根据修改后的脑损伤指南到1级创伤中心就诊的患者的特征和住院结果

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kevin T Kim, Steven K Yarmoska, Cara Lomangino, Callum D Dewar, Matthew Hentschel, Maureen Scarboro, Carla Aresco, Deborah M Stein, David Efron, Gary Schwartzbauer
{"title":"根据修改后的脑损伤指南到1级创伤中心就诊的患者的特征和住院结果","authors":"Kevin T Kim, Steven K Yarmoska, Cara Lomangino, Callum D Dewar, Matthew Hentschel, Maureen Scarboro, Carla Aresco, Deborah M Stein, David Efron, Gary Schwartzbauer","doi":"10.3171/2025.6.JNS25342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were modified in 2020 to improve efficiency and safety in triage decision-making. The aim of this study was to present characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients classified under category 1 of the modified BIG (mBIG 1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) to a level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023 was performed. Patients meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for mBIG 1 were identified. An additional cohort of patients was identified who were taking 81 mg of aspirin once daily (ASA81) before the hospital, but who otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. Summary statistics and univariate analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred three patients were identified and classified as mBIG 1. The mean patient age was 54.45 (SD 1.17) years and 41.3% were female. There were 144 patients (47.5%) who transferred from an outside hospital. The median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 15-15). Patients underwent an average of 2.28 (SD 0.03) CT scans. There were 123 (40.6%), 18 (5.9%), and 126 (41.6%) patients with subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively, with 36 patients (11.9%) presenting with multiple hemorrhages. Eleven patients (3.6%) experienced hemorrhage progression. No patient underwent neurosurgical intervention. The mean Injury Severity Score was 13.12 (SD 7.04). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 (IQR 0.37-4.56) days, 75.2% of patients were discharged home, 24.1% were discharged to rehabilitation, and 0.7% died in the hospital. An additional 25 patients were identified who were taking ASA81 prehospital, but otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. None of these patients underwent neurosurgical intervention and there were no in-hospital deaths. One patient (4.0%) taking ASA81 experienced progression of their hemorrhage but still met mBIG 1 criteria. When compared to the mBIG 1 cohort, the aspirin cohort was significantly older (p < 0.001), but otherwise showed no differences in demographic, clinical, or radiographic variables. The combined mBIG 1 + aspirin cohort was stratified by hemorrhage progression (n = 12). Hospital LOS was significantly greater in the progression cohort (p = 0.017) and fewer patients were discharged home (p = 0.001). There was no difference in age, hypertension, admission mean arterial pressure, platelet count, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, hemorrhage pattern, and aspirin use between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemorrhage progression was rare, including cases in which patients were receiving prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy. More data are needed that evaluate the role of low-dose aspirin in the triage of patients with mild TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center classified under the modified Brain Injury Guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin T Kim, Steven K Yarmoska, Cara Lomangino, Callum D Dewar, Matthew Hentschel, Maureen Scarboro, Carla Aresco, Deborah M Stein, David Efron, Gary Schwartzbauer\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.6.JNS25342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were modified in 2020 to improve efficiency and safety in triage decision-making. The aim of this study was to present characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients classified under category 1 of the modified BIG (mBIG 1).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) to a level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023 was performed. Patients meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for mBIG 1 were identified. An additional cohort of patients was identified who were taking 81 mg of aspirin once daily (ASA81) before the hospital, but who otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. Summary statistics and univariate analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred three patients were identified and classified as mBIG 1. The mean patient age was 54.45 (SD 1.17) years and 41.3% were female. There were 144 patients (47.5%) who transferred from an outside hospital. The median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 15-15). Patients underwent an average of 2.28 (SD 0.03) CT scans. There were 123 (40.6%), 18 (5.9%), and 126 (41.6%) patients with subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively, with 36 patients (11.9%) presenting with multiple hemorrhages. Eleven patients (3.6%) experienced hemorrhage progression. No patient underwent neurosurgical intervention. The mean Injury Severity Score was 13.12 (SD 7.04). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 (IQR 0.37-4.56) days, 75.2% of patients were discharged home, 24.1% were discharged to rehabilitation, and 0.7% died in the hospital. An additional 25 patients were identified who were taking ASA81 prehospital, but otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. None of these patients underwent neurosurgical intervention and there were no in-hospital deaths. One patient (4.0%) taking ASA81 experienced progression of their hemorrhage but still met mBIG 1 criteria. When compared to the mBIG 1 cohort, the aspirin cohort was significantly older (p < 0.001), but otherwise showed no differences in demographic, clinical, or radiographic variables. The combined mBIG 1 + aspirin cohort was stratified by hemorrhage progression (n = 12). Hospital LOS was significantly greater in the progression cohort (p = 0.017) and fewer patients were discharged home (p = 0.001). There was no difference in age, hypertension, admission mean arterial pressure, platelet count, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, hemorrhage pattern, and aspirin use between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemorrhage progression was rare, including cases in which patients were receiving prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy. More data are needed that evaluate the role of low-dose aspirin in the triage of patients with mild TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.6.JNS25342\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.6.JNS25342","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在2020年修订脑损伤指南(BIG),以提高分诊决策的效率和安全性。本研究的目的是介绍归类为改良BIG (mBIG 1)第1类患者的特征和住院结果。方法:回顾性分析2019年至2023年在某一级创伤中心就诊的急性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者。确定符合mBIG 1临床和影像学标准的患者。另外一组患者在入院前每日服用81毫克阿司匹林(ASA81),但其他方面符合mBIG 1标准。进行汇总统计和单因素分析。结果:300例患者被确诊为mBIG 1型。患者平均年龄为54.45岁(SD 1.17),其中41.3%为女性。144例(47.5%)患者从外院转院。入院时格拉斯哥昏迷评分中位数为15分(四分位间距[IQR] 15-15)。患者平均接受2.28次(SD 0.03) CT扫描。硬膜下血肿、肺实质出血、蛛网膜下腔出血分别123例(40.6%)、18例(5.9%)、126例(41.6%),多发出血36例(11.9%)。11例患者(3.6%)出现出血进展。没有患者接受神经外科干预。平均损伤严重程度评分为13.12 (SD 7.04)。中位住院时间(LOS)为1.01 (IQR 0.37-4.56)天,75.2%的患者出院回家,24.1%的患者出院康复,0.7%的患者在医院死亡。另外25例患者院前服用ASA81,但符合mBIG 1标准。这些患者均未接受神经外科干预,也无院内死亡。1例患者(4.0%)服用ASA81后出血进展,但仍符合mBIG 1标准。与mBIG 1组相比,阿司匹林组明显更老(p < 0.001),但在人口统计学、临床或放射学变量方面没有差异。mBIG 1 +阿司匹林联合队列按出血进展进行分层(n = 12)。在进展队列中,医院LOS显著增加(p = 0.017),出院回家的患者较少(p = 0.001)。两组患者在年龄、高血压、入院平均动脉压、血小板计数、国际标准化比值、部分凝血活酶时间、出血模式和阿司匹林使用方面均无差异。结论:出血进展罕见,包括院前接受低剂量阿司匹林治疗的患者。需要更多的数据来评估低剂量阿司匹林在轻度创伤性脑损伤患者分选中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients presenting to a level 1 trauma center classified under the modified Brain Injury Guidelines.

