included. Despite high heterogeneity between studies, modest significant improvements were found in cognitive function (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.06-1.06; low certainty), physical performance (SMD = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; low certainty), ADLs (SMD = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.08-0.71; low certainty), BPSD (SMD = -0.39; 95% CI, -1.24 to 0.46; very low certainty), QoL (SMD = 0.22; 95% CI, 0.01-0.43; low certainty), and caregivers' burden (SMD = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.69 to 0.46; very low certainty).

Conclusions and implications: Our findings suggest that exercise interventions involving minimal equipment show promising benefits in various outcome domains among community-dwelling adults with dementia. However, given the low certainty of evidence, more studies of higher quality are needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信