聚焦超声包膜切开术:基于颅骨形态学预测成功切除的概率。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emmanuel De Schlichting, Yuexi Huang, Ryan M Jones, Ying Meng, Xingshan Cao, Anusha Baskaran, Kullervo Hynynen, Clement Hamani, Nir Lipsman, Maged Goubran, Benjamin Davidson
{"title":"聚焦超声包膜切开术:基于颅骨形态学预测成功切除的概率。","authors":"Emmanuel De Schlichting, Yuexi Huang, Ryan M Jones, Ying Meng, Xingshan Cao, Anusha Baskaran, Kullervo Hynynen, Clement Hamani, Nir Lipsman, Maged Goubran, Benjamin Davidson","doi":"10.3171/2025.6.JNS2588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>MR-guided focused ultrasound anterior capsulotomy (MRgFUS-AC) is an incisionless ablative procedure, which has shown reassuring safety and compelling efficacy in the treatment of refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder. However, in some patients lesions cannot be reliably generated due to patient-specific skull morphologies and properties. Despite screening patients for MRgFUS-AC using skull density ratio (SDR), up to 25% of cases experience treatment failure. This variability in technical success limits the real-world applicability of an otherwise highly impactful treatment, and a better predictor of success is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from 60 attempted MRgFUS-AC treatments in 57 patients between 2017 and 2024. Treatments were categorized as success or failure based on lesion volume. Preoperative parameters, including SDR, skull thickness, angle of incidence, CSF volume, brain and head volumes, and lesion side, were recorded. Logistic and machine learning models were evaluated to construct a preoperative model to predict the probability of technical success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 lesions were treated, of which 31 experienced treatment failure. Higher SDR, thinner skulls, and lower incident angles were significantly associated with successful outcomes (all p < 0.05). The logistic regression model performed the best among the models tested, with an accuracy of 0.81 ± 0.07 and an F1 score of 0.89 ± 0.04. The model was incorporated into a predictive tool to aid in identifying candidates for MRgFUS-AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SDR, skull thickness, and angle of incidence significantly influenced the likelihood of successful MRgFUS-AC lesioning. Incorporating these three parameters into a predictive tool can dramatically reduce technical failure rates and may be especially informative in patients with an SDR between 0.35 and 0.55.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Focused ultrasound capsulotomy: predicting the probability of successful lesioning based on skull morphology.\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel De Schlichting, Yuexi Huang, Ryan M Jones, Ying Meng, Xingshan Cao, Anusha Baskaran, Kullervo Hynynen, Clement Hamani, Nir Lipsman, Maged Goubran, Benjamin Davidson\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.6.JNS2588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>MR-guided focused ultrasound anterior capsulotomy (MRgFUS-AC) is an incisionless ablative procedure, which has shown reassuring safety and compelling efficacy in the treatment of refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder. However, in some patients lesions cannot be reliably generated due to patient-specific skull morphologies and properties. Despite screening patients for MRgFUS-AC using skull density ratio (SDR), up to 25% of cases experience treatment failure. This variability in technical success limits the real-world applicability of an otherwise highly impactful treatment, and a better predictor of success is needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed data from 60 attempted MRgFUS-AC treatments in 57 patients between 2017 and 2024. Treatments were categorized as success or failure based on lesion volume. Preoperative parameters, including SDR, skull thickness, angle of incidence, CSF volume, brain and head volumes, and lesion side, were recorded. Logistic and machine learning models were evaluated to construct a preoperative model to predict the probability of technical success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 157 lesions were treated, of which 31 experienced treatment failure. Higher SDR, thinner skulls, and lower incident angles were significantly associated with successful outcomes (all p < 0.05). The logistic regression model performed the best among the models tested, with an accuracy of 0.81 ± 0.07 and an F1 score of 0.89 ± 0.04. The model was incorporated into a predictive tool to aid in identifying candidates for MRgFUS-AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SDR, skull thickness, and angle of incidence significantly influenced the likelihood of successful MRgFUS-AC lesioning. Incorporating these three parameters into a predictive tool can dramatically reduce technical failure rates and may be especially informative in patients with an SDR between 0.35 and 0.55.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.6.JNS2588\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.6.JNS2588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:磁共振引导下聚焦超声前囊切开术(MRgFUS-AC)是一种无切口的消融手术,在治疗难治性强迫症和重度抑郁症方面显示出令人满意的安全性和令人瞩目的疗效。然而,在一些患者中,由于患者特定的颅骨形态和性质,病变不能可靠地产生。尽管使用颅骨密度比(SDR)筛查MRgFUS-AC患者,但高达25%的病例治疗失败。这种技术成功的可变性限制了在现实世界中的应用,因此需要一个更好的预测成功的方法。方法:本研究分析了2017年至2024年间57例患者的60例MRgFUS-AC治疗尝试数据。治疗的成功与否取决于病灶的大小。记录术前各项参数,包括SDR、颅骨厚度、入射角、脑脊液容积、脑及头部容积、病变侧方。评估逻辑模型和机器学习模型,构建术前模型来预测技术成功的概率。结果:共治疗病变157例,治疗失败31例。更高的SDR、更薄的颅骨和更低的入射角与成功的结局显著相关(均p < 0.05)。logistic回归模型的准确率为0.81±0.07,F1评分为0.89±0.04。该模型被整合到一个预测工具中,以帮助确定MRgFUS-AC的候选药物。结论:SDR、颅骨厚度和入射角显著影响MRgFUS-AC病变成功的可能性。将这三个参数合并到预测工具中可以显著降低技术失败率,对于SDR在0.35至0.55之间的患者尤其有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Focused ultrasound capsulotomy: predicting the probability of successful lesioning based on skull morphology.

Objective: MR-guided focused ultrasound anterior capsulotomy (MRgFUS-AC) is an incisionless ablative procedure, which has shown reassuring safety and compelling efficacy in the treatment of refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depressive disorder. However, in some patients lesions cannot be reliably generated due to patient-specific skull morphologies and properties. Despite screening patients for MRgFUS-AC using skull density ratio (SDR), up to 25% of cases experience treatment failure. This variability in technical success limits the real-world applicability of an otherwise highly impactful treatment, and a better predictor of success is needed.

Methods: This study analyzed data from 60 attempted MRgFUS-AC treatments in 57 patients between 2017 and 2024. Treatments were categorized as success or failure based on lesion volume. Preoperative parameters, including SDR, skull thickness, angle of incidence, CSF volume, brain and head volumes, and lesion side, were recorded. Logistic and machine learning models were evaluated to construct a preoperative model to predict the probability of technical success.

Results: A total of 157 lesions were treated, of which 31 experienced treatment failure. Higher SDR, thinner skulls, and lower incident angles were significantly associated with successful outcomes (all p < 0.05). The logistic regression model performed the best among the models tested, with an accuracy of 0.81 ± 0.07 and an F1 score of 0.89 ± 0.04. The model was incorporated into a predictive tool to aid in identifying candidates for MRgFUS-AC.

Conclusions: SDR, skull thickness, and angle of incidence significantly influenced the likelihood of successful MRgFUS-AC lesioning. Incorporating these three parameters into a predictive tool can dramatically reduce technical failure rates and may be especially informative in patients with an SDR between 0.35 and 0.55.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信