Objective: The Brain Injury Guidelines (BIG) were modified in 2020 to improve efficiency and safety in triage decision-making. The aim of this study was to present characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients classified under category 1 of the modified BIG (mBIG 1).

Methods: A retrospective review of patients presenting with acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) to a level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023 was performed. Patients meeting clinical and radiographic criteria for mBIG 1 were identified. An additional cohort of patients was identified who were taking 81 mg of aspirin once daily (ASA81) before the hospital, but who otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. Summary statistics and univariate analyses were performed.

Results: Three hundred three patients were identified and classified as mBIG 1. The mean patient age was 54.45 (SD 1.17) years and 41.3% were female. There were 144 patients (47.5%) who transferred from an outside hospital. The median admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 15-15). Patients underwent an average of 2.28 (SD 0.03) CT scans. There were 123 (40.6%), 18 (5.9%), and 126 (41.6%) patients with subdural hematoma, intraparenchymal hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage, respectively, with 36 patients (11.9%) presenting with multiple hemorrhages. Eleven patients (3.6%) experienced hemorrhage progression. No patient underwent neurosurgical intervention. The mean Injury Severity Score was 13.12 (SD 7.04). The median hospital length of stay (LOS) was 1.01 (IQR 0.37-4.56) days, 75.2% of patients were discharged home, 24.1% were discharged to rehabilitation, and 0.7% died in the hospital. An additional 25 patients were identified who were taking ASA81 prehospital, but otherwise met mBIG 1 criteria. None of these patients underwent neurosurgical intervention and there were no in-hospital deaths. One patient (4.0%) taking ASA81 experienced progression of their hemorrhage but still met mBIG 1 criteria. When compared to the mBIG 1 cohort, the aspirin cohort was significantly older (p < 0.001), but otherwise showed no differences in demographic, clinical, or radiographic variables. The combined mBIG 1 + aspirin cohort was stratified by hemorrhage progression (n = 12). Hospital LOS was significantly greater in the progression cohort (p = 0.017) and fewer patients were discharged home (p = 0.001). There was no difference in age, hypertension, admission mean arterial pressure, platelet count, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, hemorrhage pattern, and aspirin use between the groups.

Conclusions: Hemorrhage progression was rare, including cases in which patients were receiving prehospital low-dose aspirin therapy. More data are needed that evaluate the role of low-dose aspirin in the triage of patients with mild TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